RobertG Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 16 hours ago, damnyoutuesday said: It's his actual jersey number I love how we're at the point that a player's actual jersey number has become an afterthought to the ads and gimmicks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 11 hours ago, FiddySicks said: So, is that the last CityConnect? If so: 0/28 Not a single one of these is worth retaining past the life of this program. I almost agree. Maybe the Royals could use theirs for an alt but that's about it. I think a couple of them had some visual appeal...the Cubs one looked nice to me but "Wrigleyville" should not be on a jersey. Would be a nice enough t-shirt for the pro shop. A few more nice pro-shop shirts. (I've also never understood the nearly universal love for the Miami jersey. And nearly as much love for the Angels, which I think is absolute garbage. To each their own...) 3 Quote Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anubis2051 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 hour ago, OnWis97 said: I almost agree. Maybe the Royals could use theirs for an alt but that's about it. I think a couple of them had some visual appeal...the Cubs one looked nice to me but "Wrigleyville" should not be on a jersey. Would be a nice enough t-shirt for the pro shop. A few more nice pro-shop shirts. (I've also never understood the nearly universal love for the Miami jersey. And nearly as much love for the Angels, which I think is absolute garbage. To each their own...) Tampa’s is better than their current look. The Angels is as well. CWS is great and well loved. Brewers looks great and is a great alt. San Diego’s is a great alt as well - you probably see almost an equal amount of the CC and regular look at the ballpark. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsarebad Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 For CC unis i think Angels, Astros, Diamondbacks, Mariners are good....... this year is a real stinker from Nike, only the Cardinals are acceptable. So many brutal ones 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkKidCatholic Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 4 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 22 hours ago, adsarebad said: My bad, it's not a zip code on the front......... it's feet above sea level ! https://www.nba.com/nuggets/news/a-badge-of-honor-an-in-depth-look-at-the-nuggets-5280-city-edition-uniforms Is the arena floor actually 5280 feet above sea level though 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adsarebad Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 11 minutes ago, DrunkKidCatholic said: A Statue of Liberty inspired Yankees CC uniform? It could work if done right! Calling it Liberty green is idiotic though. It's just how old copper looks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1. 5,280’ is so overplayed. It’s not even that high above sea level compared to where lots of teams across the world play, and where way more people than are in Denver live. 2. Marlins should absolutely be the basis for a new look. White Sox too, just get rid of the dumb pattern and make it say either Chicago, White Sox, or just the Sox logo. 3. Saw basically every team’s jersey represented in London for the Mets/Phillies series. The wording/patches on the TB one don’t stand out nearly as much as I thought, and the hat looked way duller than I was expecting. There’s something there, for sure, but they need to lean harder into the “glow” of it all. And the “faded in the sun” pattern is ridiculous. Quote "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 The D-backs and Nationals are probably the only ones I'd like to see stay, even if they come out with different versions/color bases for them. I think the Astros could really find a way to use theirs as a basis for a new alternate, maybe swap out "Space City" for something else. There were other CCs that were at least interesting to see maybe once, but I do think that a majority of these don't really need to be preserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coco1997 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 9 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 hour ago, BBTV said: Marlins should absolutely be the basis for a new look. White Sox too, just get rid of the dumb pattern and make it say either Chicago, White Sox, or just the Sox logo. I caught a clip of a podcast where A.J. Pierzynski said Brooks Boyer, "in his infinite wisdom," pitched all-black road uniforms years ago, Konerko polled the clubhouse, and they all said hell no to wearing all black in Kansas City in July. 4 1 Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 5 hours ago, chcarlson23 said: I would agree that most of these aren’t great, including my Minnesota Twins. Almost all of these feel like let downs, with how good they could have been… But the White Sox seems to be a perfect blend of both city and team branding. I don’t really like the Sox, but honestly wouldn’t mind having one of those jerseys. What is it about that one you don’t like? For me personally, that’s are a lot of wins with that look mixed in with a decent amount of misses. The reverse home look is good, but I can’t imagine the players really love playing July/August day games in them (I have no idea what their schedule is for that, so if they only wear them for, like, night games or whatever then forgive me). But I HATE the “SouthSide” nickname on them. I get that it’s a nickname, but that kind of stuff just looks so out of place in a sport as traditional as baseball. I usually try not to do the whole “purist” kind of thing with baseball, because times change and people need to better roll with that. But, for whatever reason, this whole thing just doesn’t sit right with me. It’s triggering something within the deep recesses of my brain that makes me wanna say out loud “this is wrong”. I said it a few days ago, that this type of program is easier to roll with in a sport like basketball. It’s more “modern” of a sport, and had a history of these out there kinda looks. Doing the same with baseball just kinda feels like flying in the face of one of the things that people do genuinely like about MLB level baseball. Just IMO. I know not everyone is going to agree, and their points are just as valid as mine. I’m actually sort of surprised by the visceral reaction I’m having to these. @OnWis97 basically typed out how I feel about these. Also with him on that Angels set. No idea why anyone likes that more than their regular set. The regular set has issues, but my goodness does that Angels CC suck out loud. My very best friend is an Angels fan (posts here occasionally, too), and he HATES them. 2 1 Quote On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 The Sox shouldn't have a uniform proclaiming that they're from the South Side when their owner is trying to rustle up taxpayer money to move out of it. 6 1 4 Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 2 hours ago, Anubis2051 said: Tampa’s is better than their current look. The Angels is as well. CWS is great and well loved. Brewers looks great and is a great alt. San Diego’s is a great alt as well - you probably see almost an equal amount of the CC and regular look at the ballpark. WTF? Not if you want to be able to see numbers. Or names. Or the logo. The hat is cute. I'll give you that. 5 Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chcarlson23 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 hour ago, FiddySicks said: For me personally, that’s are a lot of wins with that look mixed in with a decent amount of misses. The reverse home look is good, but I can’t imagine the players really love playing July/August day games in them (I have no idea what their schedule is for that, so if they only wear them for, like, night games or whatever then forgive me). But I HATE the “SouthSide” nickname on them. I get that it’s a nickname, but that kind of stuff just looks so out of place in a sport as traditional as baseball. I usually try not to do the whole “purist” kind of thing with baseball, because times change and people need to better roll with that. But, for whatever reason, this whole thing just doesn’t sit right with me. It’s triggering something within the deep recesses of my brain that makes me wanna say out loud “this is wrong”. I said it a few days ago, that this type of program is easier to roll with in a sport like basketball. It’s more “modern” of a sport, and had a history of these out there kinda looks. Doing the same with baseball just kinda feels like flying in the face of one of the things that people do genuinely like about MLB level baseball. Just IMO. I know not everyone is going to agree, and their points are just as valid as mine. I’m actually sort of surprised by the visceral reaction I’m having to these. @OnWis97 basically typed out how I feel about these. Also with him on that Angels set. No idea why anyone likes that more than their regular set. The regular set has issues, but my goodness does that Angels CC suck out loud. My very best friend is an Angels fan (posts here occasionally, too), and he HATES them. I guess I don’t mind the Southside nickname on them, because baseball is filled with nicknames on the front of jerseys. That’s kinda how team names started. Media called baseball teams something, and once it stuck, teams started wearing that on their uniforms. White Sox is definitely one of those nicknames too. Wrigleyville is honestly more out there for me. But the Sox have been known as the South Siders for a long time. 1 Quote "And those who know Your Name put their trust in You, for You, O Lord, have not forsaken those who seek You." Psalms 9:10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Too bad the A's were not part of year 1. They'd be long done wearing it. But for those interested (which isn't a ton of fans), it's an amusing PR gaffe of sorts...the A's cannot do a city connect because they're connected to either zero or three cities at this time. And at this stage, I think the Yankees may as well participate. They have an ad for an insurance company on their sleeves. Do they really need to cling to tradition? 3 Quote Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Digby Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 I would get a good laugh over the Yankees trying to steal an idea from the women's soccer and basketball teams, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Wind of Doom Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 18-5-5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tBBP Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 8 hours ago, adsarebad said: For CC unis i think Angels, Astros, Diamondbacks, Mariners are good....... this year is a real stinker from Nike, only the Cardinals are acceptable. So many brutal ones My synopsis: The Lou notwithstanding (because that on its own really fits within the already established Cardinals aesthetic), two of these could serve as the basis for a full-on rebrand. Remove the giant IATA script, draft out new scripts that spell out the city name and nickname and that Guardians set (minus the sublimation) would be good to go tomorrow. Use some more of the actual colors (that is, make the jersey or scripts/numbers—or both) an actual color, lose the flame tips on the glyphs, and that Rays set would instantly be better than their current or inaugural looks. The only other one of those I find myself liking as a perma-alt if it were to ever happen would be the Brew Crew set. (Though I suppose the Seripientes one isn't bad on its own.) 8 hours ago, DrunkKidCatholic said: So y'all remember this Matt guy should the Yanks actually end up doing this. Careful what you wish for, bud! 7 hours ago, adsarebad said: A Statue of Liberty inspired Yankees CC uniform? It could work if done right! Calling it Liberty green is idiotic though. It's just how old copper looks Tell that to the WNBA team that uses/calls it that. (I'm also honestly surprised the Yankees are even letting him get away with that since they still won't even allow facial hair...unless they all are cross-promoting the Liberty or something, I don't know.) 1 Quote *Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. || dribbble || Behance || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 nvm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.