Jump to content

2024 NFL Changes


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, rfraser85 said:

I'm curious about the Jets alternate uniforms. If they're using the Sack Exchange jersey template, which only has two colors, will the black jersey have any green anywhere? That's my big question for next week when they reveal their new(ish) uniforms.

You need to be asking yourself more if it will have contrast anywhere.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rfraser85 said:

I'm curious about the Jets alternate uniforms. If they're using the Sack Exchange jersey template, which only has two colors, will the black jersey have any green anywhere? That's my big question for next week when they reveal their new(ish) uniforms.

I'm curious what element of the regular uniforms or logo will be black to allow the use of a black alternate

  • Like 3

Sorry, I'm on an iPad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MNtwins3 said:

I'm curious what element of the regular uniforms or logo will be black to allow the use of a black alternate

 

They don't need black on the regular uniforms or logo, as black would be considered a historical color for them.

 

  • Like 4

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Silver_Star said:

I did not say that either. I am just saying using a Ram's head is as generic as how the Ravens had to ditch the shield due to legal reasons and couldn't make anything interest that could include another shield with the bird using some Old English stuff?
 

But looking at the Rams, the horns on the helmet is very unique and is a mainstay since 1948.

 

You still seem confused. No one is suggesting taking the horns off the helmets and replacing them with a logo.

 

You say a ram head is generic, but it would be miles better than the gradient-filled L@ logo that's currently used as the primary logo. The Rams just need to pull a Chicago and swap the designations of their two logos so that the head is the primary and the LA monogram is the secondary.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, spartacat_12 said:

 

You still seem confused. No one is suggesting taking the horns off the helmets and replacing them with a logo.

 

You say a ram head is generic, but it would be miles better than the gradient-filled L@ logo that's currently used as the primary logo. The Rams just need to pull a Chicago and swap the designations of their two logos so that the head is the primary and the LA monogram is the secondary.

 

Neither logo is any good IMO, ram head or LA. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thisguyphelps said:

Teams not allowed to use black:

Chargers

Bears

Giants

Titans

Patriots

Broncos

Seahawks

Dolphins

Packers

Texans

Browns

Rams (? Possible history)

Bills

 

NIKE DESIGN SPECIALIST: That's what you think...mwahahahaha!!! 😉

  • LOL 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thisguyphelps said:

Teams not allowed to use black:

Chargers

Bears

Giants

Titans

Patriots

Broncos

Seahawks

Dolphins

Packers

Texans

Browns

Rams (? Possible history)

Bills

 

Nike: "Challenge accepted"

  • LOL 7

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, spartacat_12 said:

 

You still seem confused. No one is suggesting taking the horns off the helmets and replacing them with a logo.

 

You say a ram head is generic, but it would be miles better than the gradient-filled L@ logo that's currently used as the primary logo. The Rams just need to pull a Chicago and swap the designations of their two logos so that the head is the primary and the LA monogram is the secondary.

 

Once again, I stated how generic it is putting a mascot head on a helmet just like how the Baltimore Ravens had to do that in 1999 and decided a raven's head works for a logo, It was very silly to me and it could of been done differently if I had my way.

The gradient goofy stuff was not my cup of tea, sir. I never was into that 1990's goofy designs similar how the NBA did theirs in the 1990's which is why I do not cherish 1990's designs or the culture.

But you seem like you are confused as to what I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, PlayGloria said:

 

Neither logo is any good IMO, ram head or LA. 

 

Both of them suck. I rather had kept the St. Louis Rams ram's head logo and use the type face they have for their scripts, but the LA and rams head they currently use sucks so bad, it just ugly and demeaning.

 

On 4/7/2024 at 9:14 AM, McCall said:

He said helmets AS the logo.

 

I just saw this just now on my alerts. I never said have the helmet as the logo. I would prefer the St. Louis Rams ram head they used just with the royal blue and athletic gold colors.

  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, burgundy said:

 

They don't need black on the regular uniforms or logo, as black would be considered a historical color for them.

 

 

If the Jets designate the black uniform as Color Rush, yes. But I don't think that works with alternates. They could probably just make the Nike mark black like the Colts and that would be sufficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Silver_Star said:

Once again, I stated how generic it is putting a mascot head on a helmet just like how the Baltimore Ravens had to do that in 1999 and decided a raven's head works for a logo, It was very silly to me and it could of been done differently if I had my way.

The gradient goofy stuff was not my cup of tea, sir. I never was into that 1990's goofy designs similar how the NBA did theirs in the 1990's which is why I do not cherish 1990's designs or the culture.

But you seem like you are confused as to what I said.

 

And once again, not a single person has suggested putting a ram head logo on the helmet, so I'm not sure why you keep bringing up the Ravens.

 

Someone suggested the Rams should go back to using the horned helmet as the primary logo, which they did in the '80s up until they moved to St. Louis. You seemed to interpret this as them suggesting that the team should use their primary logo on the helmet instead of the horns.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2024 at 1:15 PM, The_Admiral said:

I'm going to echo what tons of people here have already said (and mocked up), which is that if the old-timey Browns are going to commit to a helmet as a logo, they should go so far back that no one could confuse the helmet with recent history: an old one-bar facemask, for instance. Lean into the concept of predating a logo rather than using the stock helmet art across the league and calling it a primary--especially when that stock helmet art is a relic of the recent, not distant, past.

 

Personally, I think the =B= football was halfway to the right idea, it just should have been a =C= instead.

Worst Coaching Decisions of the Cleveland Browns: Part 3 - Dawgs By Nature

Make this weirdo helmet happen. I was endlessly intrigued by these coaches jackets when I was a kid.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said:

Of all the uniform teasers there could ever be, I would have never expected a blurred out horse :censored: to appear 

 

I can't seem to identify that number font they use for the date and it's the same one they used on their announcement. I'm still thinking it's the new jersey number font, hopefully a bold version of it atleast. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DCarp1231 said:

Of all the uniform teasers there could ever be, I would have never expected a blurred out horse :censored: to appear 

 

 

 

When did the Broncos sign Nick Foles?

 

  • Like 1
  • Applause 1
  • LOL 7

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, KouPilot said:

I can't seem to identify that number font they use for the date and it's the same one they used on their announcement. I'm still thinking it's the new jersey number font, hopefully a bold version of it atleast. 

Doubt it.  That’s the kind of detective nonsense we seem to indulge in every year and it pretty much never happens.  

  • Like 5
  • LOL 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said:

Doubt it.  That’s the kind of detective nonsense we seem to indulge in every year and it pretty much never happens.  


I hope you’re right, because that number font is hot trash.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Krona said:

Worst Coaching Decisions of the Cleveland Browns: Part 3 - Dawgs By Nature

Make this weirdo helmet happen. I was endlessly intrigued by these coaches jackets when I was a kid.

I’m more intrigued by the space in (Travis?) McNeil’s surname. 
 

Which reminds me of old footage I saw of Super Bowl XX, where the Patriots’ Larry McGrew had a similar gap after the Mc. 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.