Anyone else notice a big similarity between these?

[patsox]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v669/bcr12789/unis2.bmp

[IronChefShark]

nope. none whatsoever

[twi]

Maybe just the tiniest bit in the slope of the wordmark, but regarding the literally thousands of logos out there, it's not unlikely to see something that may be a little similiar, even in the same league.

Edit: Nice sigs ICS, I'll wear the home team one.

[patsox]

yeah there is. the script is relatively similar and try and tell me the sd and the dc aren't almost exactly alike. Then. the uniform templates are the same.

[Mings]

yeah there is. the script is relatively similar and try and tell me the sd and the dc aren't almost exactly alike. Then. the uniform templates are the same.

you dont see the serifs on san diego do you? they arent alike.

[WSU151]

yeah there is. the script is relatively similar and try and tell me the sd and the dc aren't almost exactly alike. Then. the uniform templates are the same.

Easy.

The SD and DC aren't alike at all. I would never confuse the two. Other than that, the two identities are...completely different.

By the way, I don't mean to be rude, but don't say "almost exactly". Ever. It doesn't make any sense.

Off hand, I noticed something weird when looking at the Padres' "SanDiego" script. Maybe it's just me, but it's like being in a circular room, with the S and the O closest to you on either side. Anyone else get that feeling? It's hard to explain. Sorry

[NJTank]

No they are not the same the fonts are different and the bridging of the script is different.

[Cashcleaner]

There are far more difference between them than there are similarities. Although, you would have to admit over time, with more and more teams being formed and logos being designed it's only logical some will start to look like others out of comparison with the rest.

[See Red]

Eh, I see a similarity. especially if you look at the N's in each logo. But it's not a big deal

[STL FANATIC]

I see a pretty large chunk of similarity.

But, I don't think it's anything to complain over (not saying you were).

They are seperate enough.

[gosioux76]

If there's any similarities at all it's a similar school of thought. They're both examples of a modern baseball uniform design. but when you get down to specifics, they're not even remotely alike. Sorry man.

[wheateater]

If you consider how many baseball teams have overlapping letters for their cap logos and how many use a hadnwritten-type script, then you could prolly say half the teams in baseball look hugely similar. They don't, in reality. It's just that those are characteristics of baseball that are none too common in the other big sports.

[Chazberg]

I can't see the link

[Brian in Boston]

Aside from the fact that the "SD" and "DC" are both interlocking, I can't see any other similarities between the two teams' identity packages.

Fonts? Different.

Layout of the wordmark? Different.

Colors? Different.

Oh... wait. Both teams will wear uniforms.

Seriously... not similar.

[slapshot]

Wait! I've got it....

neither one says "Montreal"

[HurricaneDavid]

They are somewhat similar, but not nearly as similar as the Nationals and Fuddruckers logos.

[Gothamite]

Just to add my 2 cents, I don't see anything more than the slightest similarity between them.

They're each unique identities.

[tohasbo]

No difference in my eyes between the two.