Jump to content

Horrible NHL logos


JBPerry

Recommended Posts

I'll agree that there are some pretty bad NHL logos, but the same applies to most sports universally. The Boston Bruins and Canadiens are two that I have no liking for, but with the sport as traditional as it is, change for some of the more recognized teams is a tad difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll agree that there are some pretty bad NHL logos, but the same applies to most sports universally. The Boston Bruins and Canadiens are two that I have no liking for, but with the sport as traditional as it is, change for some of the more recognized teams is a tad difficult.

You can't call the Bruins and Canadiens logo "bad" without calling the Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc. logos "bad".

Not saying they're necessarily bad... but they're all from a similar period of design, and the same period has affected each league evenly.

I don't think any single pro league definitely outrates another in turns of design. Every league has a team that struggles from poor design (the Bobcats, Mooterus, Bills, Pirates... no offense if you like their stuff). They all have their own teams with classic looks, and looks that may one day be considered classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Stars alternate logo looks like a diagram of the female reproductive system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll agree that there are some pretty bad NHL logos, but the same applies to most sports universally.  The Boston Bruins and Canadiens are two that I have no liking for, but with the sport as traditional as it is, change for some of the more recognized teams is a tad difficult.

You can't call the Bruins and Canadiens logo "bad" without calling the Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc. logos "bad".

Ok.

The Bruins, Canadiens, Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, and that team that's named Etc have bad logos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll agree that there are some pretty bad NHL logos, but the same applies to most sports universally.  The Boston Bruins and Canadiens are two that I have no liking for, but with the sport as traditional as it is, change for some of the more recognized teams is a tad difficult.

You can't call the Bruins and Canadiens logo "bad" without calling the Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc. logos "bad".

Ok.

The Bruins, Canadiens, Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, and that team that's named Etc have bad logos.

OK, so their logo is a little bland

ETC.JPG

But they kicked ass last year! They swept i.e. and e.g., and even beat p.s. in overtime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so their logo is a little bland

ETC.JPG

But they kicked ass last year! They swept i.e. and e.g., and even beat p.s. in overtime

They lost to et. al. when it really mattered, though...

Well yeah, but losing to et. al. is no disgrace.

Those guys had hyphens and exclamation points to spare even with all their starting commas on injured reserve. I don't know how they do it in this age of the salary cap. Maybe the league will change some rules next year to even things out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yeah, but losing to et. al. is no disgrace.

Those guys had hyphens and exclamation points to spare even with all their starting commas on injured reserve. I don't know how they do it in this age of the salary cap. Maybe the league will change some rules next year to even things out.

Well grammar and punctuation change with the times--especially when we need to generate more offense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't call the Bruins and Canadiens logo "bad" without calling the Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc. logos "bad".

That's what I said in the post. All leagues have some bad logos and I don't think the NHL is different. I DO consider the Packers, Yankees, and Red Sox having bad logos. Well, maybe not bad, but not the best. And that's no slight towards the team, just their image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll agree that there are some pretty bad NHL logos, but the same applies to most sports universally.  The Boston Bruins and Canadiens are two that I have no liking for, but with the sport as traditional as it is, change for some of the more recognized teams is a tad difficult.

You can't call the Bruins and Canadiens logo "bad" without calling the Packers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc. logos "bad".

Not saying they're necessarily bad... but they're all from a similar period of design, and the same period has affected each league evenly.

I don't think any single pro league definitely outrates another in turns of design. Every league has a team that struggles from poor design (the Bobcats, Mooterus, Bills, Pirates... no offense if you like their stuff). They all have their own teams with classic looks, and looks that may one day be considered classic.

oh i disagree,

you can call the canadiens logo good and still call the packers logo bad. i personally believe all those mentioned should be modernized or changed. no sense in having the same yankees logo since the civil war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.