rebelx Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 I was wondering what everyone thought about the possibility of Terrell Davis and/or Eddie George going to Canton. I'm personally leaning toward a "no" on Davis, and a "yes" on George. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred T. Jane Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 You say no to a rusher with the best 3 year span of rushing in history, yet say yes to a guy who barely cracked 10,000 yards?Explain that to me please. [Croatia National Team Manager Slavan] Bilic then went on to explain how Croatia's success can partially be put down to his progressive man-management techniques. "Sometimes I lie in the bed with my players. I go to the room of Vedran Corluka and Luka Modric when I see they have a problem and I lie in bed with them and we talk for 10 minutes." Maybe Capello could try getting through to his players this way too? Although how far he'd get with Joe Cole jumping up and down on the mattress and Rooney demanding to be read his favourite page from The Very Hungry Caterpillar is open to question. --The Guardian's Fiver, 08 September 2008 Attention: In order to obtain maximum enjoyment from your stay at the CCSLC, the reader is advised that the above post may contain large amounts of sarcasm, dry humour, or statements which should not be taken in any true sort of seriousness. As a result, the above poster absolves himself of any and all blame in the event that a forum user responds to the aforementioned post without taking the previous notice into account. Thank you for your cooperation, and enjoy your stay at the CCSLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CZzyzx41 Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 I'm saying no to both. TD had a great 3 year run but that's not enough for me. George was never dominant and as Fred pointed out, barely cracked 10,000 yards. Good play gentlemen but you are the Vada Pinson and Al Oliver of running backs. Decent stats but not quite enough to be considered. -DanielCheck Out My Podcast! Latest Episode 273: The Color BlinkyLatest Photo Upload: January 7, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 You say no to a rusher with the best 3 year span of rushing in history, yet say yes to a guy who barely cracked 10,000 yards?Explain that to me please.I'm going to have to agree with Fred here.Davis, defenatly, George, probablly not. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigga Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 Allow me to borrow the noted eloquence of one Mr. Lamar Thomas, "HELL 2 DA NAW!" On January 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, NJTank said: Btw this is old hat for Notre Dame. Knits Rockne made up George Tip's death bed speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Record Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 I'm a Titans fan and I don't think George will get in. He was a great back, but unfortunately not a HOF'er. If he would've signed the contract offered in TN he might have had a chance. It would have extended his career by a year or two. When Reese gives Fisher a vet, Fisher is loyal to a fault. Chris Brown was injury prone and Eddie would've padded his stats some. Enough? I don't know, but maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shumway Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 I'd say no for both of them, although between the two, TD would be the better bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rock55choc Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 Simple. No and no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Terrell Davis yes he was a dominant runner, had MVP seasons, Offensive Player of the Year, Super BOwl MVP, and a 2000 yard seasonGeorge No he was good but broke down too soon and was not dominant enough www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred T. Jane Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Terrell Davis yes he was a dominant runner, had MVP seasons, Offensive Player of the Year, Super BOwl MVP, and a 2000 yard seasonI'd say no because the "dominant runner" phase of his career was only three seasons. After that, because of injuries, the production fell precipitously.Put it this way: If TD and the Mile High Salute go into Canton, he had better be on the potium with Bo Jackson. After all, who else could put over 2000 yards in 36 games as abackup to Marcus Allen? [Croatia National Team Manager Slavan] Bilic then went on to explain how Croatia's success can partially be put down to his progressive man-management techniques. "Sometimes I lie in the bed with my players. I go to the room of Vedran Corluka and Luka Modric when I see they have a problem and I lie in bed with them and we talk for 10 minutes." Maybe Capello could try getting through to his players this way too? Although how far he'd get with Joe Cole jumping up and down on the mattress and Rooney demanding to be read his favourite page from The Very Hungry Caterpillar is open to question. --The Guardian's Fiver, 08 September 2008 Attention: In order to obtain maximum enjoyment from your stay at the CCSLC, the reader is advised that the above post may contain large amounts of sarcasm, dry humour, or statements which should not be taken in any true sort of seriousness. As a result, the above poster absolves himself of any and all blame in the event that a forum user responds to the aforementioned post without taking the previous notice into account. Thank you for your cooperation, and enjoy your stay at the CCSLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJMorris3 Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Call it the Gale Sayers rule; Terrell gets in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 DEFINITELY YES, TO BOTH. Both Great rushers. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winters in buffalo Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 I can't see either one getting in. George was good, but not great, and Davis simply didn't play enough seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacker12 Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Call it the Gale Sayers rule; Terrell gets in.I was just about to mention that. If Gale Sayers can get into Canton even though they didn't play 10 years, the Terrell Davis can, too. When he was healthy, he was by far the best running back in football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred T. Jane Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Call it the Gale Sayers rule; Terrell gets in.I was just about to mention that. If Gale Sayers can get into Canton even though they didn't play 10 years, the Terrell Davis can, too. When he was healthy, he was by far the best running back in football.So was Priest Holmes, so is he going to Canton also? [Croatia National Team Manager Slavan] Bilic then went on to explain how Croatia's success can partially be put down to his progressive man-management techniques. "Sometimes I lie in the bed with my players. I go to the room of Vedran Corluka and Luka Modric when I see they have a problem and I lie in bed with them and we talk for 10 minutes." Maybe Capello could try getting through to his players this way too? Although how far he'd get with Joe Cole jumping up and down on the mattress and Rooney demanding to be read his favourite page from The Very Hungry Caterpillar is open to question. --The Guardian's Fiver, 08 September 2008 Attention: In order to obtain maximum enjoyment from your stay at the CCSLC, the reader is advised that the above post may contain large amounts of sarcasm, dry humour, or statements which should not be taken in any true sort of seriousness. As a result, the above poster absolves himself of any and all blame in the event that a forum user responds to the aforementioned post without taking the previous notice into account. Thank you for your cooperation, and enjoy your stay at the CCSLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Call it the Gale Sayers rule; Terrell gets in.I was just about to mention that. If Gale Sayers can get into Canton even though they didn't play 10 years, the Terrell Davis can, too. When he was healthy, he was by far the best running back in football.So was Priest Holmes, so is he going to Canton also?He was never the starting running back for a Super Bowl winning team, and doesn't have a SB MVP. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred T. Jane Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 He was never the starting running back for a Super Bowl winning team, and doesn't have a SB MVP.Neither did Gale Sayers, so the point is moot. The arguement for Davis' entry into Canton isn't Super Bowl wins, but rather his statistical dominance in the regular season over a 3 year span. It's just too small of a sample to even consider him for Sayers-esque consideration. As much as I like TD, I don't think he's Canton-worthy, as his entry would open Pandora's Box in terms of deserving players, much like Holmes, or even *shudder* Kurt Warner. [Croatia National Team Manager Slavan] Bilic then went on to explain how Croatia's success can partially be put down to his progressive man-management techniques. "Sometimes I lie in the bed with my players. I go to the room of Vedran Corluka and Luka Modric when I see they have a problem and I lie in bed with them and we talk for 10 minutes." Maybe Capello could try getting through to his players this way too? Although how far he'd get with Joe Cole jumping up and down on the mattress and Rooney demanding to be read his favourite page from The Very Hungry Caterpillar is open to question. --The Guardian's Fiver, 08 September 2008 Attention: In order to obtain maximum enjoyment from your stay at the CCSLC, the reader is advised that the above post may contain large amounts of sarcasm, dry humour, or statements which should not be taken in any true sort of seriousness. As a result, the above poster absolves himself of any and all blame in the event that a forum user responds to the aforementioned post without taking the previous notice into account. Thank you for your cooperation, and enjoy your stay at the CCSLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Id say yes to George because while his numbers werent amazing, they were still good, and on top of that, I also feel that players should be judged by their charictar as well when in consideration for the hall, and thats something George has no doubt. Its also a reason why id say no to Davis. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedawg22 Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 Call it the Gale Sayers rule; Terrell gets in.I was just about to mention that. If Gale Sayers can get into Canton even though they didn't play 10 years, the Terrell Davis can, too. When he was healthy, he was by far the best running back in football.No to Davis, and no to George. The Sayers rule doesn't apply to Davis, because Davis never did anything that seriously awed anyone or made them jump out of their seat. Not only did Sayers put up incredible numbers for 4 years, but he was the most electric and dangerous player in the league. In addition, the success of other, more mediocre backs (Anderson/Gary/Droughns) following Davis in Denver detracts slightly from his numbers.As for George, the only way he could get in is on sheer durability. He was a workhorse back that had a lot of 30 carry, 110 yard games, but a lot of players can do that. Most just can't do it as long as George. He was never a top 5 back in the league at any point in his career. oh ,my god ,i strong recommend you to have a visit on the website ,or if i'm the president ,i would have an barceque with the anthor of the articel . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 He was never the starting running back for a Super Bowl winning team, and doesn't have a SB MVP. Based on that logic Ottis Anderson is a hall of famer.I am a huge Eddie George fan and I always liked Terrell Davis. Both were very good players but neither one of them is even in the conversation when it comes to all time great running backs. Hall of Fame backs are guys like Jim Brown, Walter Payton, Emmitt Smith, Gayle Sayers, Eric Dickerson, Tony Dorsett, Earl Campbell, Barry Sanders etc.Davis and George are basically current versions Billy Sims or Joe Cribbs, very good players but not hall of famers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.