LogoHound Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 A little too detailed for a logo but, I kind of like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youcan'tseeme Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I like the actually cartoon part. Is the realistic looking Bonds also part of the logo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Maybe it's just me, but I read 756 HOURS rather than 756 HOME RUNS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogoHound Posted August 9, 2007 Author Share Posted August 9, 2007 Is the realistic looking Bonds also part of the logo?No, that's a McFarlane figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youcan'tseeme Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Maybe it's just me, but I read 756 HOURS rather than 756 HOME RUNS.SameIs the realistic looking Bonds also part of the logo?No, that's a McFarlane figure.Okay good, i was looking at it and was like what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwtrailtrekker Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 i dont like bonds. therefore, i dont like the design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I fixed it, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Wow: I don't like Bonds, and I don't like the logo. What a shock! But I think I can honestly say the former is not the cause of the latter in this case. This is just a muddled mess, clip-arty in the extreme, and it looks like the sort of thing Bonds himself might design. It's way too busy, visually and textually. "756 HRS" -- why the "HRS"? Is there some danger the viewer might not understand what the 756 refers to? And if so, how does the not entirely layman's abbreviation "HRS" help things? Then there's the orange-to-orange gradient on some of the type. Why? What possible aesthetic purpose is that supposed to server, other than letting the designer play with his kewl grafix toolz? The thin double outline, the drop shadow, the gradient -- this is all the sort of crap I used to do in like 1993 when I would stay late at the paper's office to play around on the design computer for the first time. The ribbon is interesting, actually. Making it into a near-ring; I like that. And it's nicely shaded. No complaints there. The cartoon Barry is sucky in a sort of almost-camp 1980s way; make the helmet a little less badly rendered and it could work.So drop the "HRS", re-render the "756" to not suck, clean up the cartoon a bit, and this could have had potential. But as it is, this is just a poor piece of design work. Then again, the overall aesthetic really captures what Barry is all about, and the particular ways in which he's so annoying, so perhaps on some meta level this is actually an awesome logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hecticbro Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I'm sorry, but that logo isn't worthy of the greatest slugger in history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_limey Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I'm sorry, but that logo isn't worthy of the greatest slugger in history.True, but it's not Hank Aaron's logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old School Fool Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I fixed it, lolGo away. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capn89 Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 It doesn't have needles or pills in it which makes it inaccurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 That Bonds looks somewhat computer generated. The logo is kind of silly. It's like it's the name of a new cartoon series where Barry defeats some evil galactic alliance by rubbing his body with clear and shooting lasers out of his bat. Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GottaDeal Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Go away.The truth hurts, doesn't it? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VC// Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I'm amazed Bonds still has supporters and that there are people that believe he didn't take roids. LETS GO PENGUINS! 5x Stanley Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I'm amazed Bonds still has supporters and that there are people that believe he didn't take roids.Hey, there's always a clueless minority in society: guys who think O.J.'s innocent, that man never landed on the moon, that JFK was shot by a conspiracy involving the CIA, FBI, Fidel Castro and/or the Mafia... guys like that. Clueless souls you have to simply pat on the head and say, "that's nice," then completely disregard on anything they ever say again based on their total lack of realistic credibility.That being said, the logo's missing a syringe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc51design Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 the logo is rubbish, could be much much better, who did it? lockerroom51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColeJ Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I'm amazed Bonds still has supporters and that there are people that believe he didn't take roids.i'm amazed there are still people who think that sports discussion belong in the sports logo forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VC// Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 If a logo involves a sport...i think discussing it is free game. LETS GO PENGUINS! 5x Stanley Cup Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted August 9, 2007 Share Posted August 9, 2007 I wonder what kind of agreement Bonds had with MLB for using the Giants logo? I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.