alwaysr92 Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/07/21/t-j-hou...-em-video-game/Anybody else read this? In my opinion, giving Housh a 91 rating is being generous, he's been in steady decline over the last few years. I still think he's a very good reciever, but mid-high 80's is what i would give him. Agree? Disagree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Why does Whoseyourmamma even care? He should just concentrate on playing REAL FOOTBALL, because Madden is just a video game, and has no influence on what happens on the field www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/07/21/t-j-hou...-em-video-game/Anybody else read this? In my opinion, giving Housh a 91 rating is being generous, he's been in steady decline over the last few years. I still think he's a very good reciever, but mid-high 80's is what i would give him. Agree? Disagree?He had a off season last year, but the two previous seasons were his best. Not sure he rates a 91, but he is hardly a bad receiver.That said, his boycotting the game is silly. "One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Why does Whoseyourmamma even care? He should just concentrate on playing REAL FOOTBALL, because Madden is just a video game, and has no influence on what happens on the fieldego, nothing more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fkaKrock5cent Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 I thought this was kinda funny to be honest. I don't care all that much if he doesn't play Madden for a year and I think he's just yapping to draw attention to himself. I bet he get's a copy just like everyone else... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee. Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 You know what's really funny? A whole wack of pro athletes were just in Vancouver, on their own dime, to help promote this year's batch of EA Sports titles.Dwight Howard and Serena Williams. ON THEIR OWN DIME. Just because they were a part of their respective titles (NBA Live, Wii Tennis).Let me repeat. ON THEIR OWN DIME BECAUSE THEY WERE THRILLED TO BE A PART OF THE EA SPORTS TITLES FOR 2010.Hoosh can suck a bag of Richards. I hope Hasselbeck throws away from him all season. Welcome to DrunjFlix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEW.ERA Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Madden is making it more realistic Matt Flynn and Brian Brohm are both in the high 50's we'll Rodgers is in the mid 80's a personally like this. JETS|PACK|JAYS|NUFC|BAMA|BOMBERS|RAPS|ORANJE| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 His loss. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysr92 Posted July 23, 2009 Author Share Posted July 23, 2009 http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/07/21/t-j-hou...-em-video-game/Anybody else read this? In my opinion, giving Housh a 91 rating is being generous, he's been in steady decline over the last few years. I still think he's a very good reciever, but mid-high 80's is what i would give him. Agree? Disagree?He had a off season last year, but the two previous seasons were his best. Not sure he rates a 91, but he is hardly a bad receiver.That said, his boycotting the game is silly.The reason i say steady decline, is that the year he had an off year was the year that Johnson didn't play as much. So the question is, were all those great years Housh had partly a byproduct of teams focusing more on OchoCinco? Also, Palmer, in my opinion, is a better quarterback than Hasselbeck. So this year in Seattle, where they dont have a super legitimate threat other than Housh will show how much he truly is worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB61 Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 They'll put him on the cover next year, he'll fully endorse it, then will suffer an injury that will mar the rest of his career and go back to boycotting it.I don't care whether I'm the sixth best WR in the league or the worst punter, I'd give anything to be in a video game where I didn't have to create myself.Another reason why the NFL sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Yawn. Whatever dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/07/21/t-j-hou...-em-video-game/Anybody else read this? In my opinion, giving Housh a 91 rating is being generous, he's been in steady decline over the last few years. I still think he's a very good reciever, but mid-high 80's is what i would give him. Agree? Disagree?He had a off season last year, but the two previous seasons were his best. Not sure he rates a 91, but he is hardly a bad receiver.That said, his boycotting the game is silly.The reason i say steady decline, is that the year he had an off year was the year that Johnson didn't play as much. So the question is, were all those great years Housh had partly a byproduct of teams focusing more on OchoCinco? Also, Palmer, in my opinion, is a better quarterback than Hasselbeck. So this year in Seattle, where they dont have a super legitimate threat other than Housh will show how much he truly is worth.He's gonna fail in Seattle because it's a scientifically proven fact that something in the damp Puget Sound air combines with the top layer of the skin on your hands and turns them instantly to stone. No really, a Seahawks fan told me this once. So they don't suck, it's just the air. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 He's gonna fail in Seattle because it's a scientifically proven fact that something in the damp Puget Sound air combines with the top layer of the skin on your hands and turns them instantly to stone.[Mod edit: Nope, still redacted.] US state flag concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 So then he's really gonna hate Madden 11 after the brutal season he's about to have with Seattle: Where wide receivers go to die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Off the top of my head my question is why isn't Greg Jennings or even Donald Driver rated higher then him?1000th post about the Packers? Didn't see that coming BEAR DOWN ARIZONA!2013/14 Tanks Picks Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckymack Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 He's not as good as he thinks he is. Houshmandzadeh's a consistent possession receiver, very capable of moving the chains. And that's about it. His name is more famous than he is, if that makes any sense. Sigs are for sissies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 He's gonna fail in Seattle because it's a scientifically proven fact that something in the damp Puget Sound air combines with the top layer of the skin on your hands and turns them instantly to stone.[Mod edit: Nope, still redacted.]C'mon now, no need to bring Puckguy's whosyourmomma into this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Off the top of my head my question is why isn't Greg Jennings or even Donald Driver rated higher then him?1000th post about the Packers? Didn't see that comingJennings, yes. Absolutely. He's the most underrated WR in the NFC IMO. Driver I'm not so sure about though. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChefShark Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 He's gonna fail in Seattle because it's a scientifically proven fact that something in the damp Puget Sound air combines with the top layer of the skin on your hands and turns them instantly to stone.[Mod edit: Nope, still redacted.]C'mon now, no need to bring Puckguy's whosyourmomma into this.sorry Curt, it had nothing to do with the object of your sick affection.Apparently, it was wrong for me to correctly single out a forum wrongdoer. What I should have done was tell another member that his sister partakes in beastiality or refer to a female member as "jailbait", seeing as how those are perfectly acceptable things to say around here US state flag concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEW.ERA Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Off the top of my head my question is why isn't Greg Jennings or even Donald Driver rated higher then him?1000th post about the Packers? Didn't see that comingJennings, yes. Absolutely. He's the most underrated WR in the NFC IMO. Driver I'm not so sure about though.Jennings will jump up into the Fitzgerald/Johnson talk very soon JETS|PACK|JAYS|NUFC|BAMA|BOMBERS|RAPS|ORANJE| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.