Jump to content

NFL Weekly Uniform Notes


Bmac

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Count me as the many who are already tired of seeing the AFL uniforms or "throwback" uniforms so much in 2009.

Its the New York JETS. Not the New York TITANS. Why would anyone want to even think about that embarrassing part of JETS history? Hopefully after this year, they are put away for good. They aren't a terrible looking uniform. They just aren't THE JETS.

Anyway, the Chargers will be in their chubby-inducing powder blue alts (although not as "rockin" as the powder blue throwbacks).

And the Bears will be in their Halloween orange alts this week against the Brownies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make that an even dozen thank you very much!

I miscounted. My appologies, sir. However, my point remains valid.

Of course it's valid. Hell, even when they MAKE the playoffs it usually ends in some embarrassing way.

See Duhe, A.J.; Gastineau, Mark; Byars, Keith; or Brien, Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bears in orange tops today.

Yes! i love these things once a year, they always wear them in late october (halloween) and usually play a crappy team (Browns) and destroy them in these tops, probably why they're stilll around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me as the many who are already tired of seeing the AFL uniforms or "throwback" uniforms so much in 2009.

That doesn't count. You hate when any team wears throwbacks even once.

Yeah, really. For ONE anniversary season you can deal with AFL Legacy games.

As for the Jets, well their choice of throwbacks are kind of limited, seeing as if they went with the obvious choice, the SB III set, very few people would notice the difference. They could always drop the throwbacks and go with alternates, but I don't want to see the Jets in black, thankyouverymuch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me as the many who are already tired of seeing the AFL uniforms or "throwback" uniforms so much in 2009.

That doesn't count. You hate when any team wears throwbacks even once.

Yeah, really. For ONE anniversary season you can deal with AFL Legacy games.

As for the Jets, well their choice of throwbacks are kind of limited, seeing as if they went with the obvious choice, the SB III set, very few people would notice the difference. They could always drop the throwbacks and go with alternates, but I don't want to see the Jets in black, thankyouverymuch.

I would have liked to see the Jets go with throwbacks from their first season as the Jets. There wouldn't be a significant change from their regular set, but the helmet logo would have the Jet on it instead of the oval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me as the many who are already tired of seeing the AFL uniforms or "throwback" uniforms so much in 2009.

That doesn't count. You hate when any team wears throwbacks even once.

Yeah, really. For ONE anniversary season you can deal with AFL Legacy games.

As for the Jets, well their choice of throwbacks are kind of limited, seeing as if they went with the obvious choice, the SB III set, very few people would notice the difference. They could always drop the throwbacks and go with alternates, but I don't want to see the Jets in black, thankyouverymuch.

I would have liked to see the Jets go with throwbacks from their first season as the Jets. There wouldn't be a significant change from their regular set, but the helmet logo would have the Jet on it instead of the oval.

that would be missing the REAL point of all this completely. Fans don't buy helmets... they buy jerseys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.