Jump to content

Redsikins


Carter23

Recommended Posts

redsikins1110.jpg

possible explanation, from a commenter at the dc sports bog:

Looks like the extra "I" was meant to overlap the back vertical line in "K" where the two sides of the jacket meet...this could just be poor QC on the manufacturer's part. Seem's like they're just a little off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess the manufacturer didn't think about accommodating breasts when it came to lettering on jackets

Which makes it look 100x better. Distortions caused by :censored: just serves to further enhance them, and to announce their presence. You don't love it when a shirt is stretched to the point where a button looks like it might pop off? How lame would it be if there was extra material there and nothing was pulling or getting tight?

If anything, it would look even better if it was "Redskiiins".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess the manufacturer didn't think about accommodating breasts when it came to lettering on jackets

Which makes it look 100x better. Distortions caused by :censored: just serves to further enhance them, and to announce their presence. You don't love it when a shirt is stretched to the point where a button looks like it might pop off? How lame would it be if there was extra material there and nothing was pulling or getting tight?

If anything, it would look even better if it was "Redskiiins".

Now now now, don't get me wrong, I certainly enjoy a shirt stretched to the breaking point by womanly attributes. All I'm saying is that the wordmark could've been placed in a better position (upper left of the front) rather than across the front as if the jacket was designed for non-attributed persons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.