nash61 Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 Needs this uni: On September 20, 2012 at 0:50 AM, 'CS85 said: It's like watching the hellish undead creakily shuffling their way out of the flames of a liposuction clinic dumpster fire. On February 19, 2012 at 9:30 AM, 'pianoknight said: Story B: Red Wings go undefeated and score 100 goals in every game. They also beat a team comprised of Godzilla, the ghost of Abraham Lincoln, 2 Power Rangers and Betty White. Oh, and they played in the middle of Iraq on a military base. In the sand. With no ice. Santa gave them special sand-skates that allowed them to play in shorts and t-shirts in 115 degree weather. Jesus, Zeus and Buddha watched from the sidelines and ate cotton candy. POTD 5/24/12, POTD 2/26/17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 And when it comes to the throwback uniforms, I read somewhere that they can only use throwbacks that are owned by MLB. I guess many of the vintage stuff's rights are no longer owned by MLB. IDK if any of this is true, but that's what I've read. Makes sense though when you see all the strange throwbacks that are included.All throwback uniforms are owned by MLB, and licensed under the Cooperstown Collection label. Anything sold with Cooperstown Collection label belongs to MLB. You'll notice that The Show has the Cooperstown Collection license, but not access to all of the uniforms. The Show doesn't even have throwbacks that are sold in stores either (ie Aaron white-panel Braves, White-panel Orioles, red Red Sox hat, and many others). My guess is The Show's developer is spouting BS about MLB not owning rights(99% likely) - again, as I understand, MLB owns rights to all uniforms. Realistically, The Show only has a partial license to Cooperstown Collection and can only select certain uniforms for the game (99% likely) Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botiger Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 I hate how they usually have the all-star generic jerseys in the all-star game instead of the players wearing their individual team uniforms. I remember some of the EA Sports baseball games and they did it right. Why can't Sony?They tried to and it caused a huge hit in framerate. I also never recalled MVP Baseball having team uniforms, eitherI know they had it when the series was "Triple Play" instead of "MVP". Why were they able to do it on the older systems but not now on the big PS3??2k bought the exclusive third-party license. However, the console manufacturers can still get the MLB license.What does that have to do with what we are talking about??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 And when it comes to the throwback uniforms, I read somewhere that they can only use throwbacks that are owned by MLB. I guess many of the vintage stuff's rights are no longer owned by MLB. IDK if any of this is true, but that's what I've read. Makes sense though when you see all the strange throwbacks that are included.All throwback uniforms are owned by MLB, and licensed under the Cooperstown Collection label. Anything sold with Cooperstown Collection label belongs to MLB. You'll notice that The Show has the Cooperstown Collection license, but not access to all of the uniforms. The Show doesn't even have throwbacks that are sold in stores either (ie Aaron white-panel Braves, White-panel Orioles, red Red Sox hat, and many others). My guess is The Show's developer is spouting BS about MLB not owning rights(99% likely) - again, as I understand, MLB owns rights to all uniforms. Realistically, The Show only has a partial license to Cooperstown Collection and can only select certain uniforms for the game (99% likely)I can't believe that MLB would license all the current teams to them, but then turn around and license the Cooperstown Collection stuff piecemeal.Far more likely that they just didn't want to be bothered with it. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrAwesomeberry Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 I hate how they usually have the all-star generic jerseys in the all-star game instead of the players wearing their individual team uniforms. I remember some of the EA Sports baseball games and they did it right. Why can't Sony?They tried to and it caused a huge hit in framerate. I also never recalled MVP Baseball having team uniforms, eitherI know they had it when the series was "Triple Play" instead of "MVP". Why were they able to do it on the older systems but not now on the big PS3??2k bought the exclusive third-party license. However, the console manufacturers can still get the MLB license.What does that have to do with what we are talking about???Oh, I thought you meant why there is no MVP on the PS3. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted March 12, 2011 Share Posted March 12, 2011 Phillies throwback jerseys have the numbers way lower than they actually were.Also, the P on the throwback cap looks too fat and doesn't appear to have the swirl in it. The jerseys didn't have a swirl until '86 or '87 but the cap always did.Their alternate red cap with blue brim hasn't been used since '07. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botiger Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 I hate how they usually have the all-star generic jerseys in the all-star game instead of the players wearing their individual team uniforms. I remember some of the EA Sports baseball games and they did it right. Why can't Sony?They tried to and it caused a huge hit in framerate. I also never recalled MVP Baseball having team uniforms, eitherI know they had it when the series was "Triple Play" instead of "MVP". Why were they able to do it on the older systems but not now on the big PS3??2k bought the exclusive third-party license. However, the console manufacturers can still get the MLB license.What does that have to do with what we are talking about???Oh, I thought you meant why there is no MVP on the PS3. My bad.I sure wish there were!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 I'm having some issues with finding how legit the Giants jerseys with the reversed sleeve patches are. I've heard thats a change they'll be making so we'll just have to wait and see on that one. One thing they STILL haven't fixed is the reversed colors on the MLB logo on the back of the jerseys. I'll look for more here in a bit and update the A's too. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian E Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 the mets '86 throwbacks are BADLY butchered. in the game, they're depicted with having no names on the back, no font number and far too thin racing stripes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmackman Posted March 17, 2011 Author Share Posted March 17, 2011 Milwaukee BrewersCurrent Road Uniform - The current road uniforms are spot on. I have no problems with them at all. They're exactly as the Brewers look. The hat, jersey, and pants are all correct.Current Road Alternate - Again, no problems here. Navy hat, navy jersey with the Milwaukee script, proper names and numbers. The regular road pants are paired up with the alternate jersey. I have no issues.Road Throwback - It appears that MLB 11 is going for the 1976 look here. This would be Hank Aaron's year with the Brewers, and his last as a Major Leaguer. Interesting choice considering the 1982 teams are the fan favorites by far. Anyways, I'll work with what I've got here.The hat and helmet are correct, and while the jersey has the right idea, this should not be a button down shirt. In 1976 they used pullover jerseys. I'm guessing this has more to do with coding within a template though, and it's probably unfixable. The sleeve stripes are the right colors, but they're way too thin. In the 70s, Milwaukee had really thick sleeve stripes! There should not be belt loops on the pants because it should be an elastic waistband. However, again, I think this is a template issue. Finally, and possibly the most important error is the fact that these jerseys should NOT have names on the back! The current font was used which is wrong, but despite the replica jerseys being sold in the stores having names, in reality Milwaukee had no names on the back during this era.Road Throwback Old - This 1970 first year uniform for Milwaukee is actually not bad at all! The numbers on the back should be switched in color. Yellow numbers with a blue outline for this era, but the rest of it is actually pretty correct.Road Warmup - Road Warmup uniforms are spot on.Current Home Uniform - Current Home Uniform looks great.Current Home Alternate - Current Home Alternate is mostly okay, however, one major error... What's with the light blue? In reality, the Brewers alternate uniforms should be using the same blue that was used on the "Throwback" and "Throwback Old." The sort of bright royal blue that the Brewers have used for most of their existence. Sorry, but the light blue looks terrible! Get it closer to the Mets/Royals color of blue. Thanks.Home Throwback - Again this is the 1976 version. Same issues as the Road Throwback...no button down jersey (should be pullover), no names on the back, much thicker sleeve stripes, and there should not be any belt loops.Home Throwback Old - This 1970 version looks right from what I can tell. I've looked up a lot of photographs to help jog my memory, but this seems to be okay.Home Warmup - Fine as is.Overall - It looks like an improvement from last season, however the Brewers still have a few glaring issues. The home alternate being the wrong color blue is huge. Also, what about the navy blue alternate jersey with the home script BREWERS? Was there just not room for it? Odd that they have the road version, but not the home version.Finally, please remove the 41st anniversary logo from Miller Park. Adding the new scoreboard was awesome, forgetting to remove the logo (let alone changing it from 40th to 41st) was quite shocking. In general the Brewers don't put any graphics on the grass behind home plate. "Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be eaten. Every morning in Africa, a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or a gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." - Unknown | Check out my articles on jerseys at Bacon Sports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmackman Posted March 17, 2011 Author Share Posted March 17, 2011 Atlanta Braves (by Jeff M.)Current Road Uniform - OKCurrent Road Alternate - OKRoad Throwback - Should have the official script logo on front. Color scheme is correct. Here are photos: http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/si_online/covers/images/1969/0818_large.jpg and http://www.hemispheresmagazine.com/images/2009/mar/meal/p077_Hemi_Mar09-2.jpgRoad Throwback Old - Is a grey version of Home Throwback Old. Photo: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51wLzYqMLDL.jpgRoad Warmup - OKCurrent Home Uniform - OKCurrent Home Alternate - OKHome Throwback - Should have the official script logo (minus the tomahawk) on the front. Here is a photo for comparison: Home Throwback Old - Should have the official script logo (minus the tomahawk), a different sans-serif numeric block font on the front and back, and should have solid navy piping running down the front of the jersey. Here is a photo for comparison: http://images.tvrage.com/people/18/52360.jpgHome Warmup - OKOverall - On a side note with another team...let them know about them botching the black Pirates alt (number is directly below the logo; it should be below and opposite of it), too. See if they can add the new Dodgers "Brooklyn" powder-blue alt. Thanks.The other inconsistency I noticed with the Pirates is that the Home and Road Throwback should be a V-neck jersey, not a button-up jersey. "Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be eaten. Every morning in Africa, a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or a gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." - Unknown | Check out my articles on jerseys at Bacon Sports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmackman Posted March 17, 2011 Author Share Posted March 17, 2011 Still Available:ArizonaAtlantaBaltimoreBostonChicago CubsChicago White SoxCincinnatiClevelandColoradoDetroitFloridaHoustonKansas CityLos Angeles AngelsLos Angeles DodgersMilwaukeeMinnesotaNew York MetsNew York YankeesOaklandPhiladelphiaPittsburghSan DiegoSan FranciscoSeattleSt. LouisTampa BayTexasTorontoWashington "Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be eaten. Every morning in Africa, a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or a gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." - Unknown | Check out my articles on jerseys at Bacon Sports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friarcanuck Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 I don't know if it's been mentioned yet, but I'd be happy if The Show had the correct logo on the Jays banners in Rogers Centre.To make the stadium truly authentic, throw up some Argos banners while you're at it too. Licensing be damned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 I don't know if it's been mentioned yet, but I'd be happy if The Show had the correct logo on the Jays banners in Rogers Centre.To make the stadium truly authentic, throw up some Argos banners while you're at it too. Licensing be damned!Didn't they fix that in 11? --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportswizard1983 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 I don't know if it's been mentioned yet, but I'd be happy if The Show had the correct logo on the Jays banners in Rogers Centre.To make the stadium truly authentic, throw up some Argos banners while you're at it too. Licensing be damned!Didn't they fix that in 11?Are you talking about the logo being the one they had when they won the World Series? If so, it is the correct logo on the banners. I have yet to play an actual game there, but i was in exhibition mode going to each stadium just to see the scoreboards and stuff and saw that the correct logos are on the banners. 2016 Orioles: 5-0, 1st in AL East Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 I don't know if it's been mentioned yet, but I'd be happy if The Show had the correct logo on the Jays banners in Rogers Centre.To make the stadium truly authentic, throw up some Argos banners while you're at it too. Licensing be damned!Didn't they fix that in 11?Are you talking about the logo being the one they had when they won the World Series? If so, it is the correct logo on the banners. I have yet to play an actual game there, but i was in exhibition mode going to each stadium just to see the scoreboards and stuff and saw that the correct logos are on the banners.Right, that's what I thought -- all previous versions had the 97-02 logo on the banners for some unknown reason --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmackman Posted March 23, 2011 Author Share Posted March 23, 2011 I don't know if it's been mentioned yet, but I'd be happy if The Show had the correct logo on the Jays banners in Rogers Centre.To make the stadium truly authentic, throw up some Argos banners while you're at it too. Licensing be damned!Didn't they fix that in 11?Are you talking about the logo being the one they had when they won the World Series? If so, it is the correct logo on the banners. I have yet to play an actual game there, but i was in exhibition mode going to each stadium just to see the scoreboards and stuff and saw that the correct logos are on the banners.Right, that's what I thought -- all previous versions had the 97-02 logo on the banners for some unknown reasonThe banners are correct, and they'll never put logos from another league's teams because that would cost a ton of money. "Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be eaten. Every morning in Africa, a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or a gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." - Unknown | Check out my articles on jerseys at Bacon Sports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 I've never seen these games, but couldn't they put a logo from a "create-a-team" type thing on the banners from the other sport teams? Wouldn't a banner with a fake logo be more accurate than no banner at all? "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanB06 Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 This is my Boston review taken from the Youtube video posted on page 2 since I don't have the game yet (I will update once I get it):CAPSHOME: Looks OK to me.ALTERNATE: Again, looks OK."THROWBACK"/"THROWBACK (OLD)": Slapping a slightly different "B" on the same-colored cap as the home does not a throwback make. Where's the '70s red cap? Or even the 1946 cap (different style B entirely?)BP: Good to go.UNIFORM TOPS:HOME: Nothing wrong as far as I can tell from the front. Script, again, may be too wide.ROAD: Couldn't really tell, but looks like the Hanging Sox patch on the left sleeve is a tad too small. Boston script appears to be too wide.HOME ALT: Nothing wrong as far as I can tell from the front. Script, again, may be too wide.ROAD ALT: Again, script too wide. Otherwise looks OK. Thought the blue was too dark, but apparently the Cool Base version and the double-knit version are two different blues (at least the photos from MLB Shop suggest it).HOME "THROWBACK": HAS THE WRONG SCRIPT. Should be the same as the regular home. And what era is this replicating, anyway? If they were trying to match the 1969-72 jersey, it shouldn't have any piping on it.ROAD "THROWBACK" Nice try. The only era where the Red Sox roadie looked like that was 1969-72, and if that's what they were shooting for, then the letters are spaced too far across (should be BOS TON, like all other roadies of the 60's).ROAD "THROWBACK" (OLD): See above. It's identical.ROAD BP: 2010 design (probably). No longer solid blue. Apparently it is indeed the new design. My bad.HOME BP: Again, 2010 design (probably). See above.Pants look OK.Most of the Philly stuff has been covered already, but here are my quick comments:The star-in-P alt cap is still in there (gone in 2007). It's listed as a road alternate, but still. (EDIT: Thanks, BBTV. Got the date wrong.)Road throwback jersey is the 1973-83 design, but the front number is WAY too low. Should be aligned with the bottom of the P.Road throwback "old" jersey design is supposed to be either the early 70s version or the late '80s version, but should have the P with the swirl in the middle rather than the one they went with. And the front number's too low.Road BP appears, again, to be the 2010 design. Did the new stuff not make it in?Regular home and home alt look OK. Home throwback matches era of 1973-83, but again, front number is too low.Home throwback "old" jersey suffers from same problem as the road, wrong P. And did I mention the front number is too low?Home BP is again the 2010 design.That's it for now, once I get the game and delve into it more I'll revise. Sodboy13 said: As you watch more basketball, you will learn to appreciate the difference between "defense" and "couldn't find the rim with a pair of bloodhounds and a Garmin." meet the new page, not the same as the old page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrAwesomeberry Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 I guess I will do the Rangers. Just going off of the video here.CAPSThe only issue I see is that the throwback home hat is the same as the throwback old home hat. It should be the same as the road throwback.JERSEYSAll of the current jerseys look fine, as well as the road throwback. However, both of the old throwbacks from 1977 are inaccurate. Those jerseys had a unique two-button henley design on them. This patch was also on the right sleeve. Also, it appears the script and the number on the home throwback need a red outline around them. Also, it features a striping style on the sleeves that was not on those jerseys.PANTSThe only issue I see here is that the old throwback pants do not have the elastic belt from the 70s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.