Berlin Wall Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Leicester: I'm a simple person, I have a pixelated David Beckham as profile photo since 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlin Wall Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Gladbach: I'm a simple person, I have a pixelated David Beckham as profile photo since 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Nice kit but the sponsor definitely takes it down overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Celtic Home: I really like what New Balance has been doing with their teams recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloo Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 I'm in the minority, but I like this Chelsea kit. It's simple and clean and I don't mind the lions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njdevs7 Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Look at how Celtic put on their sponsor compared to Mochengladbach. Makes such a big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 I really dislike the Celtic shirt. Not one of NB's best efforts. The gradient looks cheap and the rear sponsor is bad, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 11 hours ago, kloo said: I'm in the minority, but I like this Chelsea kit. It's simple and clean and I don't mind the lions. Yikes that is actually bad. Seriously, what. Leicester kit looks a bit better than what they have this season, but will have to wait and see... I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 47 minutes ago, aawagner011 said: I really dislike the Celtic shirt. Not one of NB's best efforts. The gradient looks cheap and the rear sponsor is bad, too. Agreed on this back sponsor and all back sponsors in general, but I don't mind the gradient that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 Just saw this - Leicester City home is official: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 Is it just me or does it feel like a lot of football tops are hemmed off a little too high? It makes them look a bit top heavy for some reason, especially if they have a collar. I don't know, maybe I'd like to see them a little bit longer which I know is redundant if you have them tucked in, but most of the time they aren't, so. I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popmart Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 New Stoke Macron kits: "CUT FROM A DIFFERENT CLOTH | The new 16/17 Away shirt features an embossed S which adorned the first ever Stoke Kit back in 1882 #MadeInStoke" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlin Wall Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 Ajax away: I'm a simple person, I have a pixelated David Beckham as profile photo since 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaffa Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 41 minutes ago, aztex82 said: New Stoke Macron kits: "CUT FROM A DIFFERENT CLOTH | The new 16/17 Away shirt features an embossed S which adorned the first ever Stoke Kit back in 1882 #MadeInStoke" I'm not keen on plain backs on striped/hooped shirts, however I've just read on Stoke's website... As the Premier League are looking to introduce a rule to enforce squad number visibility to complement UEFA’s rules for clubs playing in European competition, we have incorporated a white panel on the reverse of the shirt. Please say it isn't so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pepis21 Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 What wrong with you Premier League?! First you introduce a new logo, which is completely unnecessary, now this rule about plain back, oh c'mon! Liverpool third: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 2 hours ago, Jaffa said: I'm not keen on plain backs on striped/hooped shirts, however I've just read on Stoke's website... As the Premier League are looking to introduce a rule to enforce squad number visibility to complement UEFA’s rules for clubs playing in European competition, we have incorporated a white panel on the reverse of the shirt. Please say it isn't so. They probably wanted to wear red numbers and obviously it would be near impossible to read on red and white stripes. No leaks on the new numbers yet either. I wonder if wwe'll see them on the final day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsaline Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 Liverpool third looks great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaffa Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 25 minutes ago, MJWalker45 said: They probably wanted to wear red numbers and obviously it would be near impossible to read on red and white stripes. No leaks on the new numbers yet either. I wonder if wwe'll see them on the final day. How their site is worded it seems they think it likely that they'll be required to have a plain back in the near future, so they're taking the opportunity to go with red numbers. They've worn the League's standard blue numbers with their stripes in recent years, of course. It sounds like this ruling is just being proposed but hasn't been passed yet - certainly, Sunderland's newly unveiled striped 2016/17 shirt doesn't feature a panel. Stoke may simply be 'future-proofing' their kit in case they want it to run for more than one season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 3 minutes ago, Jaffa said: How their site is worded it seems they think it likely that they'll be required to have a plain back in the near future, so they're taking the opportunity to go with red numbers. They've worn the League's standard blue numbers with their stripes in recent years, of course. It sounds like this ruling is just being proposed but hasn't been passed yet - certainly, Sunderland's newly unveiled striped 2016/17 shirt doesn't feature a panel. Stoke may simply be 'future-proofing' their kit in case they want it to run for more than one season. Teams need to go back to two year runs on their home kits anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YELDARBfield Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 3 hours ago, Berlin Wall said: Ajax away: "Yeah, we'll take the Seattle Pacific Blue look." (Still a sharp kit, tho.) Twitter • Facebook • Instagram • LinkedIn • Tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.