Rj0498 Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 One could hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnPheitseog Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Thats what im hoping for. i feel like Bauer was our only chance though. Formerly known as DiePerske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(probably)notabandwagonfan Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 22 hours ago, DiePerske said: This guy running the Indians Twitter needs to know that their winning percentage this postseason is higher in their white jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phutmasterflex Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 I think the only reason why they wore the white jersey was because the Sox were in their scheduled alts Go A's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverBullet1929 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 On 10/29/2016 at 9:25 PM, SCalderwood said: I feel like by wearing different uniforms every game in the series, they are actually diluting their identity/look/consistency even more than if they just stuck with the navy jerseys every game. The rest of your post made plenty of solid points but this one here stood out to me. If teams actually have a solid consistent identity throughout all their jerseys and their entire uniform set then what you said here wouldn't be a problem. Teams shouldn't have to wear the same jersey every game to maintain their identities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2016 World series patch on the cap is not the same as on the jersey. I would think it is a mistake somehow, what you guys think? Has this ever happened before in the history of wearing WS patches on caps and jerseys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BC985 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 5 minutes ago, Thomas said: 2016 World series patch on the cap is not the same as on the jersey. I would think it is a mistake somehow, what you guys think? Has this ever happened before in the history of wearing WS patches on caps and jerseys. 2006. The New Era reissue is incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnPheitseog Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 hours ago, SilverBullet1929 said: The rest of your post made plenty of solid points but this one here stood out to me. If teams actually have a solid consistent identity throughout all their jerseys and their entire uniform set then what you said here wouldn't be a problem. Teams shouldn't have to wear the same jersey every game to maintain their identities. This all makes perfect sense to me in the regular season, but there comes a point where primaries should be primaries. Formerly known as DiePerske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BC985 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 9 minutes ago, Thomas said: 2016 World series patch on the cap is not the same as on the jersey. I would think it is a mistake somehow, what you guys think? Has this ever happened before in the history of wearing WS patches on caps and jerseys. Same goes for 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I see, thanks. Kinda weird that sometimes the cap/jersey logos are the same and sometimes they are not, wouldn't you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BC985 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 5 minutes ago, Thomas said: I see, thanks. Kinda weird that sometimes the cap/jersey logos are the same and sometimes they are not, wouldn't you agree? 2006 is weird since the sleeve patch would have made a fine hat patch. I prefer the '04 hat patch to the sleeve patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 minutes ago, Brandon9485 said: 2006 is weird since the sleeve patch would have made a fine hat patch. I prefer the '04 hat patch to the sleeve patch. Yes, but 04 was a :censored:ty WS compared to 06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenTino Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I like this year's hat patch with the trophy in the background much more than the sleeve patch. It just looks like a more finished product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKzqSKyGXmw http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/19224580/v1209291383/behind-the-scenes-at-the-majestic-factory/?query=majestic Two videos that show the 2016 WS jerseys being made, look at all those grey and white Indians jerseys that will not be worn, LOL And what do you think, can Under Armour do as good a job as Majestic does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anubis2051 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2009 was different as well: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Wow, thanks for the photo. Wonder who makes the decision, different or same patch. Could it be the league or jersey/cap manufacturer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 hours ago, Thomas said: Wow, thanks for the photo. Wonder who makes the decision, different or same patch. Could it be the league or jersey/cap manufacturer. The league designs the patches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 8 hours ago, Anubis2051 said: 2009 was different as well: That is still my favorite World Series patch to date(the jersey patch). Love the use of fall colors (red and orange) and the interlocking leaves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinsUp1214 Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I really, really dug 2011's: An absolutely heartbreaking, gut-punching series on the field (I was rooting for the Rangers), but still the one I think had the best executed imagery of the recent ones. Taking "Fall Classic" seriously in its branding was a perfect move, and something that should have been continued. I've been dissapointed to see every series since then not take advantage of that opportunity. Heck, I'd have been perfectly fine with that very logo becoming a templated system that ran on from there, I thought it was that brilliant. Maybe darken the green a little bit if you have to make a change, but other than that? Solid, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 13 hours ago, FinsUp1214 said: I really, really dug 2011's: An absolutely heartbreaking, gut-punching series on the field (I was rooting for the Rangers), but still the one I think had the best executed imagery of the recent ones. Taking "Fall Classic" seriously in its branding was a perfect move, and something that should have been continued. I've been dissapointed to see every series since then not take advantage of that opportunity. Heck, I'd have been perfectly fine with that very logo becoming a templated system that ran on from there, I thought it was that brilliant. Maybe darken the green a little bit if you have to make a change, but other than that? Solid, in my opinion. I prefer the red/orange of the 2009 logo but that by far has the best word mark. I'd love to see a hybrid logo with the 2011 word mark and the 2009 colors... (I'm just not a fan of the green/orange. It just seems to drab compared to the 2009 colors, to me at least) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.