SFGiants58 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 How about the mask and sticks with no backing shape (black stroke on the mask and sticks remaining)? Wouldn't that work? Quote MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEANS Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 I would try using just the triangle/sector shape not just the circle. Quote https://www.andrewsterlachini.com/ or http://dribbble.com/MEANS1974 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seasaltvanilla Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 Pizza slice only Pizza slice recolored/resized in a way I think makes more sense (and gets ride of the beveling on the sticks, which I think looks dumb). My preferred look overall No pizza no puck No pizza no puck gold sticks 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolingian Steamroller Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 27 minutes ago, seasaltvanilla said: Pizza slice only Pizza slice recolored/resized in a way I think makes more sense (and gets ride of the beveling on the sticks, which I think looks dumb). My preferred look overall No pizza no puck No pizza no puck gold sticks How about a black pizza with gold sticks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 1 hour ago, CreamSoda said: The logo definitely feels much more balanced with the sector. But there is no need for the random white stroke. Nowhere else in the logo is there a double stroke like that. It would look much cleaner with a single black stroke like everywhere else in the logo: Huge improvement. This is the best of the mock-ups I've seen on this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seasaltvanilla Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 11 minutes ago, Carolingian Steamroller said: How about a black pizza with gold sticks? Burnt pizza 7 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolingian Steamroller Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 No joke, I'd always thought the black circle was a puck view at a 3/4 angle. The problem with all of this is that the original Duck logo is that none of the colors in the logo matched the jersey colors at the time: Because of this, there was never a real worry about the details inside the crest clashing with the jersey. Since the orange third jersey was introduced, there's been a effort to make it match. All of this is weird because orange was introduced into this pattern in 2005 as a total afterthought. There were these tiny strokes representing Orange County in an otherwise entire black and gold set. Now they're the most orange team in the league. More orange than the Flyers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 3 hours ago, seasaltvanilla said: No pizza no puck No pizza no puck gold sticks I see the issue here - it's too bottom-heavy a design without the slice of pizza. 3 Quote MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 If Yeti does in fact win the name contest, this company could sue for trademark infringement https://www.yeti.com They would have to become the Utah Yetis 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadSeed84 Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 49 minutes ago, Ark said: If Yeti does in fact win the name contest, this company could sue for trademark infringement https://www.yeti.com They would have to become the Utah Yetis I was hoping they'd make a Yeti cup their logo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 1 hour ago, Ark said: If Yeti does in fact win the name contest, this company could sue for trademark infringement https://www.yeti.com They would have to become the Utah Yetis Different industries with no cause for confusion. I don't think they'd have a case. 8 Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 9 hours ago, Morgan33 said: Huge improvement. This is the best of the mock-ups I've seen on this thread. I agree. This does look great. The overuse of thick white strokes is a bit much and this brings it back to where I feel okay about it. I still kind of like the logo without the 'sector' and just the black circle - it isn't offensive to me. But I do really like the logo above. it's pretty much spot on. None of the other experiments with the shape changes work for me, at all. Quote I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildwing64 Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 15 hours ago, Carolingian Steamroller said: All of this is weird because orange was introduced into this pattern in 2005 as a total afterthought. There were these tiny strokes representing Orange County in an otherwise entire black and gold set. Now they're the most orange team in the league. More orange than the Flyers. Unlike the gold, orange was always intended as part of the colour scheme for the 2006 rebrand. Early rumours suggested they were going to be green and orange. Per TruColor, they originally planned to go with a black, forest green, orange and bronze scheme. At some point Burke made a visit to West Point which likely led to them dumping green and swapping out bronze for gold. It was only after he left that the Ducks started gradually making orange more prominent. Quote PotD: 24/08/2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 2 hours ago, wildwing64 said: Unlike the gold, orange was always intended as part of the colour scheme for the 2006 rebrand. Early rumours suggested they were going to be green and orange. Per TruColor, they originally planned to go with a black, forest green, orange and bronze scheme. At some point Burke made a visit to West Point which likely led to them dumping green and swapping out bronze for gold. It was only after he left that the Ducks started gradually making orange more prominent. What a missed opportunity with green and orange. The only other professional sports team in the United States to use it in capacity are the Dolphins and their aqua is roughly only half-green. The Ducks really could've had something. I don't know about other people, but I have always hated when teams would base their identities off military academies. They seem to always result in the most bland and un-fun looks, with drab color schemes and shield logos that feel like the wrong style to go by for certain teams. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreamSoda Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 11 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said: Different industries with no cause for confusion. I don't think they'd have a case. I wonder if the cooler company being an NHL business partner causes some concern though. There are YETI ads on nhl boards so it would be kinda weird to have a team with the same name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 1 hour ago, CreamSoda said: I wonder if the cooler company being an NHL business partner causes some concern though. There are YETI ads on nhl boards so it would be kinda weird to have a team with the same name. Not from a lawsuit perspective. Do Redwing shoes advertise anywhere within an NHL arena? 2 Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 20 hours ago, Sec19Row53 said: Different industries with no cause for confusion. I don't think they'd have a case. But "Yeti" as a singular term seems unique, Yeti drinkware company could argue the "Yeti" team is taking from their brand. The Utah team can be the Yetis but "Yeti" is a drinkware company, and the singular name infringes on their trademark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blast_Brothers Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 Wasn't the rumor that the team name would be Yetis, plural? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted July 6 Share Posted July 6 16 minutes ago, Ark said: But "Yeti" as a singular term seems unique, Yeti drinkware company could argue the "Yeti" team is taking from their brand. The Utah team can be the Yetis but "Yeti" is a drinkware company, and the singular name infringes on their trademark. Sting and Sting. Redwing boots and the Red Wings. No risk of confusion. 1 Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnPheitseog Posted July 7 Share Posted July 7 12 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said: Sting and Sting. Redwing boots and the Red Wings. No risk of confusion. the bigger issue is that there's both the Detroit Red Wings(NHL) and the Rochester Red Wings(IL, MiLB). Both sports teams. And yet, it's not an issue. 1 Quote Formerly known as DiePerske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.