Nick 1733 Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Alright, I figured I should actually put together a logo for my Arena team that was actually a Blue Jay instead of my Cardinal logo. So here's what I've got, I'm putting it up to get some honest C&C to perfect it.For reference, here's the image I used for reference.http://www.clipartxp.com/Birds/BLUEJAY.jpg MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Tell you the truth, IMO, This is flawless, great job! | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMU Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 2 thoughts1-the lighter blue wedge is a tad too big... it seems forced in there and doesn't seem to flow2-thin out the outer blue outline around the eye. It makes the bird look like it's wearing glassesother than that, this is pretty gosh darn awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted May 14, 2006 Author Share Posted May 14, 2006 SECOND VERSION (with LMU's corrections) MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Both of them are very,very good BEAR DOWN ARIZONA!2013/14 Tanks Picks Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniguy22 Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Very good, but the beak seems to be too big for the rest of the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted May 14, 2006 Author Share Posted May 14, 2006 Very good, but the beak seems to be too big for the rest of the head. Too big in length or too big in heighth, or both? MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon_Matrix Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 I dunno...something seems to be missing. If you make the rest of the body, or somehow resape where the head ends it would work a little better. While I'm not a fan of the more realistic approach, I still think it is very well done. Try tweaking the neck and you may have a real flawless concept.EDIT: I now remember what this reminds me of, the Jackle Mask the ancient Eqyptians wore during ceremonies. If you make it less mask like...or human profile like it will be truely awesome! Because Korbyn Is Colour Blind, My Signature Is Now Idiot Proof - Thanks Again Braden!!Go Leafs Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Yeah, the bottom looks lacking, but otherwise, hey, it's great. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted May 14, 2006 Author Share Posted May 14, 2006 Third Version...What I did here is I edited the front bottom part of the neck and shortened it, I made the beak smaller.Now, with the neck, I did the same with the cardinal logo I made and cutting it off made it look worse. MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted May 14, 2006 Author Share Posted May 14, 2006 After some tweaking, I made the eye MUCH MORE animal/bird like instead of human like, thanks to comments from my little brother. MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanic Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 In my opinion, I think the latest tweak with the eye is a step backward. If you're intent on having the two-tone eye (which could work I think), you need to make the silver crescent wrap farther around the eye to make the blue "pupil" stand out more. Right now it's just a blob where the eye is supposed to be right now. It's a subtle difference but I think it would make it better. Great job overall. "In the arena of logic, I fight unarmed."I tweet & tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Looks nice Nick, only thing I would do was to make it look a tad meaner (fiercer), like what the AZ Cardinals did with their update, but I'll leave it up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Looks nice Nick, only thing I would do was to make it look a tad meaner (fiercer), like what the AZ Cardinals did with their update, but I'll leave it up to you. I completely agree...it just doesn't look intimidating at all. Great work thus far though, you have a great base to build upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 Looks nice Nick, only thing I would do was to make it look a tad meaner (fiercer), like what the AZ Cardinals did with their update, but I'll leave it up to you. I completely agree...it just doesn't look intimidating at all. Great work thus far though, you have a great base to build upon. I agree, make it look more fierce, it looks great so far. Can't wait to see the RM Bluejays with a wordmark as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHcreative Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 This logo looks really nice. I have to agree with epiphanic, the two toned eye looks better, and it does need to look a little fiercer IMO, other than that this is very nice, a huge improvement from what the Jays have now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick 1733 Posted May 14, 2006 Author Share Posted May 14, 2006 Here's what I've come up with after messing with the eye. MLB, NBA, NFL & NHL Font Packs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Clemente Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 It's rendered well. My main complaint about this logo is the GIGANTIC CHIN!!!! I would get rid of that bottom left thing altogether.I also wouldn't use the last eye you made there. It looks too feminine with those faux eyelashes. That little dark blue streak above the eye though, I'd use that.Just those two changes would make it look much cooler.--Roger "Time?" Clemente. Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 A. I think this is too ambiguous in style. It's not all that iconic, but also not terribly detailed. It floats in a middle ground somewhere between 'logo' and 'illustration.' I think you need to choose one or the other and develop it that way instead of trying to tiptoe along this stylistic fence.B. I think this bird has too many human characteristics. The cheek, the eye, the brow, the forehead, the shoulder. More reference. More research. More sketches.C. The way the bottom is cut is not very aesthetically pleasing and does not serve any purpose in helping the image. Also, I don't know that the rounded outline is the best choice, here. The light blue highlights on the head make the bird look shiny and plastic. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted May 14, 2006 Share Posted May 14, 2006 It's rendered well. My main complaint about this logo is the GIGANTIC CHIN!!!! The Toronto Blue Jay Lenos ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.