kewp80 Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 With some international flavor: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-1...p&type=lgnsI'm on the fence on this idea, some parts of me like it, but other parts don't. I think it would be a great way to expand the sport. Cardinals -- Rams -- Blues -- Tigers -- Liverpool Check out my music! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwtrailtrekker Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 i think itd be kinda cool to have some games internationally, especially if its halfway regional, such ascards vs. chargers in mexiconew england vs new york in englandbuffalo vs. lions in toronto, ca49ers vs. raiders in japanseahawks vs. vikings in vancouver, ca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 This might actually be a good idea. I also like the fact that they'll be doing things regionally. They could play 4 games in Germany (2 in Berlin and 2 in Munich), 4 games in Britain (2 in London proper, 2 in Wales at Millennium Stadium), 4 in Canada (2 in Toronto, 2 in Vancouver), and 4 in Latin America (2 in Mexico City, 2 somewhere else, maybe Guadalajara?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kewp80 Posted May 10, 2007 Author Share Posted May 10, 2007 I would do 2 in London and then 2 in Tokyo, since there has been games there before. I like NW's idea about havening it somewhat regional too. Cardinals -- Rams -- Blues -- Tigers -- Liverpool Check out my music! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 How about Steelers vs. anybody in Seoul, Korea? At least while Hines Ward, who was born in Seoul and has become something of a rock star in Korea, is still with the team? They could even set aside a section or two for U.S. troops stationed there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Posted May 10, 2007 Share Posted May 10, 2007 Im getting really exicted about the possibility of seeing the Seahawks in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I'd have no beef if the NFL used preseasons games to do something like this. But no way should it be a game that actually counts. The only other country where American Football has caught on is Germany. Attendance would sink like a rock everywhere else once the novelty wore off and we'd end up with games that have playoff implications being played in front of 20,000 people.I might be in favor of a 17th game at a neutral site in North America. For example, a Bears-Colts game at Notre Dame or a Cowboys-Texans game in San Antonio.Also, how would a 17th game work... does every team then play all intraconference teams that finished the same as them the previous year? Or maybe each team designated an annual inerconference rival? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 How about expand the regular season to 18 games, chop off two of these exhibitions, and have two games at neutral sites? They could be international games, or just areas where the NFL doesn't have a franchise (LA?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 How about expand the regular season to 18 games, chop off two of these exhibitions, and have two games at neutral sites? They could be international games, or just areas where the NFL doesn't have a franchise (LA?)That sounds good, but eventually the teams will want the home gate and they will be 9 home games. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Also, how would a 17th game work... does every team then play all intraconference teams that finished the same as them the previous year? Or maybe each team designated an annual inerconference rival?This would make the most sense. I think the NFL would love to have a meaningful rivalry game between such teams as Giants-Jets, Eagles-Steelers, 49ers-Raiders, and other cross-city/state/region games each season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Also, how would a 17th game work... does every team then play all intraconference teams that finished the same as them the previous year? Or maybe each team designated an annual inerconference rival?This would make the most sense. I think the NFL would love to have a meaningful rivalry game between such teams as Giants-Jets, Eagles-Steelers, 49ers-Raiders, and other cross-city/state/region games each season.I would like that, I think its unfortunate the Jets and Giants only play every four years www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OB33 Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 IIRC, the NFL wanted to institute something to that effect when league expanded to 32 teams but decided against it because of the teams that don't have that natural rival like Seattle, Buffalo, or Carolina. #CHOMPCHOMPCHOMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben5 Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Not a big fan of this. Do we really need another game, especially one where the majority of the fans will have no idea who is playing? Plus there will be one more chance for players to get hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDR Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I thought a little bit on the 17th game being an Interconference Rival. It's great for some teams, less so for others. I found that the NFC North was the hardest to create rivals for, since the whole division is steeped in their own rivalries, and geographically speaking, there's few teams THAT close to them. So, here's my best shot at the NFL Interconference Rivalry Weekend. Some are obvious connections. Some less obvious, some downright stretches.Tampa Bay v. Miami --3 FL teams, but...Carolina v. Jacksonville --Jax has the natural expansion counterpart thing going w/ CarolinaAtlanta v. Tennessee --Distance. Also, UGA/UT angle.New Orleans v. Indianapolis --Distance. Kind of an awkward fit.San Francisco v. Oakland --Natural. Battle of the BaySt. Louis v. Kansas City --Natural. Battle for MissouriSeattle v. San Diego --Awkward fit. It's the MLB rivalry.Arizona v. Denver --DistanceDallas v. Houston --Texas, obviously.Washington v. Baltimore --Natural.New York Giants v. New York Jets --NaturalPhiladelphia v. Pittsburgh --Natural.Detroit v. Cincinnati --A bit awkward. Battle of the Big Cats? A little Michigan/Ohio St. action, too.Minnesota v. Buffalo --Awkward. Cold climate teams. Basically, leftovers.Green Bay v. Cleveland --Arguably the two most tradition steeped teams in the game. Hard nosed fans.Chicago v. New England --Battle for Irish pride.So, there it is. Seems to be the best case scenario for all teams. Any suggestions, changes, backlash, hatred? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EatSleepJeep Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 How about expand the regular season to 18 games, chop off two of these exhibitions, and have two games at neutral sites? They could be international games, or just areas where the NFL doesn't have a franchise (LA?)That sounds good, but eventually the teams will want the home gate and they will be 9 home games.I think the principles of mathematics prohibit 9 home games and 8 road games for every team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Boy Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 NFL Interconference Rivalry Weekend. Some are obvious connections. Some less obvious, some downright stretches.MLB has a lot of forced rivalries for inter-league play and it is pretty much a joke. Red Sox vs. Braves? What kind of "rivalry" is that? The Braves left town more than 50 years ago. While there are still a handful of Braves fans in Boston, I think they'd rather see the Braves beat up on the Mets than the Sox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeytonManningRocks Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I thought a little bit on the 17th game being an Interconference Rival. It's great for some teams, less so for others. I found that the NFC North was the hardest to create rivals for, since the whole division is steeped in their own rivalries, and geographically speaking, there's few teams THAT close to them. So, here's my best shot at the NFL Interconference Rivalry Weekend. Some are obvious connections. Some less obvious, some downright stretches.Tampa Bay v. Miami --3 FL teams, but...Carolina v. Jacksonville --Jax has the natural expansion counterpart thing going w/ CarolinaAtlanta v. Tennessee --Distance. Also, UGA/UT angle.New Orleans v. Indianapolis --Distance. Kind of an awkward fit.San Francisco v. Oakland --Natural. Battle of the BaySt. Louis v. Kansas City --Natural. Battle for MissouriSeattle v. San Diego --Awkward fit. It's the MLB rivalry.Arizona v. Denver --DistanceDallas v. Houston --Texas, obviously.Washington v. Baltimore --Natural.New York Giants v. New York Jets --NaturalPhiladelphia v. Pittsburgh --Natural.Detroit v. Cincinnati --A bit awkward. Battle of the Big Cats? A little Michigan/Ohio St. action, too.Minnesota v. Buffalo --Awkward. Cold climate teams. Basically, leftovers.Green Bay v. Cleveland --Arguably the two most tradition steeped teams in the game. Hard nosed fans.Chicago v. New England --Battle for Irish pride.So, there it is. Seems to be the best case scenario for all teams. Any suggestions, changes, backlash, hatred?Well, Vikes-Bills could be the "0 for 4" Battle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC97 Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 How about expand the regular season to 18 games, chop off two of these exhibitions, and have two games at neutral sites? They could be international games, or just areas where the NFL doesn't have a franchise (LA?)That sounds good, but eventually the teams will want the home gate and they will be 9 home games.I think the principles of mathematics prohibit 9 home games and 8 road games for every team.Lesson to the kiddies... before you act like a smart ass, check to make sure you know what you're talking about.18 = 9 + 9 --- Chris Creamer Founder/Editor, SportsLogos.Net  "The Mothership" • News • Facebook • X/Twitter • Instagram Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac the Knife Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 How about expand the regular season to 18 games, chop off two of these exhibitions, and have two games at neutral sites? They could be international games, or just areas where the NFL doesn't have a franchise (LA?)That sounds good, but eventually the teams will want the home gate and they will be 9 home games.Actually Tank the deal worked out during the 2001 realignment (and yes, before anyone tries to correct me, it didn't take effect until 2002 but it was agreed upon in 2001) also spelled out new, rather generous terms for visiting teams in terms of gate split, and presuming that a neutral site/international game's gate would be split 50/50, I'd think it'd work out pretty close anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 4 in Latin America (2 in Mexico City, 2 somewhere else, maybe Guadalajara?)Buenos Aires? It's great to be young and a Giant! - Larry Doyle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.