M59 Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 Why do teams keep getting halfway with their powder blues??? Royals, Rays, Brewers: Please get powder blue jerseys AND pants!!! (including city names, no less)Matching powder blue jerseys with white pants is like matching gray jerseys with white pants... It just doesn't work...-- $0.02 --I totally agree on the city names. Baltimore & Washington figured it out this year. Milwaukee needs to be on the Brewers' road jerseys.Orioles and Nationals almost figured it out this year. Both, however, wound up with unnecessary split letters on the road jerseys. I don't care much for or about the Nationals, but the split "t" on the "Baltimore" jerseys--which often winds up looking like "Balttimore"--just bugs the hell out of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 Just like I know Brian Stokes and Angel Pagan are household names in my humble quarters. I have Stokes autograph, so I know him.I don't think the Dodgers need another patch. They have had enough patches recentlyThe Dodgers don't need any patches. They need to remove the patches off the sleeves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 The only patch the Dodgers need right now is something to patch up the McCourts' failing marriage so they don't have to desperately sell off all their players like the Padres did! :-D ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDwas Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 So...MLB was supposed to release all the new BP style guides today, but apparently that date has been pushed back to November 16. I've been very eager to see what the "big changes" are for 2010, and now I have to wait even longer. Ugh. Tomorrow's just your future yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 So...MLB was supposed to release all the new BP style guides today, but apparently that date has been pushed back to November 16. I've been very eager to see what the "big changes" are for 2010, and now I have to wait even longer. Ugh. No big deal, it's only an extra day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashcarson15 Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 So...MLB was supposed to release all the new BP style guides today, but apparently that date has been pushed back to November 16. I've been very eager to see what the "big changes" are for 2010, and now I have to wait even longer. Ugh. No big deal, it's only an extra day...No you've still got 2 and a half months of suffering through watching the Bucs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdAstraKC Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Hey guysThis is my first post at CCSLC. I'm happy to have found a community that shares my interest in sports uni's and logos.I made a couple graphics of the new powder blue Royals hat. I know these are sort of concepts but I think they are appropriate in this thread.Anyways, I look forward to C+C and to hear what you guys think about next year's changes. I look forward to talking sports logos and uni's with you all.Here's what I would hope the Royals new hat would look likeHere's what I think the Royals hat will actually look like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Found this logo in the sponsor section of the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Magazine. The twins ball logo surrounded by text. Good looking update to the logo overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swilson160 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Found this logo in the sponsor section of the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Magazine. The twins ball logo surrounded by text. Good looking update to the logo overall.Nice find. If legit, this is better than the current primary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDwas Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 That second Royals hat and the Twins logo are both legitimate and accurate. Good work, gang.(Post #900 btw...woot) Tomorrow's just your future yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swilson160 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Here's what I think the Royals hat will actually look likeThat second Royals hat and the Twins logo are both legitimate and accurate. Good work, gang.That's a hell of a first post, Charlie. Welcome and nice job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Not sure if I like the new Twins logo. I'm glad Minnesota is included, but I never liked those "Baseball Club" logos. Maybe part of this is because the Padres' take on it used radial Times New Roman italic. Guuuhhh. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian E Posted October 19, 2009 Author Share Posted October 19, 2009 Not sure if I like the new Twins logo. I'm glad Minnesota is included, but I never liked those "Baseball Club" logos. Maybe part of this is because the Padres' take on it used radial Times New Roman italic. Guuuhhh.That's funny you say about the old Padres 'baseball club' usage. My dad and I always used to mock the inclusion of baseball club in their logo when I was younger (a lot of lame jokes like, "Oh, it's not the San Diego Padres Stamp Collectors?") and I think because of that, I always enjoy 'baseball club' logos. Makes me nostalgic. Overall though, we can say that Minnesota looks like it's on it's way to a perfect update: nothing drastic, nothing disgustingly ugly and modern, but nice simple touches that make the logos and unis feel more 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Found this logo in the sponsor section of the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Magazine. The twins ball logo surrounded by text. Good looking update to the logo overall.Nice find. If legit, this is better than the current primary.I'll confirm it that it's legit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Found this logo in the sponsor section of the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Magazine. The twins ball logo surrounded by text. Good looking update to the logo overall.Nice find. If legit, this is better than the current primary.I'll confirm it that it's legit.Now that we have an image, can you tell us anything about the color(s) of the ball and the script drop shadow? Is there anything other than white going on there? Creamy shading as on the ball in the Giants logo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayJaxon Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 That Twins logo doesn't look bad at all. I like the light blue Royals hat too. So far so good on the changes. I'm eager to find out which team completely screws it up this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Found this logo in the sponsor section of the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Magazine. The twins ball logo surrounded by text. Good looking update to the logo overall.Nice find. If legit, this is better than the current primary.I'll confirm it that it's legit.Now that we have an image, can you tell us anything about the color(s) of the ball and the script drop shadow? Is there anything other than white going on there? Creamy shading as on the ball in the Giants logo?I shouldn't say too much, but that yellow-ish stuff in there is probably the by-product of poor reproduction. There isn't any Yellow or Cream in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Found this logo in the sponsor section of the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Magazine. The twins ball logo surrounded by text. Good looking update to the logo overall.Nice find. If legit, this is better than the current primary.I'll confirm it that it's legit.Now that we have an image, can you tell us anything about the color(s) of the ball and the script drop shadow? Is there anything other than white going on there? Creamy shading as on the ball in the Giants logo?I shouldn't say too much, but that yellow-ish stuff in there is probably the by-product of poor reproduction. There isn't any Yellow or Cream in there.I agree with Color Werx, the image was tiny in the magazine and my scan is not the greatest. The logo in the magazine shows a white ball and not a cream or yellow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BallWonk Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 So far so good on the changes. I'm eager to find out which team completely screws it up this year I'll take Mets for twelve hundred, Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian E Posted October 19, 2009 Author Share Posted October 19, 2009 So far so good on the changes. I'm eager to find out which team completely screws it up this year I'll take Mets for twelve hundred, Alex. ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.