srj34 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 This is close to what I wanted to find; the only difference is that the numbers were NOT offset when they debuted. The first batch the team recieved had the usual size and justification, not the throwback-ish offset small they were supposed to have. The mistake version looked much better than the correct version.But I agree with the earlier post: alts should look better than the primaries and used more sparingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 These are one of my favorite NFL throwback uni's .... They'd never go back to them as primary which I can understand, but they wear white with those silver-blue-green pant monstrosities virtually ever home & away game that I'd like to see them wear these early 60s throwbacks twice a season rather than once, as they've been limiting them to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Can't believe these weren't mentioned.Agreed .... but did you really have to ruin it by using a photo with JP Losman wearing it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorGangorDie Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 But using the picture of the guy who blamed God for him dropping the touchdown pass is any better? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 But using the picture of the guy who blamed God for him dropping the touchdown pass is any better? lolHey, I respected Johnson a lot for that.If that credit hog in the sky keeps taking props for wins, he has to take his blame for the losses. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YessSir32 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 These are one of my favorite NFL throwback uni's .... They'd never go back to them as primary which I can understand, but they wear white with those silver-blue-green pant monstrosities virtually ever home & away game that I'd like to see them wear these early 60s throwbacks twice a season rather than once, as they've been limiting them to.I love these, really nice look for them although I not a fan of them. Detroit Falcons (NABL) | Detroit Gears (UFL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldRamsFan Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 eh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopCat Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 All Minnesota teams' alternates are superior to their primary home uniforms. Twins - '61 throwbacksVikings - throwbacksWild - green and wheat 3rd jerseyWolves - black alternate, both now and during the KG era facebook | @thebugcollector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrodsep Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnclearInitial Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 That's a Photoshop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrodsep Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 That's a Photoshop.Don't know if THAT particular picture is photoshoped but according to CCSL archives they wore that combo in 2003. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 That's a Photoshop.No it isn't. That pic is 100% real. I remember seeing the exact same pic from the Cleveland Plain Dealer. For some reason, their orange pants were an off-color. Maybe it was the material, I dunno. They need to bring back the orange pants for their brown jersey. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Boy Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 That's a Photoshop.So are most of the pictures in Playboy, but that doesn't make them any less fun to look at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmd9 Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 That's a Photoshop.No it isn't. That pic is 100% real. I remember seeing the exact same pic from the Cleveland Plain Dealer. For some reason, their orange pants were an off-color. Maybe it was the material, I dunno. They need to bring back the orange pants for their brown jersey.They wore that combo twice. Against the Rams on Monday night (most likely where this pic is from) and once against the Steelers in Cleveland.I think most Browns fans would agree that the orange pants NEED to make a comeback... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 That's a Photoshop.No it isn't. That pic is 100% real. I remember seeing the exact same pic from the Cleveland Plain Dealer. For some reason, their orange pants were an off-color. Maybe it was the material, I dunno. They need to bring back the orange pants for their brown jersey.Those are so sexy. And I don't think its a photoshop, looks like this is a pic from the same game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Can't believe these weren't mentioned.They weren't mentioned because they're hideous. The Eagles look disgusting in black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted March 30, 2011 Share Posted March 30, 2011 Can't believe these weren't mentioned.They weren't mentioned because they're hideous. The Eagles look disgusting in black.Ahem to that. The black Eagles jersey is one of the all-time worst NFL jerseys. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.