Jump to content

Really?! CIFL team using XFL logo


OchentaYOcho88

Recommended Posts

A pro indoor football team out of Evansville, Indiana is straight up using a recolor of the old Orlando Rage logo from the XFL http://www.evansvillerage.com/

I am on the coaching staff of an pro indoor team (different league) and we strive to be professional to try and relieve the stigma of Indoor ball being a joke... but when there are organizations recoloring logos, not paying players and ripping off their venues... it's really hard. This just REALLY frustrates me.

Thoughts?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A pro indoor football team out of Evansville, Indiana is straight up using a recolor of the old Orlando Rage logo from the XFL http://www.evansvillerage.com/

I am on the coaching staff of an pro indoor team (different league) and we strive to be professional to try and relieve the stigma of Indoor ball being a joke... but when there are organizations recoloring logos, not paying players and ripping off their venues... it's really hard. This just REALLY frustrates me.

Thoughts?

Are those seriously their uniforms on the front page?

b0b5d4f702adf623d75285ca50ee7632.jpg
Why you make fun of me? I make concept for Auburn champions and you make fun of me. I cry tears.
Chopping off the dicks of Filipino boys and embracing causes that promote bigotry =/= strong moral character.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Vince McMahon/WWE still owns the rights to the team logos? I'm sure he/they do.

A pro indoor football team out of Evansville, Indiana is straight up using a recolor of the old Orlando Rage logo from the XFL http://www.evansvillerage.com/

I am on the coaching staff of an pro indoor team (different league) and we strive to be professional to try and relieve the stigma of Indoor ball being a joke... but when there are organizations recoloring logos, not paying players and ripping off their venues... it's really hard. This just REALLY frustrates me.

Thoughts?

Are those seriously their uniforms on the front page?

I doubt it, they've yet to play a game.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premium Indoor Football Team.

Somebody tell me what that's supposed to mean.

I think the fact that they not only chose to steal an XFL identity, but stole the worst XFL identity, tells you pretty much all you need to know about this operation.

On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said:

For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA.

PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premium Indoor Football Team.

Somebody tell me what that's supposed to mean.

I think the fact that they not only chose to steal an XFL identity, but stole the worst XFL identity, tells you pretty much all you need to know about this operation.

Well that....and the fact that it is Evansville we are talking about here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overused Lombardi quote, check. Random stock photo with a logo poorly shopped on, check. Stolen logo, check.

Yeah, seems like a real winner. I too would like to know what a "Premium" football team is. As opposed to... Diet? Regular? Standard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Vince McMahon/WWE still owns the rights to the team logos? I'm sure he/they do.

They don't. Haven't since like 2002 or 2003. No one owns them currently so technically, they aren't doing anything wrong. But could they and should they be more original? Yes. They could and should.

Quote

If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Vince McMahon/WWE still owns the rights to the team logos? I'm sure he/they do.

They don't. Haven't since like 2002 or 2003. No one owns them currently so technically, they aren't doing anything wrong. But could they and should they be more original? Yes. They could and should.

Why wouldn't he or WWE or NBC still own the rights?

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Vince McMahon/WWE still owns the rights to the team logos? I'm sure he/they do.

They don't. Haven't since like 2002 or 2003. No one owns them currently so technically, they aren't doing anything wrong. But could they and should they be more original? Yes. They could and should.

Exactly, Chawls!

Concentrate more on your "coaching" and less on what logos people use legally and you may be better off for it 'OchentaYOcho88'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Vince McMahon/WWE still owns the rights to the team logos? I'm sure he/they do.

They don't. Haven't since like 2002 or 2003. No one owns them currently so technically, they aren't doing anything wrong. But could they and should they be more original? Yes. They could and should.

Exactly, Chawls!

Concentrate more on your "coaching" and less on what logos people use legally and you may be better off for it 'OchentaYOcho88'.

This has nothing to do with my coaching. But this does have everything to do with the stigma that follows indoor football and it's unprofessionalism and last I checked this is a sports aesthetics board and I was just sharing something I found. I'm sure you would be upset if I were to tell you to concentrate on your own profession and not worry about what uniforms/logos teams are wearing.

I like many on this board thing that using someone else's intellectual property is wrong even if the rights are not owned by someone. I don't think it's right for a high school to use another team's logos and I sure as hell think that it is wrong for a professional organization to do so.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Vince McMahon/WWE still owns the rights to the team logos? I'm sure he/they do.

They don't. Haven't since like 2002 or 2003. No one owns them currently so technically, they aren't doing anything wrong. But could they and should they be more original? Yes. They could and should.

Why wouldn't he or WWE or NBC still own the rights?

I don't know much. I just know that when the rights expired on the ownership of the logos, Vince/WWE didn't renew them. I've actually considered buying the San Francisco Demons logo, if only I knew the price.

5255.gif

Quote

If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.