CS85 Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 I wonder how many 2-goal leads the Blackhawks have blown this series. Gotta be a record of some kind. It's great having a 2-0 start to the game but there's fewer playoff teams who go to sleep after a 2-0 lead quicker than the Blackhawks. Seabrook penalty, Oduya screws up his defensive assignment, and zero SOG since 2nd goal. Yeah, that's not how you win a game 7. edit: and there it goesedit 2: nevermind Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 I think the Kings have been carrying the play so far.And just as I type this, Mr. Game Seven ties it up.Scratch that....Blackhawks score.The wind must be blowing out at Wrigley this evening..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Hey LA, you tied it up! Good on ya....oh wait... PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new? I'd be putting in Jones at this point, as there's no way he could do any worse, but Sutter is too stubborn to do it. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new?That last one wasn't his fault. That was one weird bounce. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zpqmaowl Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 No goal... the worst helmets design to me is the Jacksonville jaguars hamlets from 1995 to 2012 because you can't see the logo vary wall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramerica Industries Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new?That last one wasn't his fault. That was one weird bounce.You know, I wonder if there was a slight deflection off Doughty's stick, too. That was one seriously wonky bounce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new?That last one wasn't his fault. That was one weird bounce.True, but letting in 12 goals in the last three games is absolutely his fault, though. At some point, you just need to steal a game and make saves when it counts.I really don't understand it. Quick looks like the best goalie in hockey against any other team, but Chicago's in his head rent-free for some reason. I still would give Jones a chance - what's there to lose at this point? The worst-case scenario is that he's a sieve too and nothing changes. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagel Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 No goal...It was close. That camera angle isn't level with the crossbar so it's a bit deceiving. Could have been called either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmic Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 No analysis from Oddball for the first five minutes? I don't want to have to wait to know how the game will end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramerica Industries Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new?That last one wasn't his fault. That was one weird bounce.True, but letting in 12 goals in the last three games is absolutely his fault, though. At some point, you just need to steal a game and make saves when it counts.I really don't understand it. Quick looks like the best goalie in hockey against any other team, but Chicago's in his head rent-free for some reason. I still would give Jones a chance - what's there to lose at this point? The worst-case scenario is that he's a sieve too and nothing changes.This is not a case of Chicago being in his head. Jonathan Quick was getting lit up by San Jose too until he stopped getting lit up by San Jose. Contrary to popular belief, he's not one of the very best goaltenders in the league; he's one of the streakiest and this can come and go at any time. Martin Jones and Ben Scrivens also posted really good numbers with Los Angeles, so that should give some idea that Quick benefits from LA's steadfast puck possession construct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unocal Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 THIS IS MADNESS! AND SPARTA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 This is not a case of Chicago being in his head. Jonathan Quick was getting lit up by San Jose too until he stopped getting lit up by San Jose.The entire team :censored: the bed early in the Sharks series this year, though. Last year against San Jose, Quick was playing out of his mind at times. It really has just been Chicago that makes him look this bad. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still MIGHTY Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new?That last one wasn't his fault. That was one weird bounce.True, but letting in 12 goals in the last three games is absolutely his fault, though. At some point, you just need to steal a game and make saves when it counts.I really don't understand it. Quick looks like the best goalie in hockey against any other team, but Chicago's in his head rent-free for some reason. I still would give Jones a chance - what's there to lose at this point? The worst-case scenario is that he's a sieve too and nothing changes.What's there to lose? Seriously?It's a one goal game after one period. This isn't like it was for Anaheim in their Game 7. It's not 3-0 or 4-0 and saying what's there to lose. If you overreact and throw Martin Jones in and he lets in two quick goals and it's a three-goal lead, then you're in far deeper than you are now. Then it's lost. And is Darryl Sutter ever one to overreact? If anything, he under reacts, severely.And maybe Chicago makes Quick look "bad" because the Blackhawks, just maybe, might be good. But what do I know? I don't watch hockey.You need some more seasoning if you want to commit to this hockey thing. | ANA | LAA | LAR | LAL | ASU | CSULB | USMNT | USWNT | LAFC | OCSC | MAN UTD | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Quick choking against Chicago yet again, what else is new?That last one wasn't his fault. That was one weird bounce.True, but letting in 12 goals in the last three games is absolutely his fault, though. At some point, you just need to steal a game and make saves when it counts.I really don't understand it. Quick looks like the best goalie in hockey against any other team, but Chicago's in his head rent-free for some reason. I still would give Jones a chance - what's there to lose at this point? The worst-case scenario is that he's a sieve too and nothing changes.What's there to lose? Seriously?It's a one goal game after one period. This isn't like it was for Anaheim in their Game 7. It's not 3-0 or 4-0 and saying what's there to lose. If you overreact and throw Martin Jones in and he lets in two quick goals and it's a three-goal lead, then you're in far deeper than you are now. Then it's lost. And is Darryl Sutter ever one to overreact? If anything, he under reacts, severely.And maybe Chicago makes Quick look "bad" because the Blackhawks, just maybe, might be good. But what do I know? I don't watch hockey.You need some more seasoning if you want to commit to this hockey thing.Lights Off was more tolerable when he was solely fellating LeBron and Chris Peterson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramerica Industries Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 The closest I've ever seen Darryl Sutter get to "overreacting" was pulling Quick after the 1st period of Game 4 in the last round with Anaheim up 2-0.But, yes, you ride Jonathan Quick for what he's worth in a one-goal game in Game 7. There's no logically arguing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HedleyLamarr Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Game's tied. Pull Quick!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Nice assist by Handzus there BEAR DOWN ARIZONA!2013/14 Tanks Picks Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramerica Industries Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 Given how Chicago scored their PPG, that's a pretty well deserved break there, Handzus' shot block going right to the unmarked Tyler Toffoli. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still MIGHTY Posted June 2, 2014 Share Posted June 2, 2014 OH NOEZ. KINGZ IN CRAWFERD'S HEAD! PULL HEM! | ANA | LAA | LAR | LAL | ASU | CSULB | USMNT | USWNT | LAFC | OCSC | MAN UTD | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.