Jump to content

29texan

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,921

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 29texan

  1. 29texan
    I would say: - show the separation of feet from the legs like the old logo - have that line on the right side of the frog's leg run up a little more to show more separation of the leg and body - the tail and left back leg still look connected, so show a line there, too - I like the gray shadow And you don't have to, but I'd like to see a little red under the eye. (I'm the TCU fan here, so of course I'll have more thoughts on it than everyone else. But this is an improvement.)
  2. 29texan
    I don't know about the logo... seems incomplete, now. I would like a more streamlined frog, but that just makes it look too jagged. Everything else is fine, though.
  3. 29texan
  4. 29texan
    And so it shall be (thank god) . . .
  5. 29texan
    Well... so much for this...
  6. 29texan
    It's not my team, so I'm not nearly as emotionally attached... but the fact that "RedWolves" isn't even a possibility now ruins the anticipation for me. It's either Admirals or Commandos.
  7. 29texan
    You sure?
  8. 29texan
    Oh trust me... no I didn't. We all get that the name isn't great and hell, even I wanted them to go with "Fort Worth" despite the fact that I'm glad they used the Panther City moniker, but these subtle, smug (and slightly ignorant) comments get on my nerves. You could ask why the team is named that, maybe learn something about a city that's new to this sport and pretty much never gets any attention outside of TCU, but nah, let's all just crap on it and throw out stereotypes.
  9. 29texan
    I just got off a 30 day ban on facebook... I'm not going to start with you people here.
  10. 29texan
    PCLC turf reveal.
  11. 29texan
  12. 29texan
    The one and only problem I have with this is the Stockyards Coliseum motif, and it's the only problem I've had with this identity since it was revealed... well, other than not going with "Fort Worth". People will see it and think San Antonio, not Fort Worth.
  13. 29texan
    The NCAA is as good as dead... at least on the football side of things, anyway. There still needs to be some kind of collective bargaining agreement since we're pretty much acknowledging that this isn't "armature sports" as it should have been a long time ago.
  14. 29texan
    But that's mostly already happening... only three schools since this playoffs started (Bama, Clemson, Ohio State) have been pretty much guarantees to make it in. That's really not my point, though. FBS and an FCS are both Division 1 with their own individual playoffs. I don't see what it would hurt if there's a sub-division in between, like with my C-USA examples, that has its own separate national championship.
  15. 29texan
    My only response to that is: We have FBS and FCS in football, but not in basketball or other sports... so what difference would it make if we added a sub-division to the sub-division?
  16. 29texan
    Don't assume. I only did this because, if we're being honest, even in my fantasy mock up of these conferences and playoffs, they'll still find a way to keep these smaller schools out of the playoffs. Even now, I believe there should just be separate playoffs for the Power Five Four and Group of "Five". I'm just going with what's being presented right now. Personally, I'd prefer an 8 team playoff, 16 max... but just the talks of that are currently on hold because of UT and OU.
  17. 29texan
    My fantasy set-up for College Conferences ------------------------------------------------------------- Five 16 team "Super Conferences" ======================== - "ACC" (ACC + Notre Dame & WVU) - "American XVI" (Best 15 of the Go5 teams + one Big XII member) - "B1G" (Big Sixteen; Big Ten + Two Big XII members) - "Pac-16" (Pac-12 + 4 Big XII members) - "SEC" (SEC + Texas and OU) These 5 conferences play for the 12-team College Football Playoff with bowls. ______________________________________________________________________ Conference USA =========================================== - Atlantic (12 teams) 8 C-USA members + 3 independents + 1 FCS call-up - Central (14 teams) 10 MAC members + 2 C-USA members + 2 FCS call-ups - Mountain (16 teams) 9 Mt. West members + 4 FCS Call-ups + 2 C-USA members +1 Independent - South (16 teams) 8 Sun Belt members + 7 C-USA members + 1 FCS call-up This would basically be four different conferences falling under one brand and having its own separate 4-team playoff.
  18. 29texan
    I live down the street, I am a TCU supporter... can't tell you how many times I've been saying this to people. TCU and Fort Worth fits in with "Pac 12 culture" A LOT MORE than people think it would . . .
  19. 29texan
    I still say Portland.
  20. 29texan
  21. 29texan
    My thoughts on a 32 team NBA - 4 Divisions instead of 2 conferences - All expansion and relocations based on current rumors... except Seattle, because I'm pretty sure we can all agree that's set in stone. - Revamped Playoff Format explained below:
  22. 29texan
    I'm not critiquing, I'm just going to say as Rangers fan and a Texan in general... that just doesn't look right without the Red White and Blue.
  23. 29texan
    *Arlington... which is actually a suburb of Fort Worth... But I know what you're saying. San Antonio is also "Rangers Territory" as much as it is Cowboys Territory
  24. 29texan
    While I won't say these other Bowl games are "pointless", I WILL say that it's funny seeing how they'll add more Bowls but having an 8 team playoff in a league of over 130 teams for the actual National Championship is too much and "diminishes the regular season"...
  25. 29texan
    We have more than one nickname...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept