Los Angeles Jaguars-First Alternate Logo pg 5

[St Louis Cardinals]

OPTION 2 is so much better

[Lee Noire]

Colors still hurt this for me. I guess I'm just over teal in sports. That being said I'd go with A. It could be top 5 in the league if it were real. The neck area needs to be kept to set it apart from other "head" logos(specifically the Pats) and I just love the "now even more subtle" L.A. down there(I think I still see it).

[Hontas]

Tough choice, but I go with option 1.

And, yes, they do resemble the Pats logo.

[hugevolsfan]

I disagree I like option B has nice feel & would look much better on a helmet.

I do not think it looks like the Patriots that much but does have a similar style.

[mcrosby]

How does everyone feel about this color combination: (let me know if it's too bright, my computer screen only works on its dimmest setting so I'm doing a bit of guess work)

[wILL-INI]

Not sure how the old fan base (all 50 of them) would like you taking their old logo, killing it, skinning it, and putting it on our head. haha

But that aside this is a really great concept. I really like it. I think option 2 is a little simpler and I like the overall shape of the logo better. The biggest bother to me is check spot.

[mcrosby]

Not sure how the old fan base would like you taking their old logo, killing it, skinning it, and putting it on our head. haha

It's a ceremonial thing. All relocations should have something like this.

Imagine if the Ravens logo was of a raven picking apart a bulldog...

[Lee Noire]

The last skin tone was better. It wasn't the problem for me it was the teal. I think red & green feathers would look great. It would be more colorful and bright like the Aztec attire is often depicted to be. So you had the right idea to brighten it up but I would've left the face alone. This version is definitely the best of the 2 still. I can't help but see the pats in the other

[Buster]

I would go with Option A as well, Option B is giving me a little too much of a Flying Elvis vibe.

Also, I would consider changing the name to Aztecs, as I think it still represent a new start in LA while still tying in to the old team.

Both are way too close to the patriots logo.

Yeah, I thought the first design was a joke because of the Elvis face.

[nuordr]

I like what you are going for even though it still looks like the Patriots logo, but the real issue would be that this would never fly because someone who claim it as offensive.

[wildwing64]

I can see where the Flying Elvis comparisons are coming in, and I think it's down to the bloke's facial expression. They are very similar, even if that wasn't intentional. Maybe you just need something to really set this apart from the Pats, like give him an eye or something.

Other than that I really don't have anything to add. Everything about this works so well together, love the hidden LA on the neck. This would definitely be among the best logos in the NFL if it was used in real life. Absolutely brilliant.

[pianoknight]

This has potential, however you must swap the colors, IMO. I get the Aztec-inspired headdress that you're shooting for here, but with the Jacksonville colors, it just looks like the Jag is barfing out a dude's head.

I like your new color palette and you could actually include teal as an accent, but I would avoid it as the primary. Also, I would consider making it look more like a "hat" and perhaps include some side-face detail of the man. Like an earring, some feathers, sideburns, etc.

[CAB]

I think option 2 is vastly superior. It just flows better and would work so much better on a helmet. Yeah, there's definitely a resemblance to the Patriots' logo, but it's just a concept. If you were to legitimately pitch it to the team, you'd have to change it. I also prefer the original color scheme to the new one you posted, but I think if you make uniforms you should include gold more prominently than they did in Jacksonville.

[mcrosby]

[Whittier S]

Fantastic concept, but dmhtfld is right, insofar as the face of the man is much too similar. I'd play with the aesthetic you're using to portray the facial features. And #1 is better than 2 because it is further removed (but not far enough) from the Patriots logo.

[Whittier S]

[redacted, wasn't paying attention.]

The name Aztecs wouldn't fly in real life for a professional team today. I think Jaguars works.

[Philsphan]

This last logo is phemononal. It gets rid of the Elvisy thing and the feathers look great. Great job taking a concept, listening to advice and then making it 100x better. Also, LA Aztecs sounds a lot better than LA Jags!

[hugevolsfan]

I like the update alot but I still am not a fan of the neck I feel it hurts the flow of the logo.

I see what you were doing with the hidden LA but of course it would not work on the other side of the helmet.

Maybe if you shortened the back side of the neck to flow with the feathers this would be perfect IMO but great job no matter what!

[henburg]

This update is perfect, exactly what I wanted you to do. The new color set look great, and the new name is more fitting for the logo. Well done, sir.

[Raymie]

This is where it should be in terms of design — but there should be some teal somewhere. I strongly feel like teal needs to remain as a nod to the past. I understand why people don't like it, but I think teal instead of red would look more distinct.