Jump to content

Recommended Posts

       Y'all. Barbara Lee is threatening MLB's anti-trust exception over the A's to Vegas move. Rob Manfred might actually destroy this league   "As a federal legislator, I believe such actions are inconsistent with federal policy goals related to the MLB's exemption from antitrust scrutiny."      

 

I'm not a lawyer, but I've studied the legal and political side of sports in undergrad. The league is :censored:ed if Brett Kavanaugh's decision on college athletics is anything to go by. More than 100 years of precedent thrown away for greed. Like, calling them icarus would almost be too on the nose

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yawn.  Threatening the antitrust exemption is nothing more than political grandstanding.  It's been done a hundred times.  

  • Like 2

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GhostOfNormMacdonald said:

       Y'all. Barbara Lee is threatening MLB's anti-trust exception over the A's to Vegas move. Rob Manfred might actually destroy this league   "As a federal legislator, I believe such actions are inconsistent with federal policy goals related to the MLB's exemption from antitrust scrutiny."      

 

I'm not a lawyer, but I've studied the legal and political side of sports in undergrad. The league is :censored:ed if Brett Kavanaugh's decision on college athletics is anything to go by. More than 100 years of precedent thrown away for greed. Like, calling them icarus would almost be too on the nose

There's as much chance of Barbara Lee getting MLB's anti-trust exemption taken away as I do of winning the run for US President I'm not now, nor ever will make.  She doesn't have the pull, the ability, or the votes to get that done.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GDAWG said:

Watching the special session of the Nevada Legislature and I realized one thing:

 

- I think one of the dude's name is Jeremy Aguero?  He needs to say it at least 100 more times for me to know for sure.

 

Watching this special session reminds me of how insane certain aspects of our democracy can be. These people are praying and doing the pledge of allegiance, and reading inane :censored: that everyone is already aware of at 11:45pm simply to take a few votes.  Nevermind the brain dead fools on the public comment period preceding it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GDAWG said:

Watching the special session of the Nevada Legislature and I realized one thing:

 

- I think one of the dude's name is Jeremy Aguero?  He needs to say it at least 100 more times for me to know for sure.

I went to school with a guy with that name when I was a kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even the special session for a simple "Yes or no" on the A's to Las Vegas has been a bit of a mess.

 

- They were supposed to vote on Wednesday, but didn't because it went long and wanted voting to resume the next day.  On Thursday, the session was in recess because apparently, amendments were to be added to the bill that would approve the A's ballpark in Las Vegas and they recessed for the rest of the weekend, supposedly going to resume today at 11AM Pacific/1 Central/2 Eastern, but as of now that hasn't happened.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lest we forget, tomorrow night (June 13) is the night of the "Reverse Boycott" game, which has been targeted by a group of A's fans as a time to (a) form one of the largest crowds for any A's home game in the team's history in Oakland, (b) demonstrate that the A's still have a large and passionate fanbase in and around Oakland, and (c) pressure John Fisher and his partners to sell the A's to a person or group who will keep the team in Oakland, get a deal done with Oakland's political establishment for a new ballpark, and spend much more money on the team than what Fisher, Dave Kaval, and their associates have been willing and/or able to spend.

 

Tomorrow is also the first day of a three-day series of meetings among MLB team owners in New York City.  Obviously, the organizers of this "Reverse Boycott" are hoping that the A's home game on that night will have a crowd that is both big enough and loud enough to persuade as many MLB teams' ownerships as possible to (a) call for Fisher and his group to sell the A's as soon as possible and (b) insist that whoever owns the A's keep that franchise in Oakland for as long as possible.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vegas' MLB team should create their own identity, instead of recycling Oakland's former teams.

 

I get that the football team has been in the league for a long time. But to be completely honest, I'm not a big fan of how Las Vegas Raiders sounds as a new Vegas brand identity. If it was my team, I would want a proper identity fitting with Montreal, instead of taking another franchise and swapping city names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, habsfan1 said:

Vegas' MLB team should create their own identity, instead of recycling Oakland's former teams.

 

I get that the football team has been in the league for a long time. But to be completely honest, I'm not a big fan of how Las Vegas Raiders sounds as a new Vegas brand identity. If it was my team, I would want a proper identity fitting with Montreal, instead of taking another franchise and swapping city names.

Philadelphia Athletics. Kansas City Athletics. Oakland Athletics. Las Vegas Athletics.

Oakland Raiders. Los Angeles Raiders. Oakland Raiders. Las Vegas Raiders.

 

Yes. Oakland's identities.

  • Like 4
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Sykotyk said:

Philadelphia Athletics. Kansas City Athletics. Oakland Athletics. Las Vegas Athletics.

Oakland Raiders. Los Angeles Raiders. Oakland Raiders. Las Vegas Raiders.

 

Yes. Oakland's identities.

 

The Raiders were originally from Oakland. It still feels like Oakland's team, even if they had brief stint in LA.

 

The Athletics came from Philly. The name by chance fit Oakland to a degree because it worked for a classic team from the 60s. I thought Vegas would be more creative, seeing how the Golden Knights set the bar, in terms of team branding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Athletics brand has been around for 122 years. The Raiders for 63 years. Neither brand is going away no matter what city or cities they've relocated to. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, habsfan1 said:

Vegas' MLB team should create their own identity, instead of recycling Oakland's former teams.

 

I get that the football team has been in the league for a long time. But to be completely honest, I'm not a big fan of how Las Vegas Raiders sounds as a new Vegas brand identity. If it was my team, I would want a proper identity fitting with Montreal, instead of taking another franchise and swapping city names.

 

Neither are “Oakland’s identities”. A’s in particular have been around 123 years in 3 cities.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2023 at 5:05 PM, GhostOfNormMacdonald said:

       Y'all. Barbara Lee is threatening MLB's anti-trust exception over the A's to Vegas move. Rob Manfred might actually destroy this league   "As a federal legislator, I believe such actions are inconsistent with federal policy goals related to the MLB's exemption from antitrust scrutiny."      

 

I'm not a lawyer, but I've studied the legal and political side of sports in undergrad. The league is :censored:ed if Brett Kavanaugh's decision on college athletics is anything to go by. More than 100 years of precedent thrown away for greed. Like, calling them icarus would almost be too on the nose


Barbara Lee is simply using the A’s relocation to pander for votes for her senate run, Meanwhile Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao is out here cutting photops at the Reverse Boycott to show she cares when in reality she hasn’t don’t anything since she was elected. Atleast former mayor Libby Schaaf went to the negotiation table with the A’s. All Sheng did was claim she was “blindsided” by the Las Vegas move when the A’s have been in negotiations with Las Vegas for the last 2 years. Hello, they’ve been making routine site scouting trips out there! The sad part is judging by the replies on Twitter, there’s a lot of suckers buying into these politicians acts.

 

It didn’t have to be this way at all. Everyone knows the Coliseum is a dump and something needed to be done for years. The A’s have been seeking a new ballpark in Oakland as far back as 2002 (Uptown site), years before John Fisher & Lew Wolff bought the club. The city could’ve worked to a deal with the A’s together, especially at the Laney College/Peralta site which was more financially realistic for both sides. Howard Terminal was a last resort pipe dream because the City of Oakland allowed port businesses (namely Schnitzer Steel) to pollute the area, thus now requiring sky high remediation costs in order to build on top of addressing infrastructure & site access issues. Howard Terminal was never gonna work. But it also was never gonna happen if fans can do more and better organize efforts then their own failed city leadership. Like it or not, Vegas did in 2 years what Oakland couldn’t do in 20 years: A deal for an adequate home ballpark finally. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Applause 1
  • Dislike 1
NYCdog.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, :censored: the SF Giants. Their territorial rights claim on San Jose is literally robbing sports fans throughout the entire Bay Area (Oakland included) from having a second baseball team in the region. That’s why we’re here today, with A’s moving to Vegas.  Otherwise the A’s would’ve been in SJ a decade ago. Now the Giants have the entire region to themselves and they’ll probably fight off any hopes for replacement expansion franchise in Oakland. 

  • Like 1
  • Dislike 1
NYCdog.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.