dennisbergan Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Sorry, but those are horrible. The old things were worse, but these suck too.I guess the Buffalo franchise with their 140 year old owner, can't figure out a good looking uniform.Those striped socks are AWFUL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennisbergan Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Still an upgrade, though.They would wear pink and polka dots, and it would be an upgrade over those things they have been wearing.But these new things are a dull, cluttered mess. Just like their franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennisbergan Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 What is this, 1973?Ralph Wilson thinks so.The Bills, Chiefs and Redskins all think their 1970's-ish uniforms are dope and fly. There is a reason nobody dresses like that in any form of football in this country anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezus_Ghoti Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 What is this, 1973?Ralph Wilson thinks so.The Bills, Chiefs and Redskins all think their 1970's-ish uniforms are dope and fly. There is a reason nobody dresses like that in any form of football in this country anymore.Um... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 From what I can see on my phone, they look beautiful. Not sure about the helmet stripe, will have to see how it looks in action. But the Bills might have jumped to the top half-dozen in the NFL. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abluecarrot Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 If you read closely they're made of that horrible super stretchy fabric the Giants, Jaguars, and some Colts wear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Horrible. Simply horrible. They took 18 months to come up with a grey (in my view ugly) facemask, two thin stripes and the old logo? What is this, 1973?Needs:Blue facemaskWider stripesWrap-around charging buffalo (similar to the wrap-around Seahawks jersey of the 80's)blue pantsJeeze, how about some innovation for once?Because all we do is compain when sportswear companies try to innovate. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 If you read closely they're made of that horrible super stretchy fabric the Giants, Jaguars, and some Colts wear. Super stretchy gahhhhhhhhhhhhhhasdjfadsabgjetugbergfarufarpuadiuofba;skldjf'AOEWISADJFAKLJDFALFAUDSFAR:censored:.Oh my God. Â Â https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONUV Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Okay, take a deep look at this photo ... it sure appears to me that Steve Tasker 89, Booker Edgerson 24, and Jim Kelly 12 ... are wearing REPLICA jerseys.All the others in # 11 are wearing AUTHENTIC jerseys.Look how the numbers are a bit smaller in the front on all the 11's which are authentics, yet they have a fatter navy blue outline on the replica jerseys.When REEBOK makes replica jerseys, the jersey numbers are the same size on both the front and back, but authentic ones that the players wear, the front jersey numbers are always somewhat smaller than the jersey numbers on the back.As Johnny pointed out, there are blue pants in the new set which surprised me when they didn't appear today.One tweak I can see is an easy no-brainer, and that is that the sleeve stripes need to be lowered, and in doing so the 'Reebok' logo should be moved above the sleeve stripes. An easy reversal.Only in 1964 I believe it was, were the stripes that far up ... like the COLTS have. I don't care for that 1964 look, it needs a reversal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Why the jersey striping doesn't match the helmet and pants striping is beyond me.A. Because matching every set of stripes on the uniform is beyond boring, and B. Because the helmet and pants would look terrible if each one had not one but two 3-color stripes on it. No one in the NFL has helmet or pant striping like that! I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Okay, take a deep look at this photo ... it sure appears to me that Steve Tasker 89, Booker Edgerson 24, and Jim Kelly 12 ... are wearing REPLICA jerseys.All the others in # 11 are wearing AUTHENTIC jerseys.Nope. Tasker, Edgerson, and Kelly are wearing the authentics that are available to purchase.The #11's are the on-field uni's that are not for retail sale. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 So, someone please tell me... are the Sleeve stripes supposed to be diagonal BY DESIGN (kinda like the Chargers' halfway stripes)? Or is it simply a function of the modren jersey cut? Because the Reebok logo appearing below the stripe makes me think it's the former. But I'm not sure.Oh, and for the record... upgrade. Because, really, what wouldn't be? Â http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abluecarrot Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Okay, take a deep look at this photo ... it sure appears to me that Steve Tasker 89, Booker Edgerson 24, and Jim Kelly 12 ... are wearing REPLICA jerseys.All the others in # 11 are wearing AUTHENTIC jerseys.Nope. Tasker, Edgerson, and Kelly are wearing the authentics that are available to purchase.The #11's are the on-field uni's that are not for retail sale.The Giants had that same dilemma where a Manning on field jersey looks like crap and is without that red triangle around the NFL shield and an authentic jersey on sale looks normal and has that triangle but isn't worn on field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 It's because they're the goddamn :censored:ing Super Stretchies. The Giants had that same dilemma where a Manning on field jersey looks like crap and is without that red triangle around the NFL shield and an authentic jersey on sale looks normal and has that triangle but isn't worn on field. Super stretchies adsfjh;ldsjfanh;bgj.Why are you yelling?Please stop. Â http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 So, someone please tell me... are the Sleeve stripes supposed to be diagonal BY DESIGN (kinda like the Chargers' halfway stripes)? Or is it simply a function of the modren jersey cut? Because the Reebok logo appearing below the stripe makes me think it's the former. But I'm not sure.It's a little of both. The retail authentics are more slanted than normal and the on-field uni's are tight-stretched and cause the stripes to be even more slanted. I have a bad feeling all striped teams are going to look like this on the field in 2011 (i.e. Packers, Browns, Steelers, and etc.). JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Okay, take a deep look at this photo ... it sure appears to me that Steve Tasker 89, Booker Edgerson 24, and Jim Kelly 12 ... are wearing REPLICA jerseys.All the others in # 11 are wearing AUTHENTIC jerseys.Nope. Tasker, Edgerson, and Kelly are wearing the authentics that are available to purchase.The #11's are the on-field uni's that are not for retail sale.It's because they're the goddamn :censored:ing Super Stretchies. The Giants had that same dilemma where a Manning on field jersey looks like crap and is without that red triangle around the NFL shield and an authentic jersey on sale looks normal and has that triangle but isn't worn on field. Super stretchies adsfjh;ldsjfanh;bgj.What are you so pissed off about? Jeezus.When REEBOK makes replica jerseys, the jersey numbers are the same size on both the front and backNot true. Numbers on the replicas are different sizes. Front numbers are smaller. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJ Sands Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Why the jersey striping doesn't match the helmet and pants striping is beyond me.A. Because matching every set of stripes on the uniform is beyond boring, and B. Because the helmet and pants would look terrible if each one had not one but two 3-color stripes on it. No one in the NFL has helmet or pant striping like that!You misunderstood. I don't want two three-color stripes on all parts of the uniform. I want the color pattern to be the same. And no, matching every set of stripes isn't boring. It's a clean look that shows organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 The replicas look better. Everyone loves a roundel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mings Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 Nope. I don't like them. Bland and boring. While the last set needed a lot of work to be good, they weren't boring. These have been done before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.