Chawls Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I found some pretty nice Cubs ones:Those are nice, but if anyone should try a pinstripe cap, it's the Yankees. OR Quote If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 It's funny that those Yankees caps use two different versions of the various interlocking NY logos they have. They just need to pick one already.And thanks for the input on the eBay caps, everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I own one of these, had it for about 15 years actually.This would be nice too:I like this one for full time but they've worn it on the field: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michigan Dave Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Brewers:So much classier than the "HEY, WE'RE SPONSORED BY MILLER!!!" caps they wear now.That's because it is a Michigan hat, not a Brewers hat. Hell, even the filename of the photo you posted is "umich-navy-full.jpg". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Wolf Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Oh, what could have beenhttp://www.hatclub.com/sports/2Tone-Marlins-12-Black-Teal-Pink-White-19198 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Oh, what could have beenhttp://www.hatclub.com/sports/2Tone-Marlins-12-Black-Teal-Pink-White-19198Would have been 1000000x better, save for the pink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyAnna Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Brewers:So much classier than the "HEY, WE'RE SPONSORED BY MILLER!!!" caps they wear now.That's because it is a Michigan hat, not a Brewers hat. Hell, even the filename of the photo you posted is "umich-navy-full.jpg".lmao wow The Pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportstar1212 Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Found these:I like the current colors, but this looks cool too.I'd like to see the Angels wear this is an alt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 That'd be a nice road cap, and they could wear a mens' version of this cap at home. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Brewers:So much classier than the "HEY, WE'RE SPONSORED BY MILLER!!!" caps they wear now.That's because it is a Michigan hat, not a Brewers hat. Hell, even the filename of the photo you posted is "umich-navy-full.jpg".It was also posted to someone's blogspot, which is about as reliable as wikipedia. I was born in Michigan, raised in Wisconsin and still visit Michigan on a regular basis and not once have I ever seen a piece of Michigan merch that used metallic gold. Add to it that the fact that New Era is known for mixing and matching MLB teams' logos and colors from different eras, and it's pretty easy to conclude that this is a Brewers hat that got mislabeled.Found these:I like the current colors, but this looks cool too.I came to this thread to post this, but you beat me to it. I've seen stuff like this in the concepts folder before, but I never would've expected it to look so nice in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 It's funny that those Yankees caps use two different versions of the various interlocking NY logos they have. They just need to pick one already.And thanks for the input on the eBay caps, everyone!I think that the Yankees should standardize their NY logos with either the cap or the jersey logo. I've never liked the print (helmet/merchandise) logo, and it would be way too thin for a jersey. The cap logo, however, could work on a jersey, and the jersey logo could work on a cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michigan Dave Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 It was also posted to someone's blogspot, which is about as reliable as wikipedia. I was born in Michigan, raised in Wisconsin and still visit Michigan on a regular basis and not once have I ever seen a piece of Michigan merch that used metallic gold. Add to it that the fact that New Era is known for mixing and matching MLB teams' logos and colors from different eras, and it's pretty easy to conclude that this is a Brewers hat that got mislabeled.I have that hat. In fact, I have it in my hand now. It's the same hat. It has a Michigan "M" on the back, too. There's another 59Fifty Michigan hat with a maize visor that is considerably brighter (almost like the Adidas maize), that has "MICHIGAN" on the back. The hat you posted is the Bo hat. It's the Michigan M, and a Michigan hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSox44 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 It's funny that those Yankees caps use two different versions of the various interlocking NY logos they have. They just need to pick one already.And thanks for the input on the eBay caps, everyone!I think that the Yankees should standardize their NY logos with either the cap or the jersey logo. I've never liked the print (helmet/merchandise) logo, and it would be way too thin for a jersey. The cap logo, however, could work on a jersey, and the jersey logo could work on a cap.While I agree that the print logo should be phased out, I disagree with standardizing the NY across all items. The cap logo should remain on the cap and the jersey logo should remain on the jersey. It's one of those endearing quirks that I love. Not to mention, the jersey NY doesn't really work on the cap and the cap NY doesn't really work on the jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 The biggest thing for me is getting rid of the print logo. If the Yankees just start using either the cap logo or the print logo on the helmets, then that would be a drastic improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njpoz Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Oh, what could have beenhttp://www.hatclub.com/sports/2Tone-Marlins-12-Black-Teal-Pink-White-19198Wow. I don't think the new Marlins designs are that bad, but it's amazing how much better that is than the official cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc51design Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 It's funny that those Yankees caps use two different versions of the various interlocking NY logos they have. They just need to pick one already.And thanks for the input on the eBay caps, everyone!I think that the Yankees should standardize their NY logos with either the cap or the jersey logo. I've never liked the print (helmet/merchandise) logo, and it would be way too thin for a jersey. The cap logo, however, could work on a jersey, and the jersey logo could work on a cap.While I agree that the print logo should be phased out, I disagree with standardizing the NY across all items. The cap logo should remain on the cap and the jersey logo should remain on the jersey. It's one of those endearing quirks that I love. Not to mention, the jersey NY doesn't really work on the cap and the cap NY doesn't really work on the jersey.I reckon the print logo is the only one that should stay, it looks by far the best, it looks designed, not just put together. lockerroom51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 The print logo would never work on a jersey, especially a pinstriped jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 It was also posted to someone's blogspot, which is about as reliable as wikipedia. I was born in Michigan, raised in Wisconsin and still visit Michigan on a regular basis and not once have I ever seen a piece of Michigan merch that used metallic gold. Add to it that the fact that New Era is known for mixing and matching MLB teams' logos and colors from different eras, and it's pretty easy to conclude that this is a Brewers hat that got mislabeled.I have that hat. In fact, I have it in my hand now. It's the same hat. It has a Michigan "M" on the back, too. There's another 59Fifty Michigan hat with a maize visor that is considerably brighter (almost like the Adidas maize), that has "MICHIGAN" on the back. The hat you posted is the Bo hat. It's the Michigan M, and a Michigan hat.The "Bo hat"... as in Schembechler? In that case, you should understand why I was skeptical of it being a Michigan hat since the M on Bo's hat was never anything but Michigan maize.Still, for the purposes of this thread, the hat could still pass for Brewers fashion gear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Geezus, admit defeat already. It's not even the same M the Brewers wore. There are noticeable differences. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSox44 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 The print logo would never work on a jersey, especially a pinstriped jersey.Yep. Far too thin.I prefer the cap logo over the others, but do not want to see it on the jerseys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.