TheOldRoman Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 [Loogodude] You guys are complaining about nothing. It looks just as good as the real Steelers' logo. [/oldschoolfan]
fumbler Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 I'd get that......on someone else's arm. RICHMOND TIGERS
CDixonDesign Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I'm still waiting on some heartwarming story of a little girl who is close to death, suffering from cancer, who all she wanted was her dad to get her drawing of the Steelers logo on his arm. Until then. Um, wow.
rtrich11 Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Don't drink and ink! cafepress.com/artbyrichards
habsfan1 Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I think what happened is that whoever drew it spelled it "Stealers", but then the guy realized it was misspelled, so he got an E scribbled over the whole thing.
Orgo Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I think what happened is that whoever drew it spelled it "Stealers", but then the guy realized it was misspelled, so he got an E scribbled over the whole thing.Or based on how scrunched the extra 'e' looks, it was probably 'Stelers.'
sportstar1212 Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I think what happened is that whoever drew it spelled it "Stealers", but then the guy realized it was misspelled, so he got an E scribbled over the whole thing.Or based on how scrunched the extra 'e' looks, it was probably 'Stelers.'I can hardly see the L. Looks like "Steeers" to me.
Shumway Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Western Pennsylvanian + Liquor Pierogie overload = That.Fixed it for you, Cujo.
Sodboy13 Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 He better have gotten that in prison. Against his will. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12.
Cujo Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Really, it's a toss-up between this Steelers tattoo or this one, which now seems even dumber after being traded:
oddball Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Sorry Cujo, but that Steelers one is worse because it was suppose to look like something. The Tebow one, while bad, is at least creative and original. The question is about the Steelers and I really can't call it a tatoo, more like utter crap, did the guy actually pay for that? I hope he got paid to put it on him, and something close to $1 million dollars, because it is that bad.
lancealot Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 kinda extreme for a baseball playerIf you think that's bad look up Dane Swan of the AFL
ridenlow71 Posted August 30, 2012 Posted August 30, 2012 There's no way that's real...and if it is why wouldn't you har it removed!!! Part owner in the Green Bay Packers
raysfan24 Posted August 30, 2012 Posted August 30, 2012 Looks like something that you create with a do-it-yourself tattoo kit.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.