TalktoChuck Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 LA Kings 2014.I love shield logos when they are done right and this one is perfect. It's really not. The shield the use is a miss-mash of the chevron logo and their original shield logo, and it uses the worst parts of each. The crown logo is far too detailed to be used at that size, and is barely recognizable on TV. And that LA font is awful and doesn't work with any of the other fonts that the team uses. It is a poorly slapped together logo.Just use the crown logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadojoker Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 if we go modern standards, and not stuff from the hand-drawn era, i'd say the Tampa Bay Lightning...That Lightning logo is classic!! You can't be serious. If by classic you mean "looks like it was designed by a 5th grader in powerpoint", then yesYea I guess. .growing up I always loved that jersey but looking back it looks like a superhero knockoff jersey. 2 dimensional shapes and ok design. But if you gave me a free jersey id wear it with pride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zee-Row Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 if we go modern standards, and not stuff from the hand-drawn era, i'd say the Tampa Bay Lightning...if we go modern standards, and not stuff from the hand-drawn era, i'd say the Tampa Bay Lightning...That uniform and the one after it are still better than the current uni and logo. The Lightning are a 90s team and I don't understand Yzerman's desire to make us look like an original Six team. Its such a boring uniform and I hate the lack of black and silver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soarindude Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 LA Kings 2014.I love shield logos when they are done right and this one is perfect. It's really not. The shield the use is a miss-mash of the chevron logo and their original shield logo, and it uses the worst parts of each. The crown logo is far too detailed to be used at that size, and is barely recognizable on TV. And that LA font is awful and doesn't work with any of the other fonts that the team uses. It is a poorly slapped together logo.Just use the crown logo.Everything said is true. God, every time I see this logo I cringe. It looks like a poorly drawn up division 3 American soccer crest, and that's probably the nicest description of what the LA Kings logo looks like.No purple? Okay. Getting rid of that nasty clip art crown as a logo? Okay. Replacing it with this? Quite possibly the only backwards step you could make with what the Kings used to have as an identity. Unfortunately my hopes of a complete rebrand have probably been lost after this title, I guess I'm going to have to get used to seeing this crappy crest for at least 10 more years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattb6 Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Another one if we consider the WNBA to be "pro".That actually looks pretty decent, imo. Better than the logo of a certain other basketball team in Minnesota, for sureno other basketball team in Minnesota has won a championshipHe's saying that the Lynx logo is better than the T-Wolves. At what point does he state the T-Wolves have won a title? I honestly think you post just to post, not trying to provide anything to the thread. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadojoker Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 Another one if we consider the WNBA to be "pro".That actually looks pretty decent, imo. Better than the logo of a certain other basketball team in Minnesota, for sureno other basketball team in Minnesota has won a championship He's saying that the Lynx logo is better than the T-Wolves. At what point does he state the T-Wolves have won a title? I honestly think you post just to post, not trying to provide anything to the thread.Have we forgotten about this team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderbread Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 Another one if we consider the WNBA to be "pro".That actually looks pretty decent, imo. Better than the logo of a certain other basketball team in Minnesota, for sureno other basketball team in Minnesota has won a championship He's saying that the Lynx logo is better than the T-Wolves. At what point does he state the T-Wolves have won a title? I honestly think you post just to post, not trying to provide anything to the thread.I was saying the T-wolves haven't won a championship or they would probably be in this thread too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadojoker Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 "no other basketball team in Minnesota has won a championship" - wonderbreadNo ones putting words in your mouth..but this is what you said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrodsep Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 Are you biased in anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Six Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 No, but he might be biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(probably)notabandwagonfan Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 The Yankees logo honestly makes no sense for the team in the color sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unocal Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 If you're gonna go after a Southeast Division Cup winner, I think Carolina 2006 is more worthy of that distinction than Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentColon Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 If you're gonna go after a Southeast Division Cup winner, I think Carolina 2006 is more worthy of that distinction than Tampa.I disagree. I mean it's not a great logo but when paired with those creative jerseys it made for a solid identity. Anaheim's is much worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rays Posted June 18, 2014 Author Share Posted June 18, 2014 Â LA Kings 2014.I love shield logos when they are done right and this one is perfect. It's really not. The shield the use is a miss-mash of the chevron logo and their original shield logo, and it uses the worst parts of each. The crown logo is far too detailed to be used at that size, and is barely recognizable on TV. And that LA font is awful and doesn't work with any of the other fonts that the team uses. It is a poorly slapped together logo.Just use the crown logo.Everything said is true. God, every time I see this logo I cringe. It looks like a poorly drawn up division 3 American soccer crest, and that's probably the nicest description of what the LA Kings logo looks like.No purple? Okay. Getting rid of that nasty clip art crown as a logo? Okay. Replacing it with this? Quite possibly the only backwards step you could make with what the Kings used to have as an identity. Unfortunately my hopes of a complete rebrand have probably been lost after this title, I guess I'm going to have to get used to seeing this crappy crest for at least 10 more years.I think the cup parade through town was pretty horrible, the logo was on the busses, and they were huge......+ cars with big flags with the logo on.........looks even worse when you make that logo bigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerFan98 Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rays Posted June 18, 2014 Author Share Posted June 18, 2014 LOL....my eyes ............anyway, about the Ducks, i think the duck foot on it´s own is a fine logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted June 18, 2014 Share Posted June 18, 2014 I disagree about the logo being the ugliest ever for a champ... but I think a case could be made for the Ravens to own the title of ugliest uniform to win a championshipThe black stripe-less pants, the same colored socks to create the yoga pants effect, and to top it off the abysmal Nike collar. (Dry heaving) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pengin. Posted June 19, 2014 Share Posted June 19, 2014 No joke, I do like the black and grey color scheme, but holy crap this is a bad logo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.