Jump to content

Washington Commanders to debut new NFL identity


DCarp1231

Recommended Posts

Last time I checked the Ravens started off with a fully intact built roster made over many years.

 

The Browns return included an expansion draft and dreadful play.

 

The only thing that was expansion was team name and history for the Ravens. 
 

I would also love to know if Indianapolis had any development or plans for a new nickname had Modell paid the $25 million for Colts.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Faxion said:

2022 is a major landmark for Washington in many ways. Ontop of completely rebranding the historic franchise, It marks the 90th anniversary of the 'Football Team'.

 

New name / New uniform + 90th Anniversary patch

 

 

spacer.png

Interesting...

 

2022 marks 90 years since 1932

 

That can only mean one thing...

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Faxion said:

Add to the nice clean NEW jersey an 'Inaugural' patch as it is the 1st year of a new team name and it will look like a patchwork mess

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

Don't forget "first year in a new stadium" patches! (Like Minnesota's)

spacer.png

spacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sykotyk said:

But it is. 

 

Old Browns fan here. The team was originally announced as the Baltimore Browns when the move was official. It was the leverage of Cleveland with their stadium lease and the NFL basically agreeing to give Cleveland a new team to end the threat of endless lawsuits that the deal to keep the name, colors, and history in Cleveland. 

 

This was before ANY games were played in Baltimore because Modell had no intention of giving up the name. In fact, Cleveland already approved the building of a new stadium before the Browns even finished playing in Cleveland. The argument modell used for moving them.

 

Which is sad because the Browns were offered a chance to be part of the Gateway Complex, but didn't want to give up the stadium he controlled for $1/year. Only when he lost the Indians rent, revenue and corporate money followed to the new Jacobs Field did he panick and demand a new stadium for the Browns.

 

The guy was a horrible businessman. Even after moving the team he still was forced to sell 99% of the team. And only kept the 1% so he could stiff someone else on money for a finders fee for helping to find a new owner. 

Doesnt them originally moving as the browns until Cleveland got upset further support that they are the same team?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dont care said:

Doesnt them originally moving as the browns until Cleveland got upset further support that they are the same team?

Are the Browns still the Browns if you replace every aspect about them, but keep the history only to restore them as a new franchise? Neither are the true Browns. Both are the true Browns.

 

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep--the Clevejack is in full effect now.

 

So here's a funny meme often passed around in trucking circles (just swap out "Swift" for "Clevejack")...

 

3c23fc165b473d00b805194d8086bc83.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 3

*Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. 😁

|| dribbble || Behance ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DCarp1231 said:

Are the Browns still the Browns if you replace every aspect about them, but keep the history only to restore them as a new franchise? Neither are the true Browns. Both are the true Browns.

 

Schrödinger's Football Team

  • Like 2

VmWIn6B.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Sykotyk said:
20 hours ago, IceCap said:

That's the legal fiction the NFL says happens. But it's not what actually happened.

 

But it is. 

 

But it isn't.

 

Art Modell moved the Cleveland Browns to Baltimore and they were renamed the Ravens, just as Bud Adams moved the Oilers to Tennessee and were renamed the Titans.  The *only* difference is Cleveland wanted to recycle the name "Browns", while the city of Houston didn't give two sh1ts about re-using "Oilers"

  • Like 4

6uXNWAo.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, WBeltz said:

When I get on here only to see people still arguing about the Browns/Ravens and Sonics/Thunder when you just wanted to see Washington mockups:

 

spacer.png


You clearly missed the big news. The reason for this is due to the Ravens moving to DC, the WFT to Indy, The Colts are going to Cleveland, the Browns are going to Baltimore to reclaim the Baltimore Browns name and that heritage lost oh so many years ago!!!
 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, insert name said:

I'm surprised how long we've allowed this conversation to go on for. 

Mod here.

I haven't stopped this conversation because what else is there to talk about? There is no news. The team announced a teaser, people speculated on what was in it, then there was a leak that seemed to confirm "Commanders" and a few logos.

Until the team confirms this, we get more leaks, or we make it to 2 February there's nothing much else to discuss. So if people wanna discuss Cleveland football history then ok. Go for it.

 

This whole thing will get washed away by discussions about actual news when actual news occurs.

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cujo said:

Art Modell moved the Cleveland Browns to Baltimore and they were renamed the Ravens, just as Bud Adams moved the Oilers to Tennessee and were renamed the Titans.  The *only* difference is Cleveland wanted to recycle the name "Browns", while the city of Houston didn't give two sh1ts about re-using "Oilers"

Actually, because Bud Adams was a garbage person, he made sure to have the Titans play as the Oilers temporarily specifically to avoid a "Cleveland Deal" scenario where the Oilers name and history was given back to Houston. So yes, the Oilers-to-Titans lineage remains because Bud Adams was a bad person, not because Houston didn't want the name "Oilers".

  • Like 5

the user formerly known as cdclt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, QCS said:

Actually, because Bud Adams was a garbage person, he made sure to have the Titans play as the Oilers temporarily specifically to avoid a "Cleveland Deal" scenario where the Oilers name and history was given back to Houston. So yes, the Oilers-to-Titans lineage remains because Bud Adams was a bad person, not because Houston didn't want the name "Oilers".

 

So in contrast, Art Modell was a good person?

 

Even with one year as "Tennessee Oilers", I don't believe for one second that prevented Houston from prying back "Oilers" had they wanted to. The city of Houston actually witnessed what happened with the Browns/Ravens before the Adams moved the team to Tennessee. Had Houston wanted to keep "Oilers", they would have made that "Cleveland Deal". They elected not to.

  • Like 3

6uXNWAo.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.