HOOVER Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 hour ago, Cujo said: We 99.99% know is that the Cyberhorse is sticking around and that they'll have their 80s look as their alternate uni. Sounds more and more like white helmets are a done-deal, based on what people with connections have heard. Everything else still feels up in the air, but the Denver flag/mountainy sleeves and "5280" on the pants seems on-point with how a Denver pro team re-brand would go in 2024. On it’s own, this helmet is really nice. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 I found myself surprisingly enjoying the Broncos white helmet last year. However, that design uses the throwback logo with the orange D and navy blue outline. The current white logo will not look as nice. It was clearly designed to go on a navy helmet. 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 hour ago, Cujo said: The extra orange keyline around the logo is especially pointless and unattractive. I think that even if this pedestrian design ends up being relatively close, that detail seems very unlikely. Quote http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 3 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: The extra orange keyline around the logo is especially pointless and unattractive. I think that even if this pedestrian design ends up being relatively close, that detail seems very unlikely. Agreeing with you here. As for the rest of the helmet, classic stripes are nice. I do like the navy facemask in the graphic. Or if not, maybe orange. Going with white is kinda "meh", copying what the Dolphins and Bills are doing with white/white. (And for the love of god DO NOT let it be gray) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KouPilot Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 3 hours ago, Cujo said: Possible Broncos unis based on "all the rumors" I present a terrible digibash of a UTAH player from years back of this idea 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 3 hours ago, HOOVER said: Absolutely cannot stand defensive backs wearing numbers between 10-19. Makes me want to :censored:ing vomit. also single digits. Not that I have any Fs to give over Kenny Pickett, but he can't keep his #8 because a safety that they just brought back for a second stint chose 8 over his previous number with the team (23) which was available. So a safety is blocking a QB over #8. Goddam ridiculous. And even though he's never worn it, he's not giving it up because it's a tribute to Kobe So again, while I couldn't care much less about Kenny Pickett, his only options are 7 (which just became available), 13, and 16 (also just became available.). A week ago, only 13 was available. It's absurd that a QB has lieterally one number to "choose" from, because DBs, DEs, and other jabroni-ass jabronis are hogging all the QB numbers. To be fair, the Eagles have retired or removed from circulation 5 (retired - McNabb), 9 (out of circulation - Big Dick Nick Foles), 12 (out of circulation, sorta - Cunningham), and 15 (retired - Steve Van Buren.) 3 1 Quote "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damnyoutuesday Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Unpopular opinion: I don't care what numbers defensive players wear 8 1 2 Quote Sorry, I'm on an iPad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udubfan19 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 I had successfully un HOU-TEN jacked the thread. now its DEN jacked EDIT: not yet DEN jacked 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 1 hour ago, KouPilot said: I present a terrible digibash of a UTAH player from years back of this idea No chance they do 'realistic' mountains should they be doing that with the sleeves. Gotta believe they'd with the dual zig-zag mountains (which we've seen in many the concepts) which mimics the Denver city flag. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfraser85 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 21 minutes ago, Cujo said: No chance they do 'realistic' mountains should they be doing that with the sleeves. Gotta believe they'd with the dual zig-zag mountains (which we've seen in many the concepts) which mimics the Denver city flag. That could actually work, at least for the orange and navy jerseys. I guess the white jerseys could have navy skies with orange mountains for the sleeves. Just no side panels if they want the jerseys and pants to be interchangeable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Commanders Player usage of numbers by position- 0-9 QB - 1 RB - 1 WR - 2 LB - 1 DE - 1 K/P - 2 7 & 9 are out of circulation 10-19 QB - 2 WR - 5 DB - 4 11 (QB/S) & 16 (QB/DB) are being double used (not uncommon for offseason) 12 is not in use Number distribution isn’t horrible, but it’s not getting any better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruttep Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 2 hours ago, MNtwins3 said: Unpopular opinion: I don't care what numbers defensive players wear Really unpopular opinion: I don't care what any players wear. The trend of players wearing numbers that aren't traditionally assigned to their position isn't going anywhere and I never saw it as that big of a deal. As long as the numbers can still correctly indicate which players are eligible to touch the ball, I don't care if there's a WR wearing number 1 or a DB wearing number 6. 7 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBomb Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Any word since the draft cap leak on when the Jets are unveiling their "new" uniforms? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssj_homeslice Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 (edited) disregard Edited April 4 by ssj_homeslice Didn't read the original comment i was quoting all of the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatic Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 3 hours ago, udubfan19 said: I had successfully un HOU-TEN jacked the thread. now its DEN jacked EDIT: not yet DEN jacked What? Who are you? Discussing upcoming uniform changes of a team is not "jacking" a thread. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Why the would Denver switch to a white helmet? Good Christ is that an infuriatingly bad idea. This has been a blue helmet team for like half a century now, and even before that they never wore a white helmet. They’re about to sacrifice like 50 years of brand consistency for this tacky “icy” 5280/CoLoRaDo PrIdE nonsense. Colorado has a dumbass flag anyway. I legit hate that goofy Cubs logo with a sun in it looking ass logo. “Well, Coloradans love it!” Don’t care. Then you’re all dumb with bad taste. 7 9 1 Quote On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 7 hours ago, FiddySicks said: They’re about to sacrifice like 50 years of brand consistency for this tacky “icy” 5280/CoLoRaDo PrIdE nonsense. This is new ownership's (Walton/Penner/Condi/Hammy's) way putting their own stamp on the team. The Broncos went a completely different direction in '97 and those unis became modern classics. I'm assuming that's their thinking now. 7 hours ago, FiddySicks said: Colorado has a dumbass flag anyway. I legit hate that goofy Cubs logo with a sun in it looking ass logo. “Well, Coloradans love it!” Don’t care. Then you’re all dumb with bad taste. That flag/symbol is overkill out here. Anyone in Colorado seen sporting "that goofy Cubs logo with a sun in it looking ass logo" is either tourist or is someone who just moved here from out-of-state. Locals steer clear of it these days, as it's basically the easy way to spot an outsider/poser. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old School Fool Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 1 hour ago, FiddySicks said: Colorado has a dumbass flag anyway. I legit hate that goofy Cubs logo with a sun in it looking ass logo. “Well, Coloradans love it!” Don’t care. Then you’re all dumb with bad taste. What did the state of Colorado do to you? 8 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOVER Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 6 hours ago, FiddySicks said: Why the would Denver switch to a white helmet? Good Christ is that an infuriatingly bad idea. This has been a blue helmet team for like half a century now, and even before that they never wore a white helmet. They’re about to sacrifice like 50 years of brand consistency for this tacky “icy” 5280/CoLoRaDo PrIdE nonsense. Colorado has a dumbass flag anyway. I legit hate that goofy Cubs logo with a sun in it looking ass logo. “Well, Coloradans love it!” Don’t care. Then you’re all dumb with bad taste. All-time great post. Love it. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 15 hours ago, Cujo said: That's because it is. I want to see a “which Broncos have better threads” article on bleacherreport or a similar site, comparing Boise State with Denver, once Denver’s new look is official. Spoiler alert: it may not be the pro team that looks better. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.