Dnice Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Not sure if anyone else had any pics, but I brought one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 nice Dnice On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Nice picture, although that will be the closest it will comes to getting built. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgesL Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Not sure if anyone else had any pics, but I brought one. Does this have a retractable roof? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Not sure if anyone else had any pics, but I brought one. Kinda off topic, but the people {including the players} look like Madden 99, with the stadium of Madden 2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclopsis Joe Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Not sure if anyone else had any pics, but I brought one. Schweet. I don't speak for democrats, democrats don't speak for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_Am_God Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Not sure if anyone else had any pics, but I brought one.Does this have a retractable roof? Retractable roof?! Retractable roof?! Why does a football team need a retractable roof? The game is meant to be played in the elements for crying out loud! No sissies allowed! Who is this Murphy and when did he become the law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 That stadium will be built.It has a roof, because can you imagin? Super Bowl XLV - New York City?Rock On, Baby. Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez Street Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Super Bowl in NY, that would be GREAT! @DavidStreeter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 YEAH! A Yankee SuperBowl should be too nice! It's great to be young and a Giant! - Larry Doyle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosox Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 If said this before...if the Jets get the land, then the stadium will be built. No doubt. That is just what I have heard. It all rests on the MTA's shoulders now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 Not sure if anyone else had any pics, but I brought one.Does this have a retractable roof? Retractable roof?! Retractable roof?! Why does a football team need a retractable roof? The game is meant to be played in the elements for crying out loud! No sissies allowed! Dude, calm down.A retractable roof would make it suitable for conventions and other indoor (olympic?) events. It doesn't mean they'll be playing football inside.And, as a stadium employee who had to shovel tons of snow this year, I can definately appreciate a stadium with a roof that can be closed prior to blizzards. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJTank Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 The roof will also bring the Final Four to New York. www.sportsecyclopedia.com For the best in sports history go to the Sports E-Cyclopedia at http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 The roof will also bring the Final Four to New York. Good call. I forgot about that. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrdevil Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 If said this before...if the Jets get the land, then the stadium will be built. No doubt. That is just what I have heard. It all rests on the MTA's shoulders now. Not exactly, the residents there can still block it like they did the West Side Highway. $600 million would be comming from the city, they will try to stop that first. After that they will probably just sue the city and the Jets to death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mings Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 If said this before...if the Jets get the land, then the stadium will be built. No doubt. That is just what I have heard. It all rests on the MTA's shoulders now. Not exactly, the residents there can still block it like they did the West Side Highway. $600 million would be comming from the city, they will try to stop that first. After that they will probably just sue the city and the Jets to death. if it gets to that point, what they can do is declare the land blighted and take it by emminent domain. you cant sue to stop emminent domain, its in the constitiution, i believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosox Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 If said this before...if the Jets get the land, then the stadium will be built. No doubt. That is just what I have heard. It all rests on the MTA's shoulders now. Not exactly, the residents there can still block it like they did the West Side Highway. $600 million would be comming from the city, they will try to stop that first. After that they will probably just sue the city and the Jets to death. True, true. I meant as in the city and the Jets have a deal, and without any public outcry, etc., it'll be built. Funny enough that all the commercials against the stadium, are piad for by none other than MSG, no city groups themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfwabel Posted February 13, 2005 Share Posted February 13, 2005 Under the law of eniment domain, a city may take privete property for a public use, without the owner's consent, if the owner is compensated for the full property value of the property. The 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution sets linits to this power. In the 1980's both the cities of Oakland (CA) and Baltimore (MD) attempted to use eniment domain in an attempt to keep the Raiders and Colts respectively through the courts. Both were denied. However, cities have and do use this law for what is perceived as their best interest. Lately, or the most coverage for this is for stadiums and arenas. Camden Yards and other downtown facilities are the most notable. Before you talk about what is best for a city or downtown development, you may want to try to read "Playing the Field" by charles Euchner or "Major League Losers" by Mark Rosentraub, which go in detain about public financing for stadiums and arenas. That does not include books about the corruption and bribery inside the International Olympic Committee, however that is another thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.