Jump to content

New Orleans Saints to ?


uozzim

Recommended Posts

I'm already upset by the idea that the New York Giants are taking advantage of a storm-torn city by adding an extra home game to their schedule.

You're kidding, right? New York is taking advantage of New Orleans.

The Giants offered to host the Saints because they know that it is difficult to arrange stadium accomodation for a football team on short notice.

Paul Tagliabue made the final decision to have the game played in New York, which by the way is the biggest city in the United States.

 

 

sticksstones4.png

The world's foremost practitioners of professional tag-team wrestling.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply
uh I heard it was so destroyed by the refugees inside that its virturall uninhabbitable.

Uh, please don't refer to them as "refugees."

Why not? Why is it that Americans have a problem with that word? Do we think we are too good to have refugees at any time no matter the circumstance? These are people who have been forced from their homes and are in desperate need of food, water, and shelter. I dunno about you, but that sounds like a refugee to me. Plus, i think that instead of worrying about what to call these people, we should worry more about how to help them out. Plus, calling them refugees is better than calling them poor, recently made homeless people is it not?

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh I heard it was so destroyed by the refugees inside that its virturall uninhabbitable.

Uh, please don't refer to them as "refugees."

Why not? Why is it that Americans have a problem with that word? Do we think we are too good to have refugees at any time no matter the circumstance? These are people who have been forced from their homes and are in desperate need of food, water, and shelter. I dunno about you, but that sounds like a refugee to me. Plus, i think that instead of worrying about what to call these people, we should worry more about how to help them out. Plus, calling them refugees is better than calling them poor, recently made homeless people is it not?

The best thing to call them is Americans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe Saints shouldn't play in San Antonio - there's not enough luxury boxed there.

Nope, the only fair solution might be to let them play a road schedule. Besides, it doesn't make that much difference to teams like the Jets and Patriots. They have home games against the Saints anyways, or the Seahawks, who don't play them at all.

LvZYtbZ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh I heard it was so destroyed by the refugees inside that its virturall uninhabbitable.

Uh, please don't refer to them as "refugees."

Why not? Why is it that Americans have a problem with that word? Do we think we are too good to have refugees at any time no matter the circumstance? These are people who have been forced from their homes and are in desperate need of food, water, and shelter. I dunno about you, but that sounds like a refugee to me. Plus, i think that instead of worrying about what to call these people, we should worry more about how to help them out. Plus, calling them refugees is better than calling them poor, recently made homeless people is it not?

The best thing to call them is Americans.

I don't think anyone said that they weren't. They are refugees, since they are taking refuge elsewhere than where they are from. It's just another PC thing. So what's correct -- displaced Americans?

shysters_sm.jpg

"One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Evacuees" works for me. All of them have evacuated the ravaged area.

"Refugees" does sound a little third world-ish. And it usually associated to very poor people, not just those displaced by a natural disaster.

Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe Saints shouldn't play in San Antonio - there's not enough luxury boxed there.

Nope, the only fair solution might be to let them play a road schedule.

How does fair have anything to do with it? Fair to who? The team would be hurt travelling all sixteen weeks. :rolleyes:

shysters_sm.jpg

"One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it posted, but it's been announced that the Week 2 Saints/Giants game being played at the Meadowlands, will be played on a Monday night.

I heard it's at 7:30 p.m. on ABC. Then it's switching to ESPN when the original MNF game starts. I guess the ESPN crew's going to call the game.

On January 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, NJTank said:

Btw this is old hat for Notre Dame. Knits Rockne made up George Tip's death bed speech.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see it posted, but it's been announced that the Week 2 Saints/Giants game being played at the Meadowlands, will be played on a Monday night.

I heard it's at 7:30 p.m. on ABC. Then it's switching to ESPN when the original MNF game starts. I guess the ESPN crew's going to call the game.

How about a link?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/foot...e.ap/index.html

I saw, I came, I left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Sportsline says they are going to push for San Antonio AND the Superdome is going to be imploded...which leaves them out without a home for more than just this season.

Edit: Sportsline has changed their story and is exlcuding any mention of any thing Super Dome related. Must not be substantiated yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe Saints shouldn't play in San Antonio - there's not enough luxury boxed there.

Nope, the only fair solution might be to let them play a road schedule. Besides, it doesn't make that much difference to teams like the Jets and Patriots. They have home games against the Saints anyways, or the Seahawks, who don't play them at all.

The problem there is that they'd still lose money, since it's not likely that the host team would give them 100% game revenue. At least let them have a temporary "home," because people in San Antonio would likely frequently attend NFL games in their hometown.

VmWIn6B.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Monday, Sept. 19, Giants/Saints will start at 7:30pm on ABC.

At 9:00pm, ABC will switch to Redskins/Cowboys, except in New York and on the Gulf Coast. Giants/Saints will move to ESPN. (In NY and the Gulf Coast, Redskins/Cowboys will be on ESPN until the end of the first game.)

It doesn't say which broadcast crew will handle which game.

story on nfl.com

story on espn.com

CK3ZP8E.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.