Jump to content


Photo

NFL number fonts


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 Slater

Slater
  • Member

  • Members
  • 158 posts
  • Joined: Dec 23/04
    • Location:Arizona


Posted August 29, 2011 - 07:51

Does each NFL team have a unique jersey number font, or do some teams share similar fonts?

#2 canzman

canzman
  • Member

  • Members
  • 575 posts
  • Joined: Aug 7/04
    • Location:Orlando, FL


Posted August 29, 2011 - 08:45

To my knowledge 17 teams use unique numbers and are as follows:
Bears
Bengals
Broncos
Cardinals
Chargers
Dolphins (only really due to the drop shadowing)
Eagles
Falcons
Jaguars
Lions
Patriots
Rams
Ravens
Steelers
Texans
Titans
Vikings

All other teams use traditional block, or a slight variant.

#3 Bouj

Bouj
  • Member

  • Members
  • 1,330 posts
  • Joined: Apr 19/05
    • Location:Clutch City (Houston, TX)


Posted August 29, 2011 - 09:08

We've come a long way from the days of the early 90's when teams wore traditional block or Champion block, and rarely anything else. Were the Steelers' move to that stylized Nike font the first of the custom fonts, or do the Bears or Dolphins pre-date them?
Go Astros!
Go Texans!
Go Rockets!
Go Javelinas!

#4 the admiral

the admiral
  • Member

  • Members
  • 20,401 posts
  • Joined: May 30/07


Posted August 29, 2011 - 09:25

The Bears predate everyone. They've had their numbers since at least the '60s.

The Patriots' drop-shadow italic hhad to be one of the first custom fonts. Eagles had their numbers before the Steelers had theirs, too.

Ever since the 21st century, every new uniform has been virtually required to use a proprietary font to guard against counterfeiters, who have easy access to public-domain varisty block typefaces. This has made for a lot of weird number sets, like the Cardinals and Vikings who are trying for all the world to use plain old block numbers but still need some quirks to them.

EDIT: I suppose this ended with the Bills?



#5 TheOldRoman

TheOldRoman
  • Oh, you didn't know?

  • Members
  • 4,908 posts
  • Joined: Nov 4/05


Posted August 29, 2011 - 09:44

I think the custom font thing was not to guard against counterfeiters (they make the stuff, anyway). It was so someone couldn't buy a $5 jersey or shirt from Walmart, take it to his local screen printer and have authentic numbering put on. Other than possibly the Packers font with the notch in the 5, screenprinters could likely use any block without having to pay. Yet for some reason, they always end up using the garbage font the Sixers and Jazz use.
Posted Image

#6 WSU151

WSU151
  • Creating something totally illogical

  • Members
  • 6,641 posts
  • Joined: Jan 17/05
    • Location:DC area via Denver, CO


Posted August 29, 2011 - 09:53

Admiral is correct...Bears were first, the Patriots had shadow-italic in '95, then the Eagles' font and the Ravens' font debuted in '96 I believe the Niners went full time shadow-block in '96 as well. Steelers, Jaguars, Broncos, and Dolphins changed fonts in '97.

Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half.

 

 


#7 BrandMooreArt

BrandMooreArt
  • Independent Graphic Artist

  • Members
  • 3,430 posts
  • Joined: Mar 6/09
    • Location:Indiana


Posted August 29, 2011 - 11:37

Colts are using Champion block. not sure if anyone else uses it or not. maybe Green Bay?

#8 TheOldRoman

TheOldRoman
  • Oh, you didn't know?

  • Members
  • 4,908 posts
  • Joined: Nov 4/05


Posted August 29, 2011 - 11:46

You must be confused about what Champion block is. For most of us, Champion block is the thick, rounded block numbers which the Bills, Jets, Bengals and Saints wore in the '90s when Champion made their unis. The Colts wore it for a few years in the Jeff George era, but they don't use anything close to these numbers now:

Posted Image
Posted Image

#9 Chazberg

Chazberg
  • Less, but better.

  • Members
  • 1,856 posts
  • Joined: Feb 7/03
    • Location:Chicago, IL


Posted August 29, 2011 - 12:57

Yeah, you could always tell a Champion font by the awful slanted '2's and curvey '7', not to mention the helvetica-looking nameplates. I remember silently laughing at kids in school who wore those. Kinda like the original Korean counterfeit of the jersey world ^_^

Personally, I don't think custom fonts need justification, other than they're pretty cool and give a team a unique look (other than the Bengals totally ripping off the Bears). I think in a day and age when we have such ability to do different things with jerseys, why not break away from the antiquated block numbers?

#10 Julius Seizure

Julius Seizure
  • Member

  • Members
  • 348 posts
  • Joined: Mar 29/10
    • Location:Univ. of North Texas

    • Favourite Logos:London Monarchs, NOLA Hornets "fleur de bee", Vancouver Grizzlies secondary

Posted August 29, 2011 - 13:37

The Redskins wore something close to Bodoni Bold in 1945.

Posted Image

...and the Browns wore shadowed blocks when they were in the AAFC.

Posted Image

Founder and Commissioner, World Gridiron

 


#11 TheOldRoman

TheOldRoman
  • Oh, you didn't know?

  • Members
  • 4,908 posts
  • Joined: Nov 4/05


Posted August 29, 2011 - 14:53

Yeah, you could always tell a Champion font by the awful slanted '2's and curvey '7', not to mention the helvetica-looking nameplates. I remember silently laughing at kids in school who wore those. Kinda like the original Korean counterfeit of the jersey world ^_^

Personally, I don't think custom fonts need justification, other than they're pretty cool and give a team a unique look (other than the Bengals totally ripping off the Bears). I think in a day and age when we have such ability to do different things with jerseys, why not break away from the antiquated block numbers?

Possibly because block fonts aren't antiquated at all and most of the teams which use custom fonts would look better with a variation of a block font.
Posted Image

#12 BringBackTheVet

BringBackTheVet
  • 35 - 0, 29 KO

  • Members
  • 18,774 posts
  • Joined: May 28/04
    • Location:The Big Scrapple


Posted August 29, 2011 - 15:40


Yeah, you could always tell a Champion font by the awful slanted '2's and curvey '7', not to mention the helvetica-looking nameplates. I remember silently laughing at kids in school who wore those. Kinda like the original Korean counterfeit of the jersey world ^_^

Personally, I don't think custom fonts need justification, other than they're pretty cool and give a team a unique look (other than the Bengals totally ripping off the Bears). I think in a day and age when we have such ability to do different things with jerseys, why not break away from the antiquated block numbers?

Possibly because block fonts aren't antiquated at all and most of the teams which use custom fonts would look better with a variation of a block font.


Custom for Custom's Sake is bad, as is Block for Block's Sake. The worst is when the two extremes meet, as seen with the Vikings. They have a "designed" contemporary uniform, yet wanted traditional block numbers, just 'cause. They made minor mods to the block just to make it proprietary, making it a custom block for custom block's sake. They really should have come up with a font that better complemented the design of the uniforms.

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."


#13 sc49erfan15

sc49erfan15
  • Mascot Extraordinaire

  • Members
  • 5,848 posts
  • Joined: Mar 15/03
    • Location:Neptune, New Jersey


Posted August 29, 2011 - 15:55

FWIW, the AFL had two teams that used non-block numbers as well:

Posted Image
1962 Raiders - in black and gold, with :censored: ing huge numbers

Posted Image
1960 Oilers - similar to Raiders, worn as part of the 2009 AFL Throwbacks

Also, during a stint in the 1970s (this photo says 1973) the Bears wore regular block before switching back. Not sure why.

Posted Image

#14 TheOldRoman

TheOldRoman
  • Oh, you didn't know?

  • Members
  • 4,908 posts
  • Joined: Nov 4/05


Posted August 29, 2011 - 16:38

The Bears only wore regular block on the road, and I believe it was for one season.
Posted Image

#15 Slater

Slater
  • Member

  • Members
  • 158 posts
  • Joined: Dec 23/04
    • Location:Arizona


Posted August 29, 2011 - 17:27

Some of the "blockiest" block numerals I can recall were on the Rams' old Royal Blue/Yellow uniforms, and I thought they worked pretty well. Is there an official name for that particular style?

#16 andrewharrington

andrewharrington
  • The Go-Getter

  • Members
  • 5,474 posts
  • Joined: Aug 10/04
    • Location:Cleveland, OH > Indianapolis, IN


Posted August 29, 2011 - 18:36

Admiral is correct...Bears were first, the Patriots had shadow-italic in '95, then the Eagles' font and the Ravens' font debuted in '96 I believe the Niners went full time shadow-block in '96 as well. Steelers, Jaguars, Broncos, and Dolphins changed fonts in '97.


The Bears were not the first team to use numerals other than a standard athletic block. Far from it. Teams had been doing custom numerals decades before the Bears. The Redskins, for example, used both a curly, UCLA-esque numeral as well as a style similar to what the Pirates wear in MLB. The Bears just happen to be the first team who stuck with their custom numerals and made it part of their trademark look.
I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry

[The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of the adidas Group and its brands.]

#17 andrewharrington

andrewharrington
  • The Go-Getter

  • Members
  • 5,474 posts
  • Joined: Aug 10/04
    • Location:Cleveland, OH > Indianapolis, IN


Posted August 29, 2011 - 18:49

On another note, there are a handful of teams that use 'standard' block numerals, however, many of them have little quirks that make them unique, and even teams that share the same torso numerals may use different TV numerals. The company that produces the on-field uniforms, Ripon Athletic, actually has a standard block numeral set that is shared by a few teams (Browns, Chiefs, etc.) This used to be standard practice, as each manufacturer used to have their own unique block numeral set, so the Champion teams would have a certain set of numerals, while the Wilson teams would have another (I think this might be what the 49ers use), and so on.

Personally, I wonder if we will see all the block numeral teams switch over to the standard Nike block numerals, which are a bit more crisp and modern than many of the NFL teams' numerals.
I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry

[The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of the adidas Group and its brands.]

#18 buckeyenut

buckeyenut
  • Member

  • Members
  • 200 posts
  • Joined: Nov 4/05


Posted August 29, 2011 - 19:57

On another note, there are a handful of teams that use 'standard' block numerals, however, many of them have little quirks that make them unique, and even teams that share the same torso numerals may use different TV numerals. The company that produces the on-field uniforms, Ripon Athletic, actually has a standard block numeral set that is shared by a few teams (Browns, Chiefs, etc.) This used to be standard practice, as each manufacturer used to have their own unique block numeral set, so the Champion teams would have a certain set of numerals, while the Wilson teams would have another (I think this might be what the 49ers use), and so on.

Personally, I wonder if we will see all the block numeral teams switch over to the standard Nike block numerals, which are a bit more crisp and modern than many of the NFL teams' numerals.

I'm sure I have seen it before, but what is Nike block? Who uses it?
Posted Image
Posted Image

#19 Buc

Buc
  • absoBUC'nlutely....

  • Members
  • 7,500 posts
  • Joined: Apr 20/06
    • Location:(still) somewhere over the road

    • Favourite Logos:Bucco Bruce // Iowa State Cyclones // the original Vancouver Grizzlies // Philadelphia Union // Coastal Carolina Chanticleers

Posted August 29, 2011 - 20:58

Clemson, Missouri, Pitt (now), just to name a few.

3x POTD winner:20101229 | 20120728 | 20130924* || dribbble || Behance


#20 Shumway

Shumway
  • Rally Time!

  • Members
  • 9,286 posts
  • Joined: Apr 22/05
    • Location:Downingtown, PA

    • Favourite Logos:Anything with a mascot in a sweater or anthropomorphic foods.

Posted August 29, 2011 - 21:02

FWIW, the AFL had two teams that used non-block numbers as well:

Posted Image
1962 Raiders - in black and gold, with :censored: ing huge numbers

I honestly had no idea Tommy Gibbs played football. I'm stupid.