monkeypower Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 On 4/25/2024 at 8:40 PM, monkeypower said: These are blue and not purple right? I'm not seeing incorrectly? Regardless, it definitely doesn't match the purple of the hats and belts (nor the logos nor the merch). I have to assume this is UA not being able to produce the purple because the team did tweet something a while back about ordering purple jerseys. The Berries also revealed a third set a couple days and I like these a lot. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 Some Hagerstown Flying Box Cars uniforms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Yellow Flag Posted May 13 Share Posted May 13 "Hub City" is a nickname used by 27 cities across North America, including multiple homes of major and minor league teams (per Wikipedia). I truly don't understand the trend of using nicknames as the official name, or of releasing thirty specialty logos right off the bat. We all know they're going to have a bunch of alternates, like all MILB teams, and that's what this looks like, a standard food-based alternate that's going to be worn every night. Saskatoon's jerseys look good, especially the powder, but putting the entire logo on the hat instead of just the berry is a swing and a miss. Hagerstown looks great (and proves my point about Hub City). 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sykotyk Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 14 hours ago, Big Yellow Flag said: "Hub City" is a nickname used by 27 cities across North America, including multiple homes of major and minor league teams (per Wikipedia). I truly don't understand the trend of using nicknames as the official name, or of releasing thirty specialty logos right off the bat. We all know they're going to have a bunch of alternates, like all MILB teams, and that's what this looks like, a standard food-based alternate that's going to be worn every night. Saskatoon's jerseys look good, especially the powder, but putting the entire logo on the hat instead of just the berry is a swing and a miss. Hagerstown looks great (and proves my point about Hub City). And Queen City, as well. Though to a lesser extent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shumway Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 On 5/12/2024 at 10:23 AM, CaliforniaGlowin said: SPARTANBURGERS ARE BACK!! In lime green!!! The single A Down East Wood Ducks will become them next year. That name was used for a single season CPL team years ago. That HC logo should be the main hat logo. The burger is too detailed for a hat. I immediately bought the hamburger hat when these were announced. That logo is fantastic. (My MiLB Cap collection is growing at an incredible rate lately ) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaGlowin Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 I was thinking the burger logo is too busy for a hat. I like the HC logo a lot better. Quote Last updated 8/9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shumway Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 7 hours ago, CaliforniaGlowin said: I was thinking the burger logo is too busy for a hat. I like the HC logo a lot better. But that hat doesn't have an adorable hamburger on it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 Most minor league teams will use a non monogram logo for the primary hat for licensing purposes. This way they can license their logo/apparel to little league teams. I know in my area there's plenty of Yard Goats, Threshers, Bananas, Trash Pandas, etc. almost just as frequently if not more often than Yankees, Rays, Braves, etc. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sec19Row53 Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 53 minutes ago, TBGKon said: Most minor league teams will use a non monogram logo for the primary hat for licensing purposes. This way they can license their logo/apparel to little league teams. I know in my area there's plenty of Yard Goats, Threshers, Bananas, Trash Pandas, etc. almost just as frequently if not more often than Yankees, Rays, Braves, etc. That makes a ton of sense. I never thought about it. Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burmy Posted May 18 Share Posted May 18 21 hours ago, TBGKon said: Most minor league teams will use a non monogram logo for the primary hat for licensing purposes. This way they can license their logo/apparel to little league teams. I know in my area there's plenty of Yard Goats, Threshers, Bananas, Trash Pandas, etc. almost just as frequently if not more often than Yankees, Rays, Braves, etc. I still remember when the Lowell Spinners had a program where they would donate Spinners little league uniforms to New England leagues in exchange for those leagues dropping the Yankees...given how these poor kids who played for the little Yankees would see no end of bullying, I always liked the Spinners' kind gesture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORLMagic86 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 On 5/18/2024 at 3:53 PM, Burmy said: I still remember when the Lowell Spinners had a program where they would donate Spinners little league uniforms to New England leagues in exchange for those leagues dropping the Yankees...given how these poor kids who played for the little Yankees would see no end of bullying, I always liked the Spinners' kind gesture. You have to be insane to live in Massachusetts and name your child's little league team after the Yankees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrutigerAero Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 So apparently all minor league teams have the same logo style? Is this cuz of them all being designed by the same group or something like that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORLMagic86 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 8 hours ago, FrutigerAero said: So apparently all minor league teams have the same logo style? Is this cuz of them all being designed by the same group or something like that? This is what happens when the majority of MiLB teams have their logos created by the same two design studios, Studio Simon and Brandiose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 6 hours ago, ORLMagic86 said: This is what happens when the majority of MiLB teams have their logos created by the same two design studios, Studio Simon and Brandiose. Granted one of them does better at variety. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrutigerAero Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 57 minutes ago, Dynasty said: Granted one of them does better at variety. Which one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 6 hours ago, FrutigerAero said: Which one? I was referring to Studio Simon. They're able to apply different elements to each of the different brands they create for teams. Brandiose relies too much on being gimmicky with their implementation of adjective-noun names and the same googly eyed, teeth-grinning, anthropomorphic mascot logos. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 https://sanantonioreport.org/bexar-county-missions-baseball-stadium-public-private-partnership-peter-sakai/ The San Antonio Missions are hopeful of getting a new downtown stadium. Though the Wolff is still a decent stadium, it's not up to the new MiLB/MLB rules. With the Spurs looking at moving across the road from the Alamodome, you could have a situation that most cities seem to want now, where the sports arenas are all within walking distance of each other. Having the team move up to AAA, and then drop back to AA, it'd be a shame if they got moved out because they can't get a deal done. This is the site most people believe is in play. It's not right next to the other site that the Spurs would use, but it's still not too far away from the Alamodome/Texas Institute of Cultures area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCall Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 29 minutes ago, MJWalker45 said: https://sanantonioreport.org/bexar-county-missions-baseball-stadium-public-private-partnership-peter-sakai/ The San Antonio Missions are hopeful of getting a new downtown stadium. Though the Wolff is still a decent stadium, it's not up to the new MiLB/MLB rules. With the Spurs looking at moving across the road from the Alamodome, you could have a situation that most cities seem to want now, where the sports arenas are all within walking distance of each other. Having the team move up to AAA, and then drop back to AA, it'd be a shame if they got moved out because they can't get a deal done. This is the site most people believe is in play. It's not right next to the other site that the Spurs would use, but it's still not too far away from the Alamodome/Texas Institute of Cultures area. San Antonio's always been in the conversation for MLB expansion (largely because they keep saying they're in the conversation for MLB expansion). So is this being discussed as one of those "designed for expansion" stadiums or just purely for Minor League Baseball? Quote https://dribbble.com/MakaioCall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 31 minutes ago, McCall said: San Antonio's always been in the conversation for MLB expansion (largely because they keep saying they're in the conversation for MLB expansion). So is this being discussed as one of those "designed for expansion" stadiums or just purely for Minor League Baseball? I'd expect they want to be able to expand the stadium, but I don't know if there is anyone here that wants anything other than minor league baseball. Nolan Ryan is part of the current ownership group. San Antonio is always in the discussion for everything except hockey for some reason, but Houston and Dallas are still in the neighborhood and those owners don't like losing potential customers to another team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schlim Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 3 hours ago, MJWalker45 said: With the Spurs looking at moving across the road from the Alamodome Wait, the Spurs are looking at a new stadium? The Alamodome was built in 1993 The current Spurs arena opened in 2002. San Antonio is really giving Arlington a run for its money building new stadiums! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.