Cujo Posted August 8, 2008 Author Share Posted August 8, 2008 The Favre parade finally hits the Big Apple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted August 8, 2008 Share Posted August 8, 2008 I still like "The Gridiron Man" better than "Broadway Brett."Mostly because that photo op is the closest Brett's ever going to get to the neon lights of Midtown. Joe lived in it, Brett won't even visit. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 He looks happy as hell to be there.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckymack Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Brady shouldn't be in the top 10. No way in Hell. If Peyton Manning had half the team(and scheme, and willingness to cheat) that Brady has, he'd have seven rings by now. Hell, that goes for several other quarterbacks in the league right now. Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Brett Favre; just to name a few off the top of my head.As you can tell, I never punched my ticket to the Brady Bandwagon. Sigs are for sissies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Island_Style Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Brady shouldn't be in the top 10. No way in Hell. If Peyton Manning had half the team(and scheme, and willingness to cheat) that Brady has, he'd have seven rings by now. Hell, that goes for several other quarterbacks in the league right now. Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Brett Favre; just to name a few off the top of my head.As you can tell, I never punched my ticket to the Brady Bandwagon.I don't like saying it but I disagree. Manning has had a solid team around him for years. I think Brady would have done just as well with Manning's team. Brady does deserve to be mentioned in the top ten. What more does the guy have to do? That is like saying Montana doesn't deserve to be mentioned on that list because his teams were great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Brady shouldn't be in the top 10. No way in Hell. If Peyton Manning had half the team(and scheme, and willingness to cheat) that Brady has, he'd have seven rings by now. Hell, that goes for several other quarterbacks in the league right now. Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Brett Favre; just to name a few off the top of my head.As you can tell, I never punched my ticket to the Brady Bandwagon.Brady is better than every QB you mentioned in your rant. He's one of the all-time greats. Deal with it. And as I have mentioned before, I am no fan of Boston sports but facts are facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted August 9, 2008 Author Share Posted August 9, 2008 Brady shouldn't be in the top 10. No way in Hell. If Peyton Manning had half the team(and scheme, and willingness to cheat) that Brady has, he'd have seven rings by now. Hell, that goes for several other quarterbacks in the league right now. Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Brett Favre; just to name a few off the top of my head.As you can tell, I never punched my ticket to the Brady Bandwagon.Brady is better than every QB you mentioned in your rant. He's one of the all-time greats. Deal with it. And as I have mentioned before, I am no fan of Boston sports but facts are facts.Before 2007, I probably wouldn't have put Tom Brady in my Top 10 since his regular season numbers weren't exactly spectacular. But after the sick numbers he put up last year and leading the Pats to an undefeated regular season, you almost have to include him among the ten best QBs of all-time.However, I don't put Brady anywhere near Brett Favre's class ... not yet at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Brady shouldn't be in the top 10. No way in Hell. If Peyton Manning had half the team(and scheme, and willingness to cheat) that Brady has, he'd have seven rings by now. Hell, that goes for several other quarterbacks in the league right now. Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Brett Favre; just to name a few off the top of my head.As you can tell, I never punched my ticket to the Brady Bandwagon.Brady is better than every QB you mentioned in your rant. He's one of the all-time greats. Deal with it. And as I have mentioned before, I am no fan of Boston sports but facts are facts.Before 2007, I probably wouldn't have put Tom Brady in my Top 10 since his regular season numbers weren't exactly spectacular. But after the sick numbers he put up last year and leading the Pats to an undefeated regular season, you almost have to include him among the ten best QBs of all-time.However, I don't put Brady anywhere near Brett Favre's class ... not yet at least.Well, I guess it comes down to this: Who would you take in a winner-take-all situation? Brady right now, or Favre when he was winning 3 straight MVPs?I'd honestly take Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted August 9, 2008 Author Share Posted August 9, 2008 Brady shouldn't be in the top 10. No way in Hell. If Peyton Manning had half the team(and scheme, and willingness to cheat) that Brady has, he'd have seven rings by now. Hell, that goes for several other quarterbacks in the league right now. Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Brett Favre; just to name a few off the top of my head.As you can tell, I never punched my ticket to the Brady Bandwagon.Brady is better than every QB you mentioned in your rant. He's one of the all-time greats. Deal with it. And as I have mentioned before, I am no fan of Boston sports but facts are facts.Before 2007, I probably wouldn't have put Tom Brady in my Top 10 since his regular season numbers weren't exactly spectacular. But after the sick numbers he put up last year and leading the Pats to an undefeated regular season, you almost have to include him among the ten best QBs of all-time.However, I don't put Brady anywhere near Brett Favre's class ... not yet at least.Well, I guess it comes down to this: Who would you take in a winner-take-all situation? Brady right now, or Favre when he was winning 3 straight MVPs?I'd honestly take Brady.It's hard to say because Brett Favre never had the weapons on offense that Brady and the Patriots currently possess. Just imagine the insane numbers Favre would have put up in the mid-late 90s if he had a player the caliber of Randy Moss playing on his team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBTV Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 There is no way anyone of sound mind and body can say that they'd take Favre over Brady in a one-game winner-take-all situation. I'm not a Brady mark by any stretch of the imagination, but to suggest that all other things being equal, and considering this is 2008, that you'd take Favre, is borderline lunacy. "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted August 9, 2008 Author Share Posted August 9, 2008 There is no way anyone of sound mind and body can say that they'd take Favre over Brady in a one-game winner-take-all situation. I'm not a Brady mark by any stretch of the imagination, but to suggest that all other things being equal, and considering this is 2008, that you'd take Favre, is borderline lunacy.I assumed TOFA was talking about Tom Brady of today vs. Brett Favre in his prime, not present-day Favre.If you're talking 2008, you have to go with Brady, no doubt. I'm not that biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 The Giants beat both.I'll take Eli, thank you.:-P Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted August 9, 2008 Author Share Posted August 9, 2008 Next week, he returns to action...Mangini names Favre as Jets' starter against Washington Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigga Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Favre in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 1-1Brady in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 3-0Brady in SB with "stellar" supporting cast: 0-1Just sayin' On January 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, NJTank said: Btw this is old hat for Notre Dame. Knits Rockne made up George Tip's death bed speech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Favre in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 1-1Brady in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 3-0Brady in SB with "stellar" supporting cast: 0-1Just sayin'Trent Dilfer in Super Bowl with no offense: 1-0.Trent Dilfer's Super Bowl winning percentage: 1.000GOAT. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEAD! Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Favre in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 1-1Brady in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 3-0Brady in SB with "stellar" supporting cast: 0-1Just sayin'Trent Dilfer in Super Bowl with no offense: 1-0.Trent Dilfer's Super Bowl winning percentage: 1.000GOAT.I think Brad Johnson might challenge Dilfer for that title .... though Johnson probably had a better offence I saw, I came, I left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseballking99 Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 The way i look at this is that Favre has better skills. The things he could do on the field are superior to Brady, so if I had to take one of them for my team I would pick Favre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 Favre in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 1-1Brady in SB with "mediocre" supporting cast: 3-0Brady in SB with "stellar" supporting cast: 0-1Just sayin'Trent Dilfer in Super Bowl with no offense: 1-0.Trent Dilfer's Super Bowl winning percentage: 1.000GOAT.I think Brad Johnson might challenge Dilfer for that title .... though Johnson probably had a better offenceNow of course I'd be the one to jump in on this one That Tampa team's offense was FAR superior to Baltimore's. They had Keyshawn, McCardell, Alstott, Dilger, Pittman...... I'm stretching now, but you get the point But I'm also of the feeling that the defense was a bit better than the Ravens as well (yeah, stretch, whatever). Therefore, 02 Bucs > 00 Ravens God I can't wait for football. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 But I'm also of the feeling that the defense was a bit better than the Ravens as well (yeah, stretch, whatever). Therefore, 02 Bucs > 00 Ravens lol. Of course you would say their defense was better than the 00 Ravens.But IIRC, the Ravens went 5 weeks without scoring a touchdown, and somehow managed to win 2 of those games. Any other team in history would've went o-fer during that period. That is redamndiclous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quantum Posted August 9, 2008 Share Posted August 9, 2008 FWIW, Green Bay's CBS station received permission to air eight Jets games this season. "One of my concerns is shysters show up and take advantage of people's good will and generosity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.