Krz Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Pretty much all of the NBA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost_limey Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 The Kansas City McDonald's Chiefs always look in need of an overhaul to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 7 minutes ago, lost_limey said: The Kansas City McDonald's Chiefs always look in need of an overhaul to me. Where's the dislike button? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 On June 16, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Michael Bolton said: Came into this thread expecting a dozen "Miami Marlins" replies. Was pleased this wasn't the case. I might not love everything about the Marlins' identity, but they do have a cohesive one. Worlds better than the Padres or Brewers, who each have a single good look and whole locker room of bad looks right now, resulting in a conflicted, cluttered mess. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harmening Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 21 hours ago, Mitch B said: NFL: San Diego Chargers NBA: LA Clippers, OKC Thunder, Utah Jazz MLB: San Diego Padres, TB Rays NHL: Vancouver Canucks International Soccer: Team USA Chargers?? To me, that identity seems pretty strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven919 Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Have to agree on US soccer. They basically let Nike do whatever they want. Would love it if team USA settled for red and white hoops with navy blue shorts. That would be a great, unique look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 I don't get all the hate for the Canucks identity. Their colour scheme alone should exclude them from this conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgundy Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Brooklyn Nets. Everything about them says, "Generic basketball team from Brooklyn." I don't even know why they bothered keeping the Nets nickname, which has always been a dumb name anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch B Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 3 hours ago, Harmening said: Chargers?? To me, that identity seems pretty strong. Are they a navy team or a powder blue team? The white helmet looks good with the powder blue uniforms, but it looks quite boring with navy uniforms. The combining of eras for one uniform doesn't work for me. "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." Dennis Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 51 minutes ago, burgundy said: Brooklyn Nets. Everything about them says, "Generic basketball team from Brooklyn." I don't even know why they bothered keeping the Nets nickname, which has always been a dumb name anyways. The stupid name is the only problem - the set is otherwise excellent. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harmening Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Mitch B said: Are they a navy team or a powder blue team? The white helmet looks good with the powder blue uniforms, but it looks quite boring with navy uniforms. The combining of eras for one uniform doesn't work for me. I see what you're saying. Understood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted June 20, 2016 Author Share Posted June 20, 2016 The New Jersey Nets had a great identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandMooreArt Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 10 hours ago, lost_limey said: The Kansas City McDonald's Chiefs always look in need of an overhaul to me. thats an interesting one for me. i actually think they have a very good identity, its just boring to me. i just dont like it GRAPHIC ARTIST BEHANCE / MEDIUM / DRIBBBLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29texan Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 NFL: Bucs NBA: Clippers, Thunder, Nets MLB: Diamondbacks (although their current color scheme has potential...), Marlins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikWings Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 On 6/18/2016 at 4:32 PM, llfhockey said: The new panthers logo? Yes. I don't like it. Too soccer crest-y and works better as a secondary/shoulder patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The Clippers are so far ahead of everyone else it's not even close. It's the perfect mix of a bad colour scheme, a "past its best-by date" trend, a terrible logo set, and just plain laziness. The rest of the "big four," just for shiggles. NHL- Carolina Hurricanes. Their identity just compounds on the badness. Trying too hard to look like an Original Six team? Check. Mismatched home, road, and alternate looks? Check. Bad logo? Check. Every other badly dressed NHL team has at least something working for them in comparison to the Hurricanes. MLB- San Diego Padres. The Milwaukee Brewers are approaching them in terms of an identity being an overall mess, but at least we can all broadly agree what the Brewers' colours are. Ask yourself. What are the San Diego Padres' team colours? It's not an easy answer is it? Which is the first sign that the identity is a mess. NFL- It's a tie between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Jacksonville Jaguars. The Cleveland Browns are right up there, but their use of contrast stitching, NCAA-sized chest wordmarks, and pants stripe wordmarks come off as downright dignified compared to the Bucs' oversized helmet logo and alarm clock numbers, or the Jags' half-and-half helmets. The Miami Dolphins are the best-dressed NFL team in Florida, and almost everyone agrees they suck too. It's just more of a subdued suckage compared to the Bucs and Jags, who loudly proclaim their awfulness. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 15 hours ago, Mitch B said: Are they a navy team or a powder blue team? The white helmet looks good with the powder blue uniforms, but it looks quite boring with navy uniforms. The combining of eras for one uniform doesn't work for me. I get that, and I for one wish they'd use powder blue full-time with navy as just an accent...however, the "lightning bolt" logo has been a strong and consistent identity in all its forms throughout the team's history. I feel like a lot of people are interpreting "identity" to mean "uniforms," which is fine, everyone will interpret things differently...but to me, a big part of "identity" has to do with whether or not a team's logos represent the nickname well and...I dunno, maybe whether the fan base is united in its love for said logos? I'm not a Chargers fan by a long shot but I love their logo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 7 hours ago, Ice_Cap said: NHL- Carolina Hurricanes. Their identity just compounds on the badness. Trying too hard to look like an Original Six team? Check. Mismatched home, road, and alternate looks? Check. Bad logo? Check. Every other badly dressed NHL team has at least something working for them in comparison to the Hurricanes. Agreed. From their inception to 2013, they had something special and unique. Now they have the distinction of having something simultaneously bland and a complete cluster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobster Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 The Clippers are just terrible. And the old logo should be colored like this - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch B Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 22 hours ago, MCM0313 said: I get that, and I for one wish they'd use powder blue full-time with navy as just an accent...however, the "lightning bolt" logo has been a strong and consistent identity in all its forms throughout the team's history. I feel like a lot of people are interpreting "identity" to mean "uniforms," which is fine, everyone will interpret things differently...but to me, a big part of "identity" has to do with whether or not a team's logos represent the nickname well and...I dunno, maybe whether the fan base is united in its love for said logos? I'm not a Chargers fan by a long shot but I love their logo... For me, the Chargers' logo gets lost amidst the two shades of blue. Perhaps they should make the bolts bigger or more pronounced. "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." Dennis Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.