Jump to content

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, McCall said:

Are we building a parking lot, too?

 

We tried that once, but it ended with the 'Yotes skating on the frozen blood of the non believers.

  • Like 1
  • LOL 1

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BBTV said:

If they can be used to make bridges, is there any reason why the actual stadium couldn't be made of lava and dildos?  Acquiring and safely transporting lava might be extremally costly - I'm not sure, it's been years since I've tried.  But the dildo part should be reasonably cost-effective, and they come in enough shapes, sizes, and colors to be used in a variety of structural applications.  Thinking outside the box here, but could LavaDildo Park be the new home of the Rays in 2028?

I think one of those World Cup venues in Qatar was made out of dildos, but they took it down so fast we may never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I :censored:ed a girl from Missouri last night. She had a C-section scar on her butt cheek.

 

On 2/28/2023 at 9:46 AM, DG_ThenNowForever said:

I've spent some time in Tampa/St. Pete and all I remember is you have to drive for everything. Quick grocery store run? Nope -- 25 minutes, at least. Run to the pharmacy? 25 minutes. Go to dinner? Half an hour. See baseball? An hour.

 

Sitting in your car for long stretches of time is part of the culture in that part of the world. I don't understand why it's okay to take 45 minutes to get to a titty bar but not a baseball game.

 

Unrelated question: would a baseball stadium next to Raymond James fare better?

 

The area around RayJay is a dump, unless you like titty bars, car dealerships, and Hooters. It's fine for NFL/Sundays, but you don't want an every day team there.

 

On 2/28/2023 at 11:58 AM, McCall said:

 

Actually it started with his opinion that the Rays should be contracted due to the stadium and my rebuttal that they're a good on-field team, so relocation would make more sense, wherever it may be. The "way he was going about it" went so far into the realm of ridiculousness that the general discussion between relocation outside or inside of Tampa Bay/contraction got muddied to hell.

 

Noooooo we can't lose a team that's really good at winning 88 games a year with no money!

 

Merge them with the Pirates or something, then. Put that scouting and front office brainpower somewhere it will be appreciated, instead of whatever pet motel's been running things in Pittsburgh for the last three decades. The Pirates have their single-A team and run spring training out of Bradenton anyway, which is just a bridge drive aw- oh never mind.

 

On 2/28/2023 at 1:36 PM, tp49 said:

No one seems to remember either that Candlestick was difficult to access outside of the 101 and an express bus from downtown.  They had attendance issues as well.  Giants attendance didn't surge until Pac Bell was built in a more accessible location.

 

Decent point, but Pac Bell itself is a scenic tourist attraction that can't exist anywhere around here, unless you have a weather machine to make the weather not miserable during the PM hours in July, August, and September.

  • LOL 1
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, with this thread's new title, I think that it would be a smart idea to merge the Tampa Bay Rays: Escape from the Trop thread (whose last post, IIRC, was during the lockout-affected 2021-22 MLB offseason) into this thread, if that has not been done already.

 

Second, am I the only one who thinks that the biggest (if not only) reason why neither the Oakland Athletics nor the Tampa Bay Rays have been contracted out of existence might be actually the same reason why neither team has garnered a new ballpark in its respective current territory, moved to another market, or been sold by its respective present ownership?  Please bear with me on this:

  • Chances are that John Fisher et al. have been asking for too much from any and all governments across Oakland's part of the San Francisco Bay Area with regard to bringing forth a new ballpark for the A's and, likewise, Stuart Sternberg et al. have been asking for too much from any and all governments throughout the Tampa Bay region when it comes to securing a new home venue for the Rays.
  • Chances are that another reason why the A's remain at the Coliseum and the Rays keep playing at the Trop is because their respective ownership groups have been asking for too much from politicians and/or businesspeople in other markets when either team's ownership has explored a relocation seriously and/or powerful figures in a given metro area have tried strongly to sway an existing MLB franchise to move to their region.  For the A's, possible evidence of such a situation can be found in the seemingly frequent changes that Fisher and his lieutenants have been making to the team's apparent "Plan B" of a move to the Las Vegas area.  For the Rays, the likely evidence is that the team's only serious relocation threat in recent memory was that controversial (and, IMO, utterly foolish) proposal to split home games between the Tampa Bay and Montréal areas each season, and Sternberg and his partners ended up abandoning that idea relatively quietly during the negotiations for the current collective bargaining agreement between MLB and the MLB Players' Association.
  • While lots of MLB fans have spent years wishing that the A's and/or Rays would gain new ownership, chances are that both teams' current principal owners have been asking for too much money from any and all serious would-be buyers of either franchise.
  • Finally, chances are that both the A's and the Rays still exist because their respective ownerships have been asking for too much money from all of the other MLB clubs and/or from the MLB commissioner's office to shut down those teams, surrender their franchises, and let all of their players with extant contracts (including minor-league players) be taken by MLB's surviving clubs in a dispersal draft.  As I see it, had the A's and/or the Rays been owned by people willing to let the team(s) succumb to contraction on terms that were and are undoubtedly financially reasonable to the rest of "the Lodge" of MLB, the negotiations for the now-current CBA with the MLBPA would have included -- and the MLBPA may have even accepted -- language that would have allowed a reduction of MLB teams and MiLB affiliates thereof in exchange for the rosters of the remaining MLB clubs and their farm teams expanding enough to take in all of the players that the contraction had displaced.

 

Whether or not any of us likes it, I suspect that the only way that John Fisher, Stuart Sternberg, and their respective co-investors will ever be humble enough to steer themselves and their teams away from their existing states of affairs is if they all lose so much money that they absolutely must make earnest compromises on stadium deals (whether in their teams' existing territories or elsewhere) due to a clear and basic lack of leverage and/or find themselves under genuine financial pressures either to sell their franchises for sane prices or to take monetarily rational buyout offers from the rest of the MLB "Lodge" to cause the A's and the Rays to become things of the past.  Thus, anyone and everyone wanting to upend the status quo for both the A's and the Rays has the burden of needing to boycott Fisher, Sternberg, and their respective co-owners whenever and however possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, who do you think said:

I :censored:ed a girl from Missouri last night. She had a C-section scar on her butt cheek.

 

 

I didn't think it would be possible for a thread to go downhill from an extended discussion about the structural integrity of dildos, but it did!

  • Like 2
  • LOL 1
1 hour ago, BringBackTheVet said:

sorry sweetie, but I don't suck minor-league d

CCSLC Post of the day September 3rd 2012

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, McCall said:

Dildo? Dildon't.

 

You may laugh, but my boss still tells the story of when he was about 70 years old and the term came up in writing during a divorce case . . . and he and the similarly aged male judge both thought the word was pronounced "DILL-doo".

  • LOL 2

Most Liked Content of the Day -- February 15, 2017, August 21, 2017, August 22, 2017     /////      Proud Winner of the CCSLC Post of the Day Award -- April 8, 2008

Originator of the Upside Down Sarcasm Smilie -- November 1, 2005  🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, gosioux76 said:

"As your governor, I plan to make sure no taxpayer has to foot the bill for another dildo bridge ever again! I can't be bought by the dildo lobby!"

You mean Big Dildo?

  • LOL 1

Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse."

 

BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD

POTD (Shared)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

See, with rising sea levels and all that, I wonder about the ability of any dildo-based structure to withstand flooding from the storm surge of any given hurricane. Unless we can redirect the lava flow into the sea with a strategically collapsed building ala the 1997 Tommy Lee Jones classic Volcano and use the natural processes of the water cooling the lava into rock to actually build more land.

 

The ability of dildos to withstand hurricane-force winds is still a mystery, though.

 

Pittsburgh Arsenal - Elite Football League (NFL) - est. 2006 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, maz said:

 

See, with rising sea levels and all that, I wonder about the ability of any dildo-based structure to withstand flooding from the storm surge of any given hurricane. Unless we can redirect the lava flow into the sea with a strategically collapsed building ala the 1997 Tommy Lee Jones classic Volcano and use the natural processes of the water cooling the lava into rock to actually build more land.

 

The ability of dildos to withstand hurricane-force winds is still a mystery, though.

 

Flex Seal.  You haven't seen their new commercial have you?

  • Like 1
  • WOAH 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Floating stadium in the middle of the bay. Unanchored so it's constantly moving and bumping into the shore, bridges, and other boats, which would make for everchanging wind and sun angles. You have to take a boat just to get to it. 

  • Like 3

PvO6ZWJ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Sport said:

Floating stadium in the middle of the bay. Unanchored so it's constantly moving and bumping into the shore, bridges, and other boats, which would make for everchanging wind and sun angles. You have to take a boat just to get to it. 

No lava? No dildos? Dude, GTFO if you're not gonna take this thread seriously.

  • Like 2
  • LOL 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presumably that while the Dodgers and Angels share Southern California (with San Diego County being the Padres' sad little fiefdom), the Giants would now have the entirety of Northern California to themselves. For the Bay/Sacramento/Reno to become a one-team territory would indeed disrupt the balance of things, especially if the Las Vegas A's were to further cut into Dodgers/Angels territory.

  • Like 3

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.