Gothamite Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Points for the Nixon reference, but even relatively clever drivel is still drivel. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Those are nice, but I much prefer the Warren Moon era uniforms. Those are perfect.I'll put my vote in for a different iteration - the silver helmet days.Although the Moon set was pretty great, too.Agreed. That helmet is fantastic. Looked like the steel oilfield roughneck helmets of the 1960s too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Aesthetically I like the silver Oilers helmets, but something about them screams "Dallas Cowboys Light." PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewharrington Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I don't really get the love for those Oilers throwbacks. The pre-Titans Warren Moon set are better, in my opinion.I think each set has it's merits. The blue helmet shell and round numerals are great, and unique. The Moon-era set did look a little 'basic 1980s football uniform' at times (much like the Kelly-era Bills' uniform). I think a few elements from each set could make a great one. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgofnature Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I heard the browns are going to return to this look for away games since they will be wearing white on white at home this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I heard the browns are going to return to this look for away games since they will be wearing white on white at home this seasonAnd for the 3894th time, this thread has become the unofficial home of the Cleveland Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I heard the browns are going to return to this look for away games since they will be wearing white on white at home this seasonLegit source (not a staff writer from clevelandbrowns.com)? JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejeff Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 That's the biggest high-school football stadium I've ever seen.Yeah no offense ART, but I was thinking the same thing! I know the camera must be on panoramic or wide but it does look quite small!No offense to either of you, but it is the 10th-largest stadium in the NFL. Really the only perceptions of the stadium being small are when you're outside of the seating bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Yeah, isn't Ralph Wilson Stadium pretty deep in the ground? Stadium, I said. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scraw28 Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 I heard the browns are going to return to this look for away games since they will be wearing white on white at home this seasonLegit source (not a staff writer from clevelandbrowns.com)?prove it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTnSocal Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No offense to either of you, but it is the 10th-largest stadium in the NFL. Really the only perceptions of the stadium being small are when you're outside of the seating bowl.No Jeff .... It's the 6th largest of the 31 NFL stadiumsI heard the browns are going to return to this look for away games since they will be wearing white on white at home this seasonWhy would a team nicknamed the 'Browns' wear white on white uniforms at home? There'll be more orange as the secondary color than brown. I like their brown jersey / white pants look ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Brown jersey / orange pants at home and white jersey / brown pants (with stripes) on the road would be the ideal look. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Brown jersey / orange pants at home and white jersey / brown pants (WITHOUT stripes) on the road would be the ideal look.DUH!!! haha JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, the brown pants need stripes. It makes no sense to have two striped pairs of pants and one non-striped pair. All they'd have to do is take their usual pants stripe and color it white/orange/white to match the pattern on the brown jersey. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, the brown pants need stripes. It makes no sense to have two striped pairs of pants and one non-striped pair. All they'd have to do is take their usual pants stripe and color it white/orange/white to match the pattern on the brown jersey.Ravens have one striped, one non-striped. It depends on the colors. A solid brown pant really brings out the stripes on a white jersey and white striped socks. Looks amazing in person. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, the brown pants need stripes. It makes no sense to have two striped pairs of pants and one non-striped pair. All they'd have to do is take their usual pants stripe and color it white/orange/white to match the pattern on the brown jersey.Ravens have one striped, one non-striped.I would never hold the Ravens up as an example of "what to do" in the uniform department. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, the brown pants need stripes. It makes no sense to have two striped pairs of pants and one non-striped pair. All they'd have to do is take their usual pants stripe and color it white/orange/white to match the pattern on the brown jersey.Ravens have one striped, one non-striped.I would never hold the Ravens up as an example of "what to do" in the uniform department.100% agree, but take the white Ravens' jersey with their sold black pants and combine them with a striped sock instead of their solid colored socks and it's a great uniform. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lights Out Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, the brown pants need stripes. It makes no sense to have two striped pairs of pants and one non-striped pair. All they'd have to do is take their usual pants stripe and color it white/orange/white to match the pattern on the brown jersey.Ravens have one striped, one non-striped.I would never hold the Ravens up as an example of "what to do" in the uniform department.Agreed. The Ravens started off with a great set in 1996 and it has progressively deteriorated from there. POTD: 2/4/12 3/4/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintsfan Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, the brown pants need stripes. It makes no sense to have two striped pairs of pants and one non-striped pair. All they'd have to do is take their usual pants stripe and color it white/orange/white to match the pattern on the brown jersey.Ravens have one striped, one non-striped.I would never hold the Ravens up as an example of "what to do" in the uniform department.Agreed. The Ravens started off with a great set in 1996 and it has progressively deteriorated from there.No no no! The purple and black monstrosities from year 1 were awful. Truly bad color combination. The helmet logos have improved too. In general the Ravens have improved, not got good, but improved! 2011/12 WFL Champions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnySeoul Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Horrible uniform set. The Texas Longhorns are a perfect example that teams do not always have to have stripes on the pants. When done right (i.e. Longhorns, Browns) it looks damn good. JohnnySeoul's WikipageIF ONE IS CONSIDERED RACIST, THEN BOTH MUST BE CONSIDERED RACIST.BOTTOM LINE: NEITHER ONE IS RACIST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.