JPDesign Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Old uniforms that didn't have gradient numbers were better. There's no pants stripes on these, and the font is worse. Love the front facing logo though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracy MidGrady Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Old uniforms that didn't have gradient numbers were better. There's no pants stripes on these, and the font is worse. Love the front facing logo though.There is pants stripes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clintau24 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 They said last year that the anthracite was all gone then. Glad it stayed gone "I believe in Auburn and love it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorback447 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Much better stripes too than the ones on the last set that fit awkwardly with the razorhawk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GriffinM6 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Old uniforms that didn't have gradient numbers were better. There's no pants stripes on these, and the font is worse. Love the front facing logo though.Old uniforms that didn't have gradient numbers were better. There's no pants stripes on these, and the font is worse. Love the front facing logo though.There is pants stripesYeah I said that before I looked through the full unveiling. Anyway, still don't like these that much. I'd take the pants, but use the jerseys from last instead. They were more than just a "fill in the panel" uniform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejblee Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Am I the only one who really likes these? Falcons. UGA. Hawks. Braves. Tottenham Hotspur. Atlanta United Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clintau24 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Am I the only one who really likes these? Believe soHonestly, I'm just tired of Nike's uninspired (even if they try to fight that) uniforms this past week. Each uniform set has looked pretty much the same. Shoulder caps all around, stupid number fonts for everyone, and just the easy way out. Nothing is extremely bad, except for Syracuse, but nothing is very good either. Nothing has made me say "Wow! Now that's a good looking uniform!" I just keep thinking "Shame Nike, we know you can do better." "I believe in Auburn and love it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Am I the only one who really likes these? I love these.I'm surprised by the reaction, I thought everybody was going to call the look an upgrade but what I found was a lot of hate. Which really shocked me because of how nice and traditional the uniforms are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorback447 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 They're getting an extremely positive response amongst our fan base on twitter and message boards. Most I've seen consider it an upgrade. The only unanimous complaint I've seen is the baseball uniform. That font looks pretty terrible on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracy MidGrady Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 They're getting an extremely positive response amongst our fan base on twitter and message boards. Most I've seen consider it an upgrade. The only unanimous complaint I've seen is the baseball uniform. That font looks pretty terrible on it.As long the fans and recruits like them that's what's important I would prefer the new pants with last years jerseys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorback447 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 They definitely would have paired better with last years uniforms than the Michigan St stripe that we had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 These aren't bad, they're just SO boring. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRicSlick Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 These aren't bad, they're just SO boring. The one time people get a boring uniform, they complain. Yet when Nike unveiled modern uniforms people complain that it's so ugly and want to go back to the "golden age of CF uniforms". People just can't be pleased! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangefaniniowa Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Right now I have to say Arkansas has moved ahead of Washington as far as new Nike unis are concerned. The Razorback unis look sharp!! Great job Nike. At least some schools know how to look right and Arkansas look is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFB Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Yay, more Agency numerals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxColonels Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Am I the only one who really likes these?Nope. I think they look pretty nice. Arkansas, to me, has always looked best with a simple, clean uni set. This is conservatively modern. The only thing that I think they could change would be the white tribute to the University of Washington stadium on the chest. Also, I'm surprised at the head-on logo. I like that as well. Didn't think I would. And I like the font. Call me crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 the Washington uniform is done well enough. the white helmet texture is interesting, give them and HGI points for doing something new. but how full of is Nike? i mean really, "we filled in this little mesh panel to reflect the stands of the stadium" GTFO. thats about the laziest, most BS explanation of a graphic idea i've ever heard. i do like the aesthetic look of the gold-cornered numbers (good job on keeping that number font. the roundness adds a good variety of shape to the whole set) but the idea behind it isn't very good either. and not just because Oregon is the clear "owner" of the northwest but that it really only works if you have a long history of competitive dominance in the area or you're the only one in that area. it doesn't fit Washington at all and i'm kind of embarrassed for them because of it. Historically UW as a program is far superior in comparison to Oregon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmac Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 They talk about consistency yet they still use the weird inverse hog logo on the white helmets? I wish they would modernize the hog logo just enough that it could be used consistently on any background, rather than this stupid inverse color nonsense. https://www.behance.net/bmatukewic8043 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MellowTheMyth Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I was expecting something a bit more bold for Arkansas, but it isn't bad. I've noticed lately that the latest Nike unveils, the majority of the uniforms don't have TV numbers on the shoulders or sleeves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hailstateunis Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 I love it. New logo is great, football uniform has a good mix of modern and classic. I actually like the new wordmark; it's very similar to the Jaguars.And apparently contrary to everyone else, my favorite part of the rebrand is the baseball uniforms. Way better than the old ones. http://www.hailstateunis.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.