Jump to content

Players who look BETTER or WORSE after a number change


Recommended Posts

I think Ray Bourque's switch from 7 to 77 was an upgrade.

 

18009.jpg

 

bourque-esposito.jpg

 

So was Paul Coffey's.

 

coffeypauledm005.jpg

 

cut.jpg

 

Interestingly, 1987-88 was a huge season for 77s in the NHL--Bourque and Coffey both switched to 77 that year and were joined by Sabres rookie Pierre Turgeon wearing the number. Prior to that year, 77 was a rare number in the NHL. One of the earlier wearers of 77 was Phil Esposito, whose switch from 7 to 77 ironically seems like more of a downgrade.

 

e6a07fee991c2136fa51ffa3ba17b9f8.jpg

 

EspositoRangers.jpg

 

Visit my store on REDBUBBLE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Edit: Ha! Somone already posted Matt Cain already lmao. Let me edit to show Bruce Bochy. I know, I know he's not a "player" but it was interesting in 2011 he switched his number to accomodate Carlos Beltran's number 15 even though he was a trade rental. 

 

72RTVZ9.jpg

85mV8kx.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Chello said:

Edit: Ha! Somone already posted Matt Cain already lmao. Let me edit to show Bruce Bochy. I know, I know he's not a "player" but it was interesting in 2011 he switched his number to accomodate Carlos Beltran's number 15 even though he was a trade rental. 

 

72RTVZ9.jpg

85mV8kx.jpg

 

 

 

Didn’t Don Mattingly do the same when the Dodgers acquired Shane Victorino? Changing from 8 to 88?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easily Josh Gordon

 

From 13 to 12 is an upgrade 

20121209_jla_ar7_107.0.jpg

AP_637798683330.jpg

But from 12 to 10 is a downgrade not

gordon.jpg

necessarily because 10 is a bad WR number i actually like it a bit better than 12 but because Gordon already committed to 12 and probably feels silly now

Photo3.png

Another downgrade would be AB from 84 to 17. He’s just owned 84 for so long it was really strange seeing him in 17 which i already hate the look of 17 already. It just strangely enough doesn’t fit his frame at all despite being sleeker than 84

antonio-brown-patriots.jpg

Last one is Chubb as an upgrade going from 31 in the preseason to 24 which looks much better though i still consider 24 as a DB number than a RB one

usatsi_11128635-e1535234217954.jpg?w=100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Rusty Staub preferred number 10, which he had worn with Houston and Montreal. But in his first stint with the Mets he wore number 4, as number 10 was taken.  He reverted to number 10 upon his return to the Mets.  But I preferred him in number 4.

 

Image result for rusty staub 1973   Image result for rusty staub 1981

 

 

An oddity is that Staub made a brief return to the Expos before he came back to the Mets.  But by that time number 10 had already been claimed by Andre Dawson, so Staub wore number 6.  I think that even that number looked better on him than his preferred number 10.

 

 

Image result for rusty staub 1979 expos    Image result for rusty staub 1979 expos

 

 

P.S. - I love those red front numbers!  The Expos had that feature at home for 1979 only.

logo-diamonds-for-CC-no-photo-sig.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After (finally) watching the Dennis Rodman 30 for 30 last week, I felt like he's a great candidate for this thread.

 

#10 suited Rodman fine in Detroit and San Antonio.

 

9b6b87ac1973f983272137cd4695c4ec.jpg

 

#91 was a perfect choice for Chicago. By then, he'd become the outsized personality that he was and wearing a weird number just made sense.

 

511E8JEMEEL.jpg

 

...but #70 in Dallas and #73 in LA just seemed odd for the sake of being odd.

 

 2ar6uOoazJHHp1k-owoZ3HSHZDglfs6_-XryzYBLPjc.jpg?auto=webp&s=dbbbd2f06fdd3bff55aadda5cff9a13a85ecea32 dennis_rodman.jpg

 

91 > 10 > 70/73.

BigStuffChamps3_zps00980734.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2019 at 5:11 PM, DNAsports said:

Just like his career, Carmelo Anthony’s jersey number only gets worse as time goes on:

 

spacer.png

I think in hindsight, 7 was not bad for a number change. I do wonder how Blazers fans would feel if he went with 7 considering Brandon Roy's tenure from the late 2000s/early 2010s

Ihmgl03.pngVZ6sbGD.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m so glad there’s a thread for this and I’m not crazy for being the only one who thinks about stuff like this. 
 

First player that came to my mind was Marlon Humphrey. I thought 29 suited him very well:

spacer.png

 

but it’s Earl Thomas’ signature number, so he switched it up this season to 44. And dang it if it’s not perfect for him. 
spacer.png

 

I definitely think of DBs having numbers in the 20’s, but I like when stars branch out and carve their own niche. 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Crabcake47 said:

I’m so glad there’s a thread for this and I’m not crazy for being the only one who thinks about stuff like this. 
 

First player that came to my mind was Marlon Humphrey. I thought 29 suited him very well:

spacer.png

 

but it’s Earl Thomas’ signature number, so he switched it up this season to 44. And dang it if it’s not perfect for him. 
spacer.png

 

I definitely think of DBs having numbers in the 20’s, but I like when stars branch out and carve their own niche. 

At first I wasn’t too sure about Mark Ingram wearing 21, but I think it works for him better than 22:

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank Gore is a curious case of looking good in any number he wore. Initially I was on the side of 21 being his worst number choice, but the longer I looked at pictures the more I liked all the numbers:


49ers

spacer.png

 

Colts

spacer.png

 

Dolphins

spacer.png

 

Bills

spacer.png
 

While looking at Buffalo Gore photos, it appears he wore 28 as well for a short time. Presumably this preseason:

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Has Devin Hester been mentioned?

 

This is how most remember him...

 

USATSI_7608239.jpg

 

But then he ended up going to Atlanta, and...that 17 was not working for him:

 

USATSI_9012256_168380823_lowres.jpg

 

I wasn't even aware this happened, but sure enough, it did:

 

602992440.0.jpeg

 

And then, as his final hurrah, he returned to 17....

 

0ap3000000774536.jpg

 

23 will always be Devin Hester to me.

*Disclaimer: I am not an authoritative expert on stuff...I just do a lot of reading and research and keep in close connect with a bunch of people who are authoritative experts on stuff. 😁

|| dribbble || Behance ||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Buc said:

Has Devin Hester been mentioned?

 

This is how most remember him...

 

But then he ended up going to Atlanta, and...that 17 was not working for him:

 

I wasn't even aware this happened, but sure enough, it did:

 

And then, as his final hurrah, he returned to 17....

 

23 will always be Devin Hester to me.

 

You probably already know this but just as a sidenote, he was essentially "grandfathered" in when in Chicago since he started as a CB then transferred to WR, but once you go to a new team those positional number rules kick in. He no doubt would've like to have kept 23 at all those other stops. I would say in that situation, given his status/accomplishments, let him keep 23 as an exclusion to the rules, but obviously that's subjective and would open Pandora's box.

Facebook: CustomSportsCovers Twitter: CSCovers

Quote

No because when the Irish came to Ireland and first came in contact with the leprechaun people, they didn't take their land away and force them to move west. Instead, the two groups learned to assimilate peacefully. However, certain tribes of the leprechaun refused to taint the pure blood and moved north into the forests of Ireland, only to be seen rarely, usually at the same time of a rainbows appearance and occasionally at the factories of Lucky Charms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.