Roger Clemente Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 My balls are bigger than those jerseys. Follow me on Twitter if you care: @Animal_Clans.My opinion may or may not be the same as yours. The choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Am A Flaming Douche Bag Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Calgary and Ottawa are the only teams with the :censored:ed up socks right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capn89 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Calgary and Ottawa are the only teams with the :censored:ed up socks right?Tampa Bay too, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliott Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 well after seeing neon's pics...I am NOT getting a new Thrashers jersey.or just buy a bigger size so that it doesn't fit so tightly...something bigger than you usually would.No matter how big you go they'll still have that womanly hourglass shape to them. It looks godawful on a regular dude as opposed to an athlete with pads and junk.Yeah, exactly what I was thinking. Dribbble ... Behance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 My balls are bigger than those jerseys.Good thing they're not pants, then.Also, you may want to have that checked out. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SG30 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Just outta curiosity, if Buffalo had a better logo, meaning not the slug, how would you rate the jerseys?? Personally, I hate the slug, not the jerseys. I actually like the design of them. I personally think that without the slug they'd be in the top half of the league based on jersey not logo design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetropolisPt31 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Sharks new threads officially unveiled here:http://sharks.nhl.com/team/app/?service=pa...;galleryId=2427 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgess Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Just outta curiosity, if Buffalo had a better logo, meaning not the slug, how would you rate the jerseys?? Personally, I hate the slug, not the jerseys. I actually like the design of them. I personally think that without the slug they'd be in the top half of the league based on jersey not logo design.I agree here. The logo is one of the parts of a jersey. People shouldn't give Buffalo immediate 'F' marks just because of the logo on the front. The rest of the jersey's elements should be taken into account as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 So yep, the full-body sharks are on the shoulders. The video screencaps were wrong. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artymous Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Calgary and Ottawa are the only teams with the :censored:ed up socks right?So yep, the full-body sharks are on the shoulders. The video screencaps were wrong.This is why I was so sure it was the full-body shark in the screen-grabs at first until you pointed out they weren't.. It was explained by a source that it would be the full-body shark. Still, it should have been the shoulder fin IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Agreed - as much as I love the full-body shark (I think it should be the primary logo, and should be the chest patch), I'm not sure it's enough of a contrast with the actual primary. The fin patch would have been great.So is it true, then, that the team has pulled the fin logo since they unveiled the new set? Or that they goofed and had a press conference with the wrong logos (and sold merchandise with a rejected logo)? The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capn89 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 From seeing the game shots of these, I really thought they were going to suck but these are actually one of the best jerseys that have come out of thie Edge-abortion. *clap clap* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SG30 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 damn the sharks look SHARP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 I'd tend to agree. Wish my Admirals had gone with something like this. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artymous Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Agreed - as much as I love the full-body shark (I think it should be the primary logo, and should be the chest patch), I'm not sure it's enough of a contrast with the actual primary. The fin patch would have been great.So is it true, then, that the team has pulled the fin logo since they unveiled the new set? Or that they goofed and had a press conference with the wrong logos (and sold merchandise with a rejected logo)?That I *don't* know.. but I do know that you don't see the fin logo on the site at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsfan1 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Agreed - as much as I love the full-body shark (I think it should be the primary logo, and should be the chest patch), I'm not sure it's enough of a contrast with the actual primary. The fin patch would have been great.So is it true, then, that the team has pulled the fin logo since they unveiled the new set? Or that they goofed and had a press conference with the wrong logos (and sold merchandise with a rejected logo)?That I *don't* know.. but I do know that you don't see the fin logo on the site at allThe last place it could be found is on the helmets since we know its not on the shorts either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artymous Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Aha! The fin logo is used for the website's mini-logo on firefox tabs and in the address bar... so it's still an official mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Typical. The Sharks are basically recolored Bruins jerseys, and everyone seems to be nuts for them. What they had last year was far superior than this. At least the old set was unique. This? Boring. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverSports Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 The fin logo is on the helmets, I think I saw it in some of those practice photos someone posted a long time ago that show the shield on the pants, and it was confirmed on the Sharks' site that there are numbers on the front of both sweaters. Shame though, the Sharks had a press conference with players and presumably the numbers and full look, but only showed the sweater online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger77 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 I'd be happier if the new sharks uniforms had the old sharks logos, and the fin of course! PotD May 11th, 2011looooooogodud: June 7th 2010 - July 5th 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.