Jump to content

2010-11 NHL Season Thread


Still MIGHTY

Recommended Posts

Just a horrible decision to start Hiller so soon.

Yeah I wanted to see him back obviously, but I would have held him out until Monday's game against the Avs. Emery and Ellis should have handled the Nashville/Chicago duties. Those games are too big. The Ducks shouldn't be giving points to them, but to the Avs it wouldn't have mattered all that much I guess. Now they need to win in Chicago and Colorado.

I'm baffled by this theory. The guy who is the only reason you are sniffing the playoffs and you want to hold him out another game? That makes no sense. If he's healthy to play, then you play him. Why would you keep a healthy All-Star and possibly Vezina Trophy finalist on the bench when he's healthy. If you didn't think he was healthy enough to play, then why was he activated. Rust my behind. He just had a bad game, move on. But really if you are going to complain about this game and them starting Hiller, then what about all those other games he started and they lost? Hmmm... Hiller got you to where you are, and when he's healthy you put him back in. Ray Emery wouldn't even have a sniff of the NHL if the Ducks didn't have their starter injured and so many crappy goaltenders behind him in the minors. Yeah, he's caught lightening in a bottle, but what would you say if Emery started and got blasted like Hiller? I know what, "They should've started Hiller over Emery, because he's the guy who got us to this point. He's an All-Star." That's exactly what you and all the Duck fans would be saying if Hiller was benched and Emery got lit up.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

7-0 Bruins. Chara with 3 assists. Cue the rioting in Montreal.

hey...we wait for the playoff to riot

Riot when you win, riot when you lose, riot when something happens that they don't like... does Montreal do anything BUT riot?

On September 20, 2012 at 0:50 AM, 'CS85 said:

It's like watching the hellish undead creakily shuffling their way out of the flames of a liposuction clinic dumpster fire.

On February 19, 2012 at 9:30 AM, 'pianoknight said:

Story B: Red Wings go undefeated and score 100 goals in every game. They also beat a team comprised of Godzilla, the ghost of Abraham Lincoln, 2 Power Rangers and Betty White. Oh, and they played in the middle of Iraq on a military base. In the sand. With no ice. Santa gave them special sand-skates that allowed them to play in shorts and t-shirts in 115 degree weather. Jesus, Zeus and Buddha watched from the sidelines and ate cotton candy.

POTD 5/24/12POTD 2/26/17

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a horrible decision to start Hiller so soon.

Yeah I wanted to see him back obviously, but I would have held him out until Monday's game against the Avs. Emery and Ellis should have handled the Nashville/Chicago duties. Those games are too big. The Ducks shouldn't be giving points to them, but to the Avs it wouldn't have mattered all that much I guess. Now they need to win in Chicago and Colorado.

I'm baffled by this theory. The guy who is the only reason you are sniffing the playoffs and you want to hold him out another game? That makes no sense. If he's healthy to play, then you play him. Why would you keep a healthy All-Star and possibly Vezina Trophy finalist on the bench when he's healthy. If you didn't think he was healthy enough to play, then why was he activated. Rust my behind. He just had a bad game, move on. But really if you are going to complain about this game and them starting Hiller, then what about all those other games he started and they lost? Hmmm... Hiller got you to where you are, and when he's healthy you put him back in. Ray Emery wouldn't even have a sniff of the NHL if the Ducks didn't have their starter injured and so many crappy goaltenders behind him in the minors. Yeah, he's caught lightening in a bottle, but what would you say if Emery started and got blasted like Hiller? I know what, "They should've started Hiller over Emery, because he's the guy who got us to this point. He's an All-Star." That's exactly what you and all the Duck fans would be saying if Hiller was benched and Emery got lit up.

You're an idiot. Stop trying to tell other fans about their teams when they watch their own teams' games and you don't. Sure Hiller got them where they are, but you don't start a guy in the biggest game of the season when he hasn't played in forever when your other goalie's been playing well and getting wins for you!

6fQjS3M.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a horrible decision to start Hiller so soon.

Yeah I wanted to see him back obviously, but I would have held him out until Monday's game against the Avs. Emery and Ellis should have handled the Nashville/Chicago duties. Those games are too big. The Ducks shouldn't be giving points to them, but to the Avs it wouldn't have mattered all that much I guess. Now they need to win in Chicago and Colorado.

I'm baffled by this theory. The guy who is the only reason you are sniffing the playoffs and you want to hold him out another game? That makes no sense. If he's healthy to play, then you play him. Why would you keep a healthy All-Star and possibly Vezina Trophy finalist on the bench when he's healthy. If you didn't think he was healthy enough to play, then why was he activated. Rust my behind. He just had a bad game, move on. But really if you are going to complain about this game and them starting Hiller, then what about all those other games he started and they lost? Hmmm... Hiller got you to where you are, and when he's healthy you put him back in. Ray Emery wouldn't even have a sniff of the NHL if the Ducks didn't have their starter injured and so many crappy goaltenders behind him in the minors. Yeah, he's caught lightening in a bottle, but what would you say if Emery started and got blasted like Hiller? I know what, "They should've started Hiller over Emery, because he's the guy who got us to this point. He's an All-Star." That's exactly what you and all the Duck fans would be saying if Hiller was benched and Emery got lit up.

You're an idiot. Stop trying to tell other fans about their teams when they watch their own teams' games and you don't. Sure Hiller got them where they are, but you don't start a guy in the biggest game of the season when he hasn't played in forever when your other goalie's been playing well and getting wins for you!

And especially when he has Vertigo. It's not like a arm injury or something, where you know when your 100%, but with Vertigo, it can come back and be very hard to cope with.

oddball is a dick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, if they can keep this going into the playoffs that would be huge.

Gee, now there's a scoop.

I'm just saying. Because njmeadowlanders said that he's not sure if they were peaking too early, I said it would be huge if they could keep this up instead of faltering and being not hot going into the playoffs.

And Brass97 that post about Lundqvist was him recording his league-leading 11th shutout. Not because he won the game for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a horrible decision to start Hiller so soon.

Yeah I wanted to see him back obviously, but I would have held him out until Monday's game against the Avs. Emery and Ellis should have handled the Nashville/Chicago duties. Those games are too big. The Ducks shouldn't be giving points to them, but to the Avs it wouldn't have mattered all that much I guess. Now they need to win in Chicago and Colorado.

I'm baffled by this theory. The guy who is the only reason you are sniffing the playoffs and you want to hold him out another game? That makes no sense. If he's healthy to play, then you play him. Why would you keep a healthy All-Star and possibly Vezina Trophy finalist on the bench when he's healthy. If you didn't think he was healthy enough to play, then why was he activated. Rust my behind. He just had a bad game, move on. But really if you are going to complain about this game and them starting Hiller, then what about all those other games he started and they lost? Hmmm... Hiller got you to where you are, and when he's healthy you put him back in. Ray Emery wouldn't even have a sniff of the NHL if the Ducks didn't have their starter injured and so many crappy goaltenders behind him in the minors. Yeah, he's caught lightening in a bottle, but what would you say if Emery started and got blasted like Hiller? I know what, "They should've started Hiller over Emery, because he's the guy who got us to this point. He's an All-Star." That's exactly what you and all the Duck fans would be saying if Hiller was benched and Emery got lit up.

You're an idiot. Stop trying to tell other fans about their teams when they watch their own teams' games and you don't. Sure Hiller got them where they are, but you don't start a guy in the biggest game of the season when he hasn't played in forever when your other goalie's been playing well and getting wins for you!

First of all, I would respect you and your opinion if you were mature and did not resort to the childish act of calling people names when you disagree with a post. When you can learn to grow up and respond without childish names, then I'll respect you.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharks get a strong 4-1 win in Glendale and pad their lead in the Pacific.

I got a question for those of you who have been to games in your respective markets in which the Sharks are the opponent. How well does Teal Nation travel?

For obvious reasons there is always a strong Sharks contingent in LA, Anaheim, and Phoenix. However the local media coverage gives us the impression that there is a respectable number of Sharks fans on the road in places like Chicago, St. Louis, Philadelphia, even Detroit, Calgary and Edmonton. So really, how well are the Sharks supported on the road in more "established" hockey markets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rangers are now 27-0-0 when leading after 2. They're the only team to not lose a game at all when doing so...that's phenomenal.

That's amazing, considering how many of them were close games. That just shows what great defense and goaltending the Rangers have been playing late in games this season. If they could score more they'd be a top team. 14th in the NHL isn't bad, but if they were top 10, they's be dominant. Don't wanna be stating the obvious but it is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.