logofan20 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 What are some good colors/names/logos for a possible Los Angeles NFL team, provided whichever team moves there rebrands?Names:Los Angeles GladiatorsLos Angeles MarvelsLos Angeles QuakesLos Angeles Mammoths(La Brea Tar Pits)Los Angeles SentinelsLos Angeles Orcas(whale watching)Los Angeles WavesLos Angeles Avengers(Adopt defunct AFL team name)Los Angeles RockersLos Angeles StarsLos Angeles Riots(Ha) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicageaux Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Los Angeles Jaguars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGooo Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 None of those sound like NFL team names. Whatever team moves their should keep their name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninersdd Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 The Lakers kept their name from Minnesota, so obviously there is precedent there for keeping the name even when it completely doesn't make any sense for LA. (Yeah I know a name like the Jaguars should work anywhere). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kw11333 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 The NFL is a stickler for teams keeping their names when they move. Even Tennessee had to use the "Oilers" name for a season after they moved. They also forced the Cardinals to keep that name the entire time they were in St. Louis, despite the baseball team having that exact name for 60 years prior at that time.It would come full circle if the Rams or Raiders moved to LA though. Really would be no need for a name change anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbadefense1990 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I could dig the LA Avengers in the NFL, playing at Farmers Field, being in the AFC West. For some reason, I can dig all this in the AFC: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyAnna Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 LA Chargers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleuet Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Marvels is fun fun cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chawls Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I like Quakes and Waves, but the Chargers are keeping their name when they relocate to Los Angeles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 The NFL is a stickler for teams keeping their names when they move. Even Tennessee had to use the "Oilers" name for a season after they moved. They also forced the Cardinals to keep that name the entire time they were in St. Louis, despite the baseball team having that exact name for 60 years prior at that time.Got a source for that second part? Because the first part isn't true at all.The Oilers kept their name after the move because Bud Adams didn't want to change it, not because the league forced him to. He was personally fond of the name, and former players asked him not to change it. But after taking a lot of heat from the fans in Tennessee, he finally agreed to adopt a new name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiodrama Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I've always liked the "Los Angeles Legacy." No idea why. No historical meaning or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 - If the Rams, Raiders, or Chargers move to LA, no rebrand is necessary as those names have local significance.- If the Jags go sometime, I think that name could work with new colors and an Aztec style flair. Leave the teal history back in Jax.- Anyone else would be on a case by case basis (Los Angeles 49ers? Maybe. Los Angeles Vikings? )I really like the name Avengers and Sentinels. Legacy is a good one too, but I'm not sure the NFL's keen on singular plural names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 The NFL is a stickler for teams keeping their names when they move. Even Tennessee had to use the "Oilers" name for a season after they moved. They also forced the Cardinals to keep that name the entire time they were in St. Louis, despite the baseball team having that exact name for 60 years prior at that time.Got a source for that second part? Because the first part isn't true at all.The Oilers kept their name after the move because Bud Adams didn't want to change it, not because the league forced him to. He was personally fond of the name, and former players asked him not to change it. But after taking a lot of heat from the fans in Tennessee, he finally agreed to adopt a new name.Plus the Tennessee Oilers were around for two years ('97 and '98), not just one year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 - Anyone else would be on a case by case basis (Los Angeles 49ers? Maybe. Los Angeles Vikings? )I really like the name Avengers and Sentinels. Legacy is a good one too, but I'm not sure the NFL's keen on singular plural names.Sentinels is way too "Replacements". The 49ers are getting a new stadium in the Bay Area...they're likely not going anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDGP Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 The NFL is a stickler for teams keeping their names when they move. Even Tennessee had to use the "Oilers" name for a season after they moved. They also forced the Cardinals to keep that name the entire time they were in St. Louis, despite the baseball team having that exact name for 60 years prior at that time.Got a source for that second part? Because the first part isn't true at all.The Oilers kept their name after the move because Bud Adams didn't want to change it, not because the league forced him to. He was personally fond of the name, and former players asked him not to change it. But after taking a lot of heat from the fans in Tennessee, he finally agreed to adopt a new name.A quick search of the Cardinals wikipedia page came up with this: "To avoid confusion, the NFL contemplated changing the Cardinals' name, but then dropped the idea." So It's safe to assume that the second part isn't true either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burkell007 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 how about Los Angeles Express from the USFL?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJTALBOT Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 For an expansion team, Legion or Legions.I think its going to be the LA RAIDERS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESTONES6 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 None of these names work. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosioux76 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I've always been partial to the name Los Angeles Condors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 The 49ers are getting a new stadium in the Bay Area...they're likely not going anywhere.Thanks for the update, didn't realize things were moving along there. Could the Raiders share it too, and not consider LA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.