Jungle Jim 888 Posted January 21 17 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said: Needs white pants. Oh, I agree. I was referring more to the overall design, but I didn't make that clear. That being said, I wouldn't be repulsed by these in mono black. Monochrome is less offensive with a new design than it is when tried with a classic look like the Bills or Chiefs. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
darthjocan 8 Posted January 21 Team makes if official. New uniforms coming spring 2021 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 1,011 Posted January 21 On 1/14/2021 at 7:45 PM, DNAsports said: ‘Tis but a pebble in the pond Old Joey really did it... 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Justpassingby 68 Posted January 21 So Bengals and heavy rumors surrounding the Cards. Anyone else? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,907 Posted January 21 31 minutes ago, Justpassingby said: So Bengals and heavy rumors surrounding the Cards. Anyone else? What "heavy rumors" surrounding the Cards? 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Justpassingby 68 Posted January 21 18 minutes ago, BBTV said: What "heavy rumors" surrounding the Cards? Kyler and Kliff being very open about their distaste for the uniforms have fueled lots of Cards fans to speculate the only reason they’d be that opinionated publicly about them is if a change was in the works. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,879 Posted January 22 3 hours ago, Justpassingby said: Kyler and Kliff being very open about their distaste for the uniforms have fueled lots of Cards fans to speculate the only reason they’d be that opinionated publicly about them is if a change was in the works. But that doesn’t mean they are changing this year either. They would have had to put in for the change right after drafting kyler 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjd77 1,564 Posted January 22 7 hours ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: Old Joey really did it... Obviously, he already knew. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DG_ThenNowForever 16,712 Posted January 22 42 minutes ago, dont care said: But that doesn’t mean they are changing this year either. They would have had to put in for the change right after drafting kyler Last season there were a million new uniforms -- Cleveland, Atlanta, LAC, LAR, Indianapolis, Tampa Bay, New England, etc. We didn't know about all of those time last year. Arizona has been using the same Reebok template since 2002. I don't know if there any other Reebok designs left. I highly, highly doubt Cincinnati will be the only refresh this season. Not given last season's activity, and not given Nike's general inability to keep things the same year over year. Oh all the teams in the league, Arizona is begging for change the most. I bet this is their year. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flyersfan 737 Posted January 22 16 hours ago, DG_ThenNowForever said: Last season there were a million new uniforms -- Cleveland, Atlanta, LAC, LAR, Indianapolis, Tampa Bay, New England, etc. We didn't know about all of those time last year. Arizona has been using the same Reebok template since 2002. I don't know if there any other Reebok designs left. I highly, highly doubt Cincinnati will be the only refresh this season. Not given last season's activity, and not given Nike's general inability to keep things the same year over year. Oh all the teams in the league, Arizona is begging for change the most. I bet this is their year. The only reebok-era designed teams left I believe are Arizona, Denver, Baltimore, Houston, Carolina. (Cincy obviously changing). I went through and looked at the last time teams got a new design at their uniform, which obviously applies to the 5 year rule. Teams that have kept their look since 2012, when Nike took over, meaning are eligible for any kind of rebrand: Cardinals, Ravens, Bills, Panthers, Bears, Cowboys, Broncos, Packers, Texans, Chiefs, Raiders, Saints, Giants, Eagles, Steelers, 49ers, Seahawks, Washington (sort-of). 2013, eligible: Vikings 2017, not eligible (4 years): Lions 2018, not eligible (3 years): Jaguars, Titans, Dolphins 2019, not eligible (2 years): Jets 2020, not eligible (1 year): Falcons, Browns, Colts, Chargers, Rams, Patriots, Buccaneers 2021: Bengals. (Washington in the future) Removing the "legendary looks" from the eligible teams, your pool of rebrand-able teams are: Cardinals, Ravens, Panthers, Broncos, Texans, Saints, Eagles, Seahawks, Vikings. If I were a betting man, I'd say we get Cardinals refresh (that will likely follow a more Rams path than a Buccaneers one) and Saints fixing things up, unifying the gold and picking their normal home/away color identity. Panthers rumors will probably run wild because us nerds hate how they translated to this template, but amount to nothing. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,879 Posted January 22 Broncos, ravens, and Carolina were all before Reebok took over 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DNAsports 6,152 Posted January 22 This is slightly noteworthy. The Falcons, along with Atlanta United, are retiring the No. 44 for the 2021 season in honor of Hank Aaron who passed away earlier today- 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,879 Posted January 22 So is it just for the season or will it be permanently retired, just the ceremony and start of the retirement will be next season? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 1,011 Posted January 23 1 hour ago, dont care said: So is it just for the season or will it be permanently retired, just the ceremony and start of the retirement will be next season? Just for the ‘21 season Also, wouldn’t this only affect fullbacks? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,907 Posted January 23 24 minutes ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: Just for the ‘21 season Also, wouldn’t this only affect fullbacks? Any running back, d-back, and LB can wear 44. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4_tattoos 1,499 Posted January 23 1 hour ago, BBTV said: Any running back, d-back, and LB can wear 44. tight ends as well 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kb105 125 Posted January 23 I know there are also a few EDGE guys (DE/LB) that wear numbers in the 40s, like Josh Allen on the Jags, but I don’t know if they are subject to defensive linemen or linebacker numbers. Vic Beasley played a similar position for the Falcons a few years back and wore 44. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MNtwins3 322 Posted January 23 14 hours ago, flyersfan said: The only reebok-era designed teams left I believe are Arizona, Denver, Baltimore, Houston, Carolina. (Cincy obviously changing). I went through and looked at the last time teams got a new design at their uniform, which obviously applies to the 5 year rule. Teams that have kept their look since 2012, when Nike took over, meaning are eligible for any kind of rebrand: Cardinals, Ravens, Bills, Panthers, Bears, Cowboys, Broncos, Packers, Texans, Chiefs, Raiders, Saints, Giants, Eagles, Steelers, 49ers, Seahawks, Washington (sort-of). 2013, eligible: Vikings 2017, not eligible (4 years): Lions 2018, not eligible (3 years): Jaguars, Titans, Dolphins 2019, not eligible (2 years): Jets 2020, not eligible (1 year): Falcons, Browns, Colts, Chargers, Rams, Patriots, Buccaneers 2021: Bengals. (Washington in the future) Removing the "legendary looks" from the eligible teams, your pool of rebrand-able teams are: Cardinals, Ravens, Panthers, Broncos, Texans, Saints, Eagles, Seahawks, Vikings. If I were a betting man, I'd say we get Cardinals refresh (that will likely follow a more Rams path than a Buccaneers one) and Saints fixing things up, unifying the gold and picking their normal home/away color identity. Panthers rumors will probably run wild because us nerds hate how they translated to this template, but amount to nothing. Technically the Texans added their logo above the nameplate 2(?) seasons ago, so they might be considered out of the running 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,879 Posted January 23 18 minutes ago, MNtwins3 said: Technically the Texans added their logo above the nameplate 2(?) seasons ago, so they might be considered out of the running You can make minor adjustments, just not for redesigns. Like the chargers changed their NOB colors within the 5 years before they redesigned. IRRC I believe Texans added the logo on the back the first Nike year anyways so they’re fine. Also the Texans have a perfect set and shouldn’t change them. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Froob 1,418 Posted January 23 2 hours ago, dont care said: You can make minor adjustments, just not for redesigns. Like the chargers changed their NOB colors within the 5 years before they redesigned. IRRC I believe Texans added the logo on the back the first Nike year anyways so they’re fine. Also the Texans have a perfect set and shouldn’t change them. Texans is alright. I think they should switch to color rush top full time and add red pants. That way, they’d actually match the logo. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
