BBTV Posted July 15, 2022 Share Posted July 15, 2022 For what it's worth, the Eagles regular white jersey was their designated "color rush" jersey, and was simply paired with the existing white pants. Their all-black alt was just an alt, while their primary white did double duty as color rush. Just pointing that out that if there's really a need to play within the rules, the Bengals could just say that their "color rush" is their regular white jersey. That being said, there really aren't going to be any rules, and the NCAAification of the NFL is upon us. Shouda limited it to throwback helmets only. 4 "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aawagner011 Posted July 15, 2022 Share Posted July 15, 2022 If the league is concerned about watering down primary identifies and wants to limit alternate helmet usage, why not just let the teams wear the extra helmet in 2 or 3 games max and let them wear it with whichever combinations they want? Seems like a win-win. This way there aren’t horrible mix and match uniforms like the Saints because they are restricted on how they can implement the helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canzman Posted July 15, 2022 Author Share Posted July 15, 2022 11 hours ago, BBTV said: For what it's worth, the Eagles regular white jersey was their designated "color rush" jersey, and was simply paired with the existing white pants. Their all-black alt was just an alt, while their primary white did double duty as color rush. Not true... From the team's official Slick from last season. They used all white for "color rush" when the match-up was deemed to not have enough contrast with the home team by the league. One thing many people forget is that the NFL is trying to become a global brand and expand outside the US market especially the UK which the NFL has been pushing to get a real hold in for years with the 2 to 3 UK games a year. The UK has different rules around TV broadcast that requires a license to get to view and offers both a more expense color license and a black and white license... yes there are still people who only have black and white TVs in this world of HD and 4K. Color license in the UK cost £159.00 where as the B&W only costs £53.50. The NFL still takes the contrast on B&W TV into consideration in the match-ups. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted July 15, 2022 Share Posted July 15, 2022 @canzmansince you have access to logo slicks, can you confirm the silver pants for the Pats? fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoGTS Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 7 hours ago, fouhy12 said: @canzmansince you have access to logo slicks, can you confirm the silver pants for the Pats? I can confirm that they are there. EDIT: I see this was posted in the other thread as well, I'm still catching up 1 Facebook: CustomSportsCovers Twitter: CSCovers Quote No because when the Irish came to Ireland and first came in contact with the leprechaun people, they didn't take their land away and force them to move west. Instead, the two groups learned to assimilate peacefully. However, certain tribes of the leprechaun refused to taint the pure blood and moved north into the forests of Ireland, only to be seen rarely, usually at the same time of a rainbows appearance and occasionally at the factories of Lucky Charms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bathysphere Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Genuinely curious as to what the Jags slick looks like and if it provides any insight to the madness which guides their uni selections. Would they even have a primary listed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoGTS Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Bathysphere said: Genuinely curious as to what the Jags slick looks like and if it provides any insight to the madness which guides their uni selections. Would they even have a primary listed? Teams like the Jaguars usually just have them listed all together with a note saying that the pants/socks are interchangeable, so no designations really. Facebook: CustomSportsCovers Twitter: CSCovers Quote No because when the Irish came to Ireland and first came in contact with the leprechaun people, they didn't take their land away and force them to move west. Instead, the two groups learned to assimilate peacefully. However, certain tribes of the leprechaun refused to taint the pure blood and moved north into the forests of Ireland, only to be seen rarely, usually at the same time of a rainbows appearance and occasionally at the factories of Lucky Charms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bathysphere Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 1 hour ago, TornadoGTS said: Teams like the Jaguars usually just have them listed all together with a note saying that the pants/socks are interchangeable, so no designations really. Ah alright. Sheesh, it’s real frustrating when a teams brand can get so loose and messy that you couldnt even say with authority what they would wear in the super bowl if they happened to make it. (almost like they know they never will and just dont care) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SportsFan12 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 42 minutes ago, Bathysphere said: Ah alright. Sheesh, it’s real frustrating when a teams brand can get so loose and messy that you couldnt even say with authority what they would wear in the super bowl if they happened to make it. (almost like they know they never will and just dont care) Both teams from the Super Bowl this year mixed and matched a ton throughout the season, but I agree this is usually not the case for Super Bowl teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruhammydude Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 On 7/8/2022 at 12:46 PM, WSU151 said: If the Chargers are 60, the Rams should be 46 (or even 36 or 16). Not sure why the Rams are 20, tbh. I know no one cares anymore, but these are what these should be: Bills: 60 Dolphins: 68 Patriots: 71 Jets: 63 Ravens: 96 Bengals: 68 Browns: 99 Steelers: 40 Texans: 2 Colts: 84 Jaguars: 95 Titans: 99 Broncos: 60 Chiefs: 63 Raiders: 20 Chargers: 17 Cowboys: 60 Giants: 25 Eagles: 33 Commanders: 22 Bears: 22 Lions: 34 Packers: 19 Vikings: 61 Falcons: 66 Panthers: 95 Saints: 67 Buccaneers: 76 Cardinals: 94 Rams: 16 49ers: 46 Seahawks: 76 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 5 hours ago, Bruhammydude said: I know no one cares anymore, but these are what these should be: Bills: 60 Dolphins: 68 Patriots: 71 Jets: 63 Ravens: 96 Bengals: 68 Browns: 99 Steelers: 40 Texans: 2 Colts: 84 Jaguars: 95 Titans: 99 Broncos: 60 Chiefs: 63 Raiders: 20 Chargers: 17 Cowboys: 60 Giants: 25 Eagles: 33 Commanders: 22 Bears: 22 Lions: 34 Packers: 19 Vikings: 61 Falcons: 66 Panthers: 95 Saints: 67 Buccaneers: 76 Cardinals: 94 Rams: 16 49ers: 46 Seahawks: 76 Wait, I’m completely confused by what this continued discussion is about. So we’re arguing about the year that Cazman should be putting on the jerseys of his mock ups? Putting aside the obvious fact that no one should be giving this so much thought energy, this still seems all over the place. You want to start counting some teams from their initial start, but others from when they last moved? Some teams you want to start over from when they changed the name of their location (New England) but not from when they changed their team name (Commanders)? Okay, be honest. This is really just more whining about the NFL’s decision to suspend the Browns’ franchise for a few years and start the Ravens as “new”, isn’t it? 3 1 http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 2 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said: Okay, be honest. This is really just more whining about the NFL’s decision to suspend the Browns’ franchise for a few years and start the Ravens as “new”, isn’t it? I wonder why this comes up as often as it does. You got your team back, Cleveland, and odds are your team doesn't become the team that wins the SB in 2001 without moving to Baltimore. Why does it matter if the NFL pretends the '46-'96 and '99-now Browns are the same franchise? As long as the Ravens don't try to claim the Browns history (and I'm pretty sure they legally can't), there should be no valid reason to keep discussing this topic in every NFL thread each year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indigo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 And if we must do this trivial number thing: Bills: 60 Dolphins: 66 Patriots: 60 Jets: 60 Ravens: 96 Bengals: 68 Browns: 46 Steelers: 33 Texans: 02 Colts: 53 Jaguars: 95 Titans: 60 Broncos: 60 Chiefs: 60 Raiders: 60 Chargers: 60 Cowboys: 60 Eagles: 25 Giants: 33 Commies: 32 Bears: 20 Lions: 30 Packers: 21 Vikings: 61 Falcons: 66 Panthers: 95 Saints: 67 Buccaneers: 76 Cardinals: 20 Rams: 36 49ers: 46 Seahawks: 76 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 4 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said: So we’re arguing about the year that Cazman should be putting on the jerseys of his mock ups? It's mid-July. What else are we supposed to whine about in this thread? 4 hours ago, oldschoolvikings said: the NFL’s decision to suspend the Browns’ franchise for a few years and start the Ravens as “new” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 1 hour ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: And if we must do this trivial number thing: Ravens: 96 Bengals: 68 Browns: 46 Steelers: 33 Under your format, it would need to be: Ravens: 46 Bengals: 68 Browns: 99 Steelers: 33 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Just do it in correspondence of the number franchise they are within the NFL For instance, Arizona would be be 1 and Houston would be 32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 13 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said: Just do it in correspondence of the number franchise they are within the NFL For instance, Arizona would be be 1 and Houston would be 32 Fun thought. But how would you assign all the Original AFL teams that came into existence at the same time? Same goes for Bucs/Hawks and Panthers/Jags. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Arizona Cardinals #1 Chicago Bears #2 Green Bay Packers #3 New York Giants #4 Detroit Lions #5 Washington Commanders #6 Philadelphia Eagles #7 or #8 Pittsburgh Steelers #7 or #8 Los Angeles Rams #9 Baltimore Ravens #10 or #11 San Francisco 49ers #10 or #11 Indianapolis Colts #12 Buffalo Bills #13 thru 21 Dallas Cowboys #13 thru 21 Denver Broncos #13 thru 21 Kansas City Chiefs #13 thru 21 Los Angeles Chargers #13 thru 21 Oakland Raiders #13 thru 21 New England Patriots #13 thru 21 New York Jets #13 thru 21 Tennessee Titans #13 thru 21 Minnesota Vikings #22 Atlanta Falcons #23 or #24 Miami Dolphins #23 or #24 New Orleans Saints #25 Cincinnati Bengals #26 Seattle Seahawks #27 or #28 Tampa Bay Buccaneers #27 or #28 Carolina Panthers #29 or #30 Jacksonville Jaguars #29 or #30 Cleveland Browns #31 Houston Texans #32 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sky1324 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 19 minutes ago, Cujo said: Carolina Panthers #29 or #30 Jacksonville Jaguars #29 or #30 Not sure about the other expansions but the Panthers were accepted into the league first, so they would be 29 and JAX would be 30. the user formerly known as cdclt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 56 minutes ago, CDCLT said: Not sure about the other expansions but the Panthers were accepted into the league first, so they would be 29 and JAX would be 30. I seem to recall that. But ya, figuring out the AFL entry order could prove to be impossible.. Quote On August 14, 1959, the first league meeting was held in Chicago, and charter memberships were given to Dallas, New York, Houston, Denver, Los Angeles, and Minneapolis-Saint Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts