TrueYankee26 Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 It looks ok trueyankee26.wordpress.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 better than the last few years.upgrade Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueYankee26 Posted May 21, 2008 Author Share Posted May 21, 2008 Yeah, the last 4 years they went futuristic, and it was a disaster trueyankee26.wordpress.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Not sold on the color scheme, but I like using the nickname, and I'm hoping that they use the plates/leaves as a secondary logo. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
officeglenn Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 I'm not crazy about the green in the lettering highlights or in the MLB logo ... seems like it's forced in there a bit too much. I'd rather see yellow in there instead. But still, one of the better logos in recent memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erlovepuck Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Where's the globe? No seriously I think this is a definite upgrade. I like the leaves and fall colors and it should translate better onto a sleeve patch then the logos of the last few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnick05 Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Upgrade. Those will look great on the Sox jerseys come October. Red Sox that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueYankee26 Posted May 21, 2008 Author Share Posted May 21, 2008 Those will look great on the Sox jerseys come October. Red Sox that is.Nah trueyankee26.wordpress.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grmuckrakers Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Those will look great on the Sox jerseys come October. Red Sox that is.NahActually, I was going to mention -- Those colors don't really go with ANY team except maybe the Athletics. Can you imagine that on a Diamondbacks or Angels uniform? Too much green.It's beautiful as a stand alone logo, but bad when they make it a patch or a uniform, or cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Nice. I'm glad they're doing away with the WS from 2088 look. Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Easily better than the ones in recent memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshawaggie Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 I love it, love the colors. The only thing I would change is maybe the green highlights to the letters. I'm not too fond of that type og highlighting, ditch it all together. @josh_j12 CFA- Fargo Bobcats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 This is so many miles ahead of the the terrible logos they'd been using since 2004, but it's still not perfect. The green beveling on the lettering isn't working for me, nor is the addition of "Fall Classic" on that ribbon device, especially in the modern sans-serif typeface. It clashes the same way as the dueling serifs/sans-serifs on the ASG logo, and noting that it'sm in its entirety, the World Series Fall Classic 2008 seems a little redundant and out of place, since it's a nickname for a nickname for the baseball championship. It'd be like the NFL putting "THE BIG GAME" or something on its Super Bowl logo. Actually, with the precipitous decline in Super Bowl logo quality, they just might.Aside from those nitpicks, this is comparatively awesome. ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEWJ Posted May 21, 2008 Share Posted May 21, 2008 Niiiice.Very, very nice, except for the weird shade of puke green, thats the only thing that takes away from the design.Much, much better than the logos in recent years. The best since the 90s for sure. | BROWNS | BUCKEYES | CAVALIERS | INDIANS | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griffelh Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 THe World Series logos from 1980-1986 were perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFoA Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 It looks okVery nice, and not just because it's way better than the logos from earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightynine Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 Hate the colors. Make the green deeper and put the MLB logo in its regular red-n-blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakland ehs Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 love it. classy before futuristic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J23P Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 colors, blah...but i like the actual design. reminds me of the SAm Adams beer label. mmmmmm, beeeeerrrrr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njmeadowlanders Posted May 22, 2008 Share Posted May 22, 2008 I'm a fan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.