colortv 2,049 Posted February 5 It’s curious how furious the reaction was to the logo after all the market research the Rams must have done. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sec19Row53 4,055 Posted February 5 On 1/28/2021 at 8:11 AM, BBTV said: Not stymied, but if they replicate the wordmark or a logo, there's more of a legal case against them. Anyone can make a black jersey with yellow strips and white numbers and sell it as "Pittsburgh (independent) Football Jersey", but once they put the patch on, it's illegal. Same with collar wordmarks. The argument against that is that some teams, like the Eagles, have both sleeve logos and collar wordmark, so I'd assume that's just a style thing. Just getting through this. I can't possibly say anything about the Rams uniforms that hasn't already been said, so I won't. But.... Do you have anything to support this? Again, this looks like one of those things that's trotted out to support an opinion, but with no legal justification. Logically? Sure, if you've counterfeited more things on a jersey it might be easier to prove that it's counterfeited. But from my reasonable standpoint, it you made a jersey that looked like the Steelers without a chest patch, it's still a Steelers jersey. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 20,882 Posted February 5 17 minutes ago, Sec19Row53 said: Just getting through this. I can't possibly say anything about the Rams uniforms that hasn't already been said, so I won't. But.... Do you have anything to support this? Again, this looks like one of those things that's trotted out to support an opinion, but with no legal justification. Logically? Sure, if you've counterfeited more things on a jersey it might be easier to prove that it's counterfeited. But from my reasonable standpoint, it you made a jersey that looked like the Steelers without a chest patch, it's still a Steelers jersey. First, I’m not a lawyer, but it just makes sense to me (though sense and the law are not necessarily the same thing). Let’s use the Raiders as an example. You can certainly buy plain white jerseys with non-proprietary block number fonts that aren’t “Raiders” jerseys, but... yeah they are. I’m not sure if one can trademark something where every element is in the public domain. Now if they put the NFL logo on it? Different story. The Steelers jersey uses a common font and a standard striping pattern. Maybe they could trademark it so that if some other team (arena or something) set up shop in Pittsburgh and adopted those jerseys then maybe the Steelers could argue that they own black and yellow for pro football in Pittsburgh, but I’m not sure what law a counterfeiter would be breaking if they used things that are free and unlicensed to make a relatively-generic jersey for sale. Again - once they use an official logo, that changes the story. I have no proof to support my theory so it could be totally wrong, it just seems logical to me. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sec19Row53 4,055 Posted February 5 7 minutes ago, BBTV said: First, I’m not a lawyer, but it just makes sense to me (though sense and the law are not necessarily the same thing). Let’s use the Raiders as an example. You can certainly buy plain white jerseys with non-proprietary block number fonts that aren’t “Raiders” jerseys, but... yeah they are. I’m not sure if one can trademark something where every element is in the public domain. Now if they put the NFL logo on it? Different story. The Steelers jersey uses a common font and a standard striping pattern. Maybe they could trademark it so that if some other team (arena or something) set up shop in Pittsburgh and adopted those jerseys then maybe the Steelers could argue that they own black and yellow for pro football in Pittsburgh, but I’m not sure what law a counterfeiter would be breaking if they used things that are free and unlicensed to make a relatively-generic jersey for sale. Again - once they use an official logo, that changes the story. I have no proof to support my theory so it could be totally wrong, it just seems logical to me. Yup - I agree with all of that. Just curious if there was something *more* to it. Thanks! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 1,007 Posted February 5 2 hours ago, colortv said: It’s curious how furious the reaction was to the logo after all the market research the Rams must have done. Market research would have shown that people wanted this or this 13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gothamite 24,461 Posted February 5 Yeah, I'm not sure how much market reaction they actually did. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gothamite 24,461 Posted February 5 2 hours ago, BBTV said: First, I’m not a lawyer, but it just makes sense to me (though sense and the law are not necessarily the same thing). Let’s use the Raiders as an example. You can certainly buy plain white jerseys with non-proprietary block number fonts that aren’t “Raiders” jerseys, but... yeah they are. I’m not sure if one can trademark something where every element is in the public domain. Now if they put the NFL logo on it? Different story. The Steelers jersey uses a common font and a standard striping pattern. Maybe they could trademark it so that if some other team (arena or something) set up shop in Pittsburgh and adopted those jerseys then maybe the Steelers could argue that they own black and yellow for pro football in Pittsburgh, but I’m not sure what law a counterfeiter would be breaking if they used things that are free and unlicensed to make a relatively-generic jersey for sale. Again - once they use an official logo, that changes the story. I have no proof to support my theory so it could be totally wrong, it just seems logical to me. That makes sense, but given how easy it is to find counterfeit jerseys that feature team wordmarks and logos, including league logos, I'm not sure how much of a deterrent those actually are. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dont care 6,871 Posted February 5 1 hour ago, Gothamite said: That makes sense, but given how easy it is to find counterfeit jerseys that feature team wordmarks and logos, including league logos, I'm not sure how much of a deterrent those actually are. Those are made by Chinese companies where IP law doesn’t exist. You wouldn’t see American companies doing it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colortv 2,049 Posted February 6 3 hours ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: Market research would have shown that people wanted this or this A helmet as the logo would be the lamest thing IMO. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 1,007 Posted February 6 42 minutes ago, colortv said: A helmet as the logo would be the lamest thing IMO. There are folks in Cleveland, Ohio who would like to request a conversation with you, @colortv. Besides that, would you rather have a helmet with the Rams' signature horns on it, or an "LA" (from a team that spent 17 years in the midwest) with a gradient horn crammed into the "A"? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldschoolvikings 18,417 Posted February 6 The logos aren't good, but they're better than the uniforms. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_DietDrPepper_ 4,371 Posted February 6 34 minutes ago, colortv said: A helmet as the logo would be the lamest thing IMO. It’s better than whatever they tried to do. 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManillaToad 1,344 Posted February 6 4 hours ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: The ram head looks so good in these colors. Erase the slug part and it'd be one of the best angry animal face logos there is 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jp1409 2,007 Posted February 6 47 minutes ago, oldschoolvikings said: The logos aren't good, but they're better than the uniforms. As much as I loathe their uniforms, their logos are absolutely cringeworthy... 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colortv 2,049 Posted February 6 1 hour ago, LA Fakers+ LA Snippers said: There are folks in Cleveland, Ohio who would like to request a conversation with you, @colortv. Besides that, would you rather have a helmet with the Rams' signature horns on it, or an "LA" (from a team that spent 17 years in the midwest) with a gradient horn crammed into the "A"? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colortv 2,049 Posted February 6 Just a mock up but boy would these be wonderful. https://www.facebook.com/RamsNationFB/photos/2867312603520801 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LA Fakers+ LA Snippers 1,007 Posted February 6 Just now, colortv said: Just a mock up but boy would these be wonderful. https://www.facebook.com/RamsNationFB/photos/2867312603520801 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ridleylash 4,190 Posted February 6 :censored:, I hate that stupid name tag. What was wrong with just having the word "RAMS" above the number? That's what everybody else does. 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AgentColon2 2,562 Posted February 6 There is no salvaging the current set. 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManillaToad 1,344 Posted February 6 2 hours ago, colortv said: Just a mock up but boy would these be wonderful. The colors are perfect for a yellow jersey, it would be a good addition 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites