SoxSteeler Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Way too much navy if it's Seattle vs New England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roars87 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 This would look good too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsaline97 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 If only the gradient helmet actually looked like that..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fouhy12 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 This would look good tooAgreed, green and yellow vs navy and red is great color-wise. On a separate note, the Cowboys' loss yesterday all but guarantees that the AFC will be in white this year. fouhy12's NFL Concepts 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chawls Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Colts - Packers would certainly look the best. Quote If you hadn't noticed, Chawls loves his wrestling, whether it be real life or sim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 When really looking at the Falcons logo, besides the claws being too large, the head stick out way to far too (again trying to force the F out of it). A quick edit and it looks much better to my eye at least.i....Uhhh....no. That looks like crap. Now he looks like that t-rex from that animated movie. "I've got a big head, and little arms!" Not to mention the feathers now look more like a stegosaurus' back spikes. And why can't we make an F? That's our tradition. The Eagles get to make an E and nobody bitches about it. The old logo made a better "F" then the current one does.As a design, I'd just rather see something that better evokes the look/feel of an actual falcon instead of forcing it to be an F. Besides, on the opposite side of the helmet, the logo is just a distorted falcon and not an F at all since it's backwards. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh.0 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 I wouldn't mind this ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikWings Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Just wish Seattle would wear grey pants instead of that god awful mono look they love so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Have you attempted any others? The Seahawks or Jags may hold some goodies considering how much they changed through the design process. It looks like Nike originally had designed the Seahawks grey (and probably white) jersey with neon green on the shoulders, which would've matched the navy jerseys. I've always wondered why this design element isn't consistent on all 3 jerseys. I wonder if Nike or someone with the Seahawks changed it? I now also wonder if they originally designed the grey and white pants to have the same striping as the navy pants, but was then changed to match the changes to the grey and white jerseys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigers6884 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Just wish Seattle would wear grey pants instead of that god awful mono look they love so much.I would enjoy that as well, but preferably white instead of grey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Just wish Seattle would wear grey pants instead of that god awful mono look they love so much.I would enjoy that as well, but preferably white instead of grey.I originally was with you on that (back in early 2000s) but the mono has really become their look. It would be odd to see them in anything except mono at home. Kind of like seeing the Cowboys not wearing white jerseys at home. Would just look wrong. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Seattle's home jersey looks God awful with the grey and white pants. The white pants looked just as terrible with the previous set, too. I don't mind the grey pants with the white jersey, though. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illwauk Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 This isn't a 2014 "change", but I didn't think it deserved a thread of its own...As one who is basically rooting for uniforms at this point in the NFL playoffs, I'll be hoping for a Green Bay - Indianapolis Super Bowl.This...We almost got this for Super Bowl XXX. The Colts are one of the few teams (and possibly the only one) that I think have better uniforms than the Packers, and I want this as bad now as I did then.The Packers will definitely wear green if they make it. They haven't lost in green all season, and if they still wore green for Super Bowl XLV after winning three road playoff games, I don't see why they wouldn't do it this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VikWings Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 Seattle's home jersey looks God awful with the grey and white pants. The white pants looked just as terrible with the previous set, too.I don't mind the grey pants with the white jersey, though.I disagree. With the old set blue on white looked great and white looked good with either color pants. Mono-blue looked awful then and does now. (Side note I actually liked the one-of Lime green jerseys. The sunlight that day didn't do them justice.)With the current set they don't even need white pants, because there's minimal white in the uniforms. Their best look is b/w/b. b/w/g looks good as well as does b/b/g. Mono blue looks awful, but I'm also not a fan of most mono chrome looks, other than maybe once a year to change it up. I hate it as a consistent look.TheseAre all soooooooo much better than this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinTheDay8 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Why haven't we seen the pro bowl uniforms yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Why haven't we seen the pro bowl uniforms yet? Last year we saw them before the regular season ended I do believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliasrappaport Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 I think they're the same except switched (one team wears color the other does not). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuordr Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 The Seahawks have been wearing monochrome at home since 2002 and I am surprised that people still talk about it. 12 years is a tradition at this point and I really don't see them wearing anything different at home outside of a preseason game. So even though the gray pants may look better in someones opinion, I would not expect any changes to occur for several years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOldRoman Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 The Seahawks have been wearing monochrome at home since 2002 and I am surprised that people still talk about it. 12 years is a tradition at this point and I really don't see them wearing anything different at home outside of a preseason game. So even though the gray pants may look better in someones opinion, I would not expect any changes to occur for several years. That's true, but it still looks like horse crap. So just like the Cowboys with their mismatched blues and silvers, we'll keep talking about how bad it is that they stick with a tradition which is ugly and easily fixable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Yeah, except that the Seahawks mono blue is an awesome look while the Cowboys mismatched blues and silvers isn't. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.