The_Admiral Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 In my ideal alternate universe, the Hornets would be in Oklahoma City with a black/yellow/brick palette and all franchise records, and the Charlotte Bobcats would pick up the teal, purple, and Rockwell Bold Condensed, honor the 1988-2002 Hornets as they see fit but keep the Bobcats name. Oklahoma City would unretire Maravich's #7 and Bobby Phills's #13, Charlotte would re-retire the latter. Some may see this Bobcats logo as a perverse facsimile of the joy the Hornets brought to the Carolinas. I think it's pretty good as far as NBA recolors go; better than the actual recolor the Bobcats did in their "last" years, as much as I did see promise in the color scheme. And besides, all this would mean that the Supersonics exist, the Pelicans don't, and the Thunder don't either. Even with flaws, it's a...net gain. yeeaahhhh Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 Speaking of relocations,\The classic Expos logo is incredibly ugly. While I do appreciate the attempt to subtly add the "e" and "b" to the "M" silhouette (even if it adds an unintentional "l" into the mix), the execution is lacking. Instead of looking graceful, it simply looks like an M-shaped blob with an "e" and "b" attached. If the unlikely return of the Expos was ever to happen, I hope they aren't forced to use this logo. I'd much rather they use something like this:A combination of the excellent (and more importantly, graceful) "M" from the 1992-2004 road script with a contrast-colored fleur-de-lis (as a way of contrasting them with the Anglophone Blue Jays and their Maple Leaf logo). Quote MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenD Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 I don't think it's unpopular but I loved that they accented the e with a fleur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uuh70 Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 I loved this set for Georgia Tech and think they should return ASAP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverBullet1929 Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Speaking of relocations,\The classic Expos logo is incredibly ugly. While I do appreciate the attempt to subtly add the "e" and "b" to the "M" silhouette (even if it adds an unintentional "l" into the mix), the execution is lacking. Instead of looking graceful, it simply looks like an M-shaped blob with an "e" and "b" attached. If the unlikely return of the Expos was ever to happen, I hope they aren't forced to use this logo. I'd much rather they use something like this:A combination of the excellent (and more importantly, graceful) "M" from the 1992-2004 road script with a contrast-colored fleur-de-lis (as a way of contrasting them with the Anglophone Blue Jays and their Maple Leaf logo).I like where your going with this idea but that M logo reads "cM" to me. The "c" in the curl is very pronounced and once you see it, it cant be unseen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 That fleur just doesn't work with the M to me. It looks like the M is either kicking it, or vacuuming it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverBullet1929 Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 That fleur just doesn't work with the M to me. It looks like the M is either kicking it, or vacuuming it up.True. If anything the fleur should slightly overlap the M like the Jays bird is overlapped by the maple leaf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-Squared Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I loved this set for Georgia Tech and think they should return ASAPNot just piping... not just side-paneling... piped side-paneling. Woof. Quote My TeePublic Shop My Instagram Art Page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh.0 Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I really love the Browns' new brown jerseys.JK! I think that'd make me a horrible person if I really did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chcarlson23 Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I really love the Browns' new brown jerseys.JK! I think that'd make me a horrible person if I really did.I feel like those uniforms wouldn't be half bad if they didn't have the word Browns on the side of the pants. Or if they weren't paired with orange socks. Quote "And those who know Your Name put their trust in You, for You, O Lord, have not forsaken those who seek You." Psalms 9:10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1insaneguy Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I don't know how unpopular this is, but there are a number of CFL identities that I really like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOldRoman Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I feel like those uniforms wouldn't be half bad if they didn't have the word Browns on the side of the pants. Or if they weren't paired with orange socks. I think that'd make me a horrible person if I really did.Maybe, but they'd still be about 80% bad. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Navy > Royal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConcreteCharlie Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Redskins wearing yellow pants > Redskins wearing red pants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy B Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 I think this is the best the Rockets have ever looked and don't want them to rebrand anytime soon. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jp1409 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 I don't know how unpopular this is, but there are a number of CFL identities that I really like.You don't know how unpopular this is? Seriously? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Redskins wearing yellow pants > Redskins wearing red pantsYellow pants at home, burgundy pants on the road. Ideal outcome. 1 Quote ♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOldRoman Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Maybe I have an unpopular opinion because a bunch of people seem to love the Redskins' yellow pants. I have grown really tired of them.They look stale and just completely symbolic of a failed era in Washington. I particularly dislike the home jerseys with them. And it's not just the pants, it's the socks that match nothing, the shrunken sleeve stripes and the toothpick sleeve numbers Nike reduced them to. The whole Redskins uniform just looks awful and cheap now, at least to me.So much better than:(and I realize they dropped the toilet collars on the roads. I couldn't find a better picture). 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnWis97 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Maybe I have an unpopular opinion because a bunch of people seem to love the Redskins' yellow pants. I have grown really tired of them.They look stale and just completely symbolic of a failed era in Washington. I particularly dislike the home jerseys with them. And it's not just the pants, it's the socks that match nothing, the shrunken sleeve stripes and the toothpick sleeve numbers Nike reduced them to. The whole Redskins uniform just looks awful and cheap now, at least to me.I totally agree. When I heard they were going to yellow pants I thought it sounded great. And it just looks blah. Quote Disclaimer: If this comment is about an NBA uniform from 2017-2018 or later, do not constitute a lack of acknowledgement of the corporate logo to mean anything other than "the corporate logo is terrible and makes the uniform significantly worse." BADGERS TWINS VIKINGS TIMBERWOLVES WILD POTD (Shared) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1insaneguy Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 I don't know how unpopular this is, but there are a number of CFL identities that I really like.You don't know how unpopular this is? Seriously?Seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.