PatsFan12 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 HINT: That's not Michigan in the picture.Who is it then? On the bright side, everybody has brought life into this otherwise-moribund sub-forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSHARE18 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 HINT: That's not Michigan in the picture.Who is it then?Delaware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayMac Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 HINT: That's not Michigan in the picture.Who is it then?DelawareBut when paired with the uniform, Delaware looks much different than Michigan. Delaware uses a royal blue for its uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discrim Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Haven't read pages 5 or 6 yet, here's to hoping nobody beat me to this...Australian football...the bloke with the yellow sash plays for Richmond, the fella in the red sash is an Essendon man. Essendon-Richmond matches have basically looked like this since at least the mid 1920s (home side will wear black shorts, away side will wear white shorts).Now that I think about it, something I've thought about for a while, actually: three NFL jerseys that, at first glance, don't bear much resemblance to one another: the Ravens, Eagles and Bucs road whites. Strip em down, however, and you pretty much have the same basic white jersey with black collars and cuffs. As a saying of dubious age goes, the basics can wherever you want em to.edit: I was about to put the Saints too, as their whites have black collars too. Can't though, cus they don't use black cuffs. A strong mind gets high off success, a weak mind gets high off bull Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancealot Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Haven't read pages 5 or 6 yet, here's to hoping nobody beat me to this...Australian football...the bloke with the yellow sash plays for Richmond, the fella in the red sash is an Essendon man. Essendon-Richmond matches have basically looked like this since at least the mid 1920s (home side will wear black shorts, away side will wear white shorts).Yes this has been one of my major gear grinders for a long time, (as well as north and collingwood) although Richmond has a curved sash rather than a strait one, as well as adding the side panel to the road uniform recently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksupilot Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Everyone knows the Reds and the Bears use the wishbone C...many forget back in the day the Indians used it as well. Indians:Reds: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Star Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Why don't we compare colors. The Rams Athletic Gold and Royal Blue was far superior to be frank. The blue and white look too much like the 1953-1955 Baltimore Colts. Next to kin, we have BYU that looks totally the same.Around the 90's BYU added the black to their uniforms. But the two stripes on the blue uniforms look too much like the 1966-1980 Dallas Cowboys blue uniforms.Take the Y off and the block shadows. And finally change the serif and what do you have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prof Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC in Da House w/o a Doubt Posted January 11, 2013 Author Share Posted January 11, 2013 I always thought these were too close, especially considering they play in the same building.Similar fonts, both use those motion lines, basically the same idea... you could probably switch the colors and swap the team names in the logos and more than a few people wouldn't notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 This was an ugly set for Nike because all the Nike teams wore that same uniform with different colors. The circle numbers were the worst part. Granted the 1998 Nike World Cup uniforms were pretty close to each other as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugevolsfan Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I always thought these were too close, especially considering they play in the same building.Similar fonts, both use those motion lines, basically the same idea... you could probably switch the colors and swap the team names in the logos and more than a few people wouldn't notice.I have been thinking the same thing for a few days now I just feel the Clippers logo actually looks better My Fictional Football League Version 3 My Fictional Football Leagues WebsiteMy Church Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prof Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 This was an ugly set for Nike because all the Nike teams wore that same uniform with different colors. The circle numbers were the worst part. Granted the 1998 Nike World Cup uniforms were pretty close to each other as well.I know, but I think that the worst part was the retro... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadmanLA Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I'm kinda surprised that this hasn't been brought up yet, especially with it happening more recently...Obviously, not with the colors, but with similar (but not exact) fonts and name/numeral placements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Island_Style Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Some of these are dead on but all in all this thread is reach nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmic Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Yep, I can see how midnight blue, silver, and athletic gold could get confused with royal blue and orange Would have been a much better comparison with the old Sabres uniforms: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youcan'tseeme Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 I own all 4 of these. The worst I'd say is Winnipeg and Columbus as looking the same goes.As well as these 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBGKon Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Diamondbacks and Astros, although we don't have to worry about it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Island_Style Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 The Panther blue doesn't look all that bad but I hate it that they went that route. What's with the light blue? Lets replace it with red or yellow. Lets see how that works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kw11333 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Red Bulls New YorkFC Redbulls SalzburgEC Red Bull SalzburgThis is why giant companies should not be allowed to purchase club team names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 Red Bulls New YorkFC Redbulls SalzburgEC Red Bull SalzburgThis is why giant companies should not be allowed to purchase club team names.This is more like varsity/ JV/freshman uniforms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.