andrewharrington Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 ...so if a vendor like nike or reebok can put a convincing business case together that an annual one-off uniform would provide incremental merchandise revenue with little or no risk to brand dilution...This is pretty much a complete paradox of impossibility, which is why I don't think you'll ever see one-offs in the NFL. Some teams might end up wearing crazy Nike designs like Denver did, but don't expect one-offs.why not?..I bet you thought the nfl would never allow same color pants/socks, pants w/o stripes, alternate jerseys or monochrome combos...Teams have been wearing same color pants/socks, pants w/o stripes, alternate jerseys and monochrome combos since the 1920s. The difference is, league revenue wasn't driven by merchandising or television then, so dilution of brand was apples compared to the oranges it is today.In response to an earlier post, digging in the past for one-offs is completely different than inventing a brand new one-off. It's a history lesson, if you will, and learning something new about where we came from is never a bad thing. I still don't have a website, but I have a dribbble now! http://dribbble.com/andyharry [The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the position, strategy or opinions of adidas and/or its brands.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wILL-INI Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Just posted to Nike footballs facebook. "Classic" does not mean it gets a free pass for being bad design.Portfolio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knnhrvy16 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Saw this on Nike Football's facebook page...The chin is bugging me, but the rest of it is a great update. The opinions I express are mine, and mine only. If I am to express them, it is not to say you or anyone else is wrong, and certainly not to say that I am right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeFrank Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Panthers logo is clearly tweaked. Looks good, nothing special.EDIT: The large image actually looks really good. More fluid. Nice! concepts: washington football (2017) ... nfl (2013) ... yikes potd 10/20/12 origin story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxweb81 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Look at the post above, it has a new carolina panthers logo! It's hard to tell it but zoom in close and then compare it to the current logo. There is more blue on the face and the eyes and teeth are more simplified. Interesting... Beat me to it lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Wow, way to let that one slip, Nike. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezus_Ghoti Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Wow, that is huge news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckymack Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Oh snap! Logo leak! Sigs are for sissies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Old vs new:It's a subtle but nice update. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 His teeth remind me of Brak.... Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmd9 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Just posted to Nike footballs facebook.Some look cool, but others just aren't going to look right. I wish Nike would have used alternate logos on some. For example teams like the Redskins, Steelers, Browns, Vikings, and even the Jets will look bad unless the players have their hands perfectly positioned like the promo pic. Those logos are just too detailed I think. Why not use the dog logo for Cleveland, R logo for Washington, horn or V for Minnesota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyAnna Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Just posted to Nike footballs facebook.I never realized the Eagles are the only team to have their logo facing the other direction. The Pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkansasdolfan Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Not to take the attention away from the massive Panthers leak, but the aqua in the Dolphins logo is significantly lighter than the normal shade. It is more in line with the 70's-89 color. Maybe it is nothing, but you never know! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyAnna Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Wow, way to let that one slip, Nike.I'm shocked they did that prior to this season officially ending. Hopefully the Seahawks still get a slight logo tweak in April. The Pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JQK Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Just posted to Nike footballs facebook.I never realized the Eagles are the only team to have their logo facing the other direction.The back of the eagle's head makes an "E", so that would seem to be the reason for that anomaly... Stay Tuned Sports Podcast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henburg Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Not to take the attention away from the massive Panthers leak, but the aqua in the Dolphins logo is significantly lighter than the normal shade. It is more in line with the 70's-89 color. Maybe it is nothing, but you never know!I actually thought the same thing when I first saw it too and I hope that it's true. The Dolphin's gloves were one of my favorites because of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CS85 Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Those colts gloves look painfully dull. Quote "You are nothing more than a small cancer on this message board. You are not entertaining, you are a complete joke." twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDixonDesign Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Not to take the attention away from the massive Panthers leak, but the aqua in the Dolphins logo is significantly lighter than the normal shade. It is more in line with the 70's-89 color. Maybe it is nothing, but you never know!I actually thought the same thing when I first saw it too and I hope that it's true. The Dolphin's gloves were one of my favorites because of it.Everything I've seen has been the same. The Seahawks have a color tweak from the Fog color back to Grey. I'm pleased to see that throughout most of the process, there has been a lot more emphasis on the lime green for the Seahawks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 Why not use the dog logo for ClevelandThe dog logo represents the fans of the team (Dawg Pound), not the team itself. Just like the old Hoggettes in Washington. Back-to-Back Fatal Forty Champion 2015 & 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyAnna Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 The Seahawks have a color tweak from the Fog color back to Grey.Looks like the denim blue has been replaced with silver. Oh please, oh pretty please. *fingers crossed* The Pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.