mmajeski06 Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Tough to tell...but I thought the turf looked like crap during the Jets game (could be all things look like crap when the Jets are on them). Saw big splotches of black rubber. http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap2000000231449/Pre-Week-2-Jaguars-vs-Jets-highlightsThere's the highlights from the game, not sure if the splotches are as prevalent on a computer screen as they were on an HD tv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangefaniniowa Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 What does Marshal Faulk breakin some Panther ankles have to do with anything?It's the only time the Panthers have worn their white jerseys with silver pants. And I much prefer it to the white pants/white jersey look.I wish the Panthers ownership would come to their senses and scrap the white pants. It does not make sense at all. You are wearing a silver helmet and the silver pants should match with it no matter what jersey color they are wearing. The Panthers will look a billion times better wearing white/silver, black/silver, alt blue/silver etc. I do really like their all black look as well. There is no rhyme or reason why the Panthers should have white pants in the first place, but I guess it is not up to me to decide. Still, I think the all white look is wrong and just lame to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buster Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Here is an interesting fact. There is no black panther. It is either a black jaguar or a black leopard. Nonsense. Si Robertson has seen a black panther on several occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fufkin Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Tough to tell...but I thought the turf looked like crap during the Jets game (could be all things look like crap when the Jets are on them). Saw big splotches of black rubber. http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap2000000231449/Pre-Week-2-Jaguars-vs-Jets-highlightsThere's the highlights from the game, not sure if the splotches are as prevalent on a computer screen as they were on an HD tv It's an all new field that was put in at the beginning of July. It probably looked bad because there was a grass field laid on top earlier in the week for the Mexico-Ivory Coast soccer match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Did anyone else notice how much wider the striping is on the Packers pants this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goforbroke Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Tough to tell...but I thought the turf looked like crap during the Jets game (could be all things look like crap when the Jets are on them). Saw big splotches of black rubber. http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap2000000231449/Pre-Week-2-Jaguars-vs-Jets-highlightsThere's the highlights from the game, not sure if the splotches are as prevalent on a computer screen as they were on an HD tv It's an all new field that was put in at the beginning of July. It probably looked bad because there was a grass field laid on top earlier in the week for the Mexico-Ivory Coast soccer match.EDIT - I rethought about posting this. Decided not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSky Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Did anyone else notice how much wider the striping is on the Packers pants this year? Wow...those are damn near 1980s Niner-worthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Did anyone else notice how much wider the striping is on the Packers pants this year? Wow...those are damn near 1980s Niner-worthy.I know! I can't believe there haven't been a bunch of people on here complaining about Nike "forcing" the Packers to make changes to their uniform. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderbread Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Did anyone else notice how much wider the striping is on the Packers pants this year? Wow...those are damn near 1980s Niner-worthy. I know! I can't believe there haven't been a bunch of people on here complaining about Nike "forcing" the Packers to make changes to their uniform. LOL. Considering they are still wearing the same style pants as what they had before nike came, it cant be all nikes fault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 It might be Nike's fault. Here's what they were wearing before Nikeand this is from last yearbut then the 49ers who had virtually identical stripe width measurements on the helmets and pants with Reebok went with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 It might be Nike's fault. Here's what they were wearing before Nikeand this is from last yearbut then the 49ers who had virtually identical stripe width measurements on the helmets and pants with Reebok went with thisAre the Packers using the old style pants still or are they just using the old jersey style? If it is the old style pants, it can't just be the same issue as the 49ers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sport Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 I forgot about that part. I think they are still using the old kind of pants, now that you mention it.Here's a picture from last season:http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/images/photos/002/120/245/hi-res-158216660_crop_exact.jpg?w=1500&h=1500&q=85The large stripe may be because Nike had to use a different manufacturer for Green Bay's old style of pants than the one reebok used. That could be what's caused the change in stripe size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illini1 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 I didn't remember the pants looking like that last year. It looks like it might be a little wider this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruColor Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 On-Field specs say all three pant stripes should be 1". Alert Roger Goodall STAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phutmasterflex Posted August 24, 2013 Share Posted August 24, 2013 It might be Nike's fault. Here's what they were wearing before Nikeand this is from last yearbut then the 49ers who had virtually identical stripe width measurements on the helmets and pants with Reebok went with thisThat Cobb picture was from last year, and it's the bicycle shorts so the stripes stretch.With that in mind, I think that's what is going on this year. The Pack much have adopted the Nike version of the pants, which means the stripes are part of this mesh fabric. And since EVERY player is not required to use thigh and knee pads, could it be that's why they're stretching and making the stripes look so wide? Go A's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracy MidGrady Posted August 24, 2013 Share Posted August 24, 2013 It might be Nike's fault. Here's what they were wearing before Nikeand this is from last yearbut then the 49ers who had virtually identical stripe width measurements on the helmets and pants with Reebok went with thisThat Cobb picture was from last year, and it's the bicycle shorts so the stripes stretch.With that in mind, I think that's what is going on this year. The Pack much have adopted the Nike version of the pants, which means the stripes are part of this mesh fabric. And since EVERY player is not required to use thigh and knee pads, could it be that's why they're stretching and making the stripes look so wide?Actually every player is required to wear thigh and knee pads starting this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted August 24, 2013 Share Posted August 24, 2013 Seahawks in grey pants. I prefer blue tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 24, 2013 Share Posted August 24, 2013 Seahawks in grey pants.I prefer blue tbh.Agreed, I would like to see the gray used at home but highly doubt thats going to happen much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted August 24, 2013 Share Posted August 24, 2013 Seahawks in grey pants.The Seahawks vaguely resembled an NFL team last night. These are the only pants they need. The navy pants look OK with the white jersey, but destroy the home look completely.As I've said before, giving the Seahawks a dark pants option is like giving a 4 year old scissors. They've proved over and over they can't be trusted with dark pants... it's best just to take them away. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sluggermatt15 Posted August 24, 2013 Share Posted August 24, 2013 The gray pants look okay with the white jerseys, IMO. Reminds me of the Cowboys's look. Is it me or do the navy blue helmets look very dark? Looks like they are a shade or two darker than the detailing on the jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.